11.10.2013 Views

Risk Management Manual of Examination Policies - FDIC

Risk Management Manual of Examination Policies - FDIC

Risk Management Manual of Examination Policies - FDIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GENERAL CHARACTER OF THE MANAGEMENT (Continued)<br />

Discuss proposed board and management committees and their associated responsibilities. Assess the reasonableness <strong>of</strong> fees and<br />

other expenses associated with the application and organization, including insider involvement. Evaluate the reasonableness <strong>of</strong> stock<br />

benefit plans, including stock options, stock warrants, and other similar stock based compensation plans. The structure <strong>of</strong> stock<br />

benefit plans should encourage the continued involvement <strong>of</strong> the participants and serve as an incentive for the successful operation <strong>of</strong><br />

the institution. Assess reasonableness <strong>of</strong> fidelity coverage. An insured depository institution should maintain sufficient coverage on<br />

its active <strong>of</strong>ficers and employees to conform with generally accepted industry practices.<br />

Summary and Findings<br />

Board Committee Structure and Fidelity Coverage<br />

The organizers have provided for a usual and customary committee structure to assist in overseeing and managing the bank’s<br />

operations. No exceptions were noted to these proposals and structures. Organizers stated that sufficient fidelity coverage would be<br />

procured and maintained.<br />

Reasonableness <strong>of</strong> Organizational Expenses<br />

Organizational and pre-opening expenses appear excessive for the formation <strong>of</strong> a denovo national association and do not reflect<br />

favorably on the Applicant.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the responsibility for these high expenses can arguably be attributed to the previous leadership during the prior Application<br />

submission (August 2000). Casey Grant, the lead organizer and proposed Chairman/CEO displayed a lack <strong>of</strong> fiscal discipline during<br />

his tenure and was responsible for formulating the previous nontraditional and seemingly higher risk business model. This model was<br />

poorly supported and thus required extensive time to procure supporting documentaion and fesibilitiy studies. During this lengthy<br />

process, Mr. Grant relied extensively on legal cousel and consultants which added to the expense burden. Finally, Mr. Grant<br />

prematurely added a staff <strong>of</strong> twenty, including highly compensated <strong>of</strong>ficers, which impacted pre-chartering costs.<br />

Since the previous management’s departure and filing <strong>of</strong> the new Application, organizational expenses while high, appear to have<br />

moderated. Despite the high organizational expenses, management has been successsful, during two separaterly underwritten capital<br />

<strong>of</strong>ferings, in forming a substantial amount <strong>of</strong> capital. It is believed this capital is sufficient to absorb the high costs and provide for the<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> the proposal.<br />

Employment Agreements & Compensation<br />

The Applicant anticipates negotiating employment agreements with several <strong>of</strong>ficers. The <strong>of</strong>ficers (to date) with corresponding annual<br />

salaries are as follows: Chairman/CEO Joe Hamm, $150M; CFO Nigel Newbury ∗ $55M; CTO Frank Gray, $55M; CLO John Well,<br />

$90M. In addition, Controller Sue Herrera $65M; and Senior Technology Officer Brian Bain $110M will reportedly be under<br />

contract. The agreements generally include the following standard terms:<br />

• Employment Term: Generally one year. Continues thereafter unless terminated by either party;<br />

• Other Benefits: Medical, and participation in any existing stock benefit plan.<br />

• Bonus: Sole discretion <strong>of</strong> Board <strong>of</strong> Directors<br />

• Termination without Cause: Lump sum payment equal to the present value <strong>of</strong> the unexpired portion <strong>of</strong> the employee’s term<br />

(effectively less than or equal to 1 year). Discount derived using the prevailing Federal funds rate.<br />

Stock Benefit Plan<br />

The Applicant intends to formulate a plan for certain executive <strong>of</strong>ficers, directors, and other employees. To date, this plan has not<br />

been formalized or submitted for Regulatory review. Organizers have committed to enacting a plan that is consistent with existing<br />

regulatory guidelines. Said plan should be scrutinized for reasonableness in light <strong>of</strong> exceptions taken by the Examiner during the prior<br />

Messrs. Newbury and Gray’ respective salaries represent the proposed bank’s pro-rata expense only. Additional compensation <strong>of</strong><br />

$55M for each will be paid by Holding Company-1, London, England. This represents compensation for services performed at the<br />

top-tier holding company level. Refer to biographical information for their respective roles.<br />

<strong>FDIC</strong> 6510/10 (02-2002) 31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!