11.10.2013 Views

Risk Management Manual of Examination Policies - FDIC

Risk Management Manual of Examination Policies - FDIC

Risk Management Manual of Examination Policies - FDIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Description <strong>of</strong> the Transaction<br />

INVESTIGATION REPORT CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

Applicant is a Federally chartered National Association in organization and as such, has no financial history. Proponent originally<br />

applied to the Office <strong>of</strong> the Comptroller <strong>of</strong> the Currency (OCC), its primary regulator, for permission to organize as a National<br />

Association on August 23, 2000.<br />

However, due to the volume <strong>of</strong> substantive deficiencies in the Application, the OCC and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,<br />

requested additional supporting information during the Fall <strong>of</strong> 2000. In summation, these deficiencies emanated from the lack <strong>of</strong><br />

supporting documentation regarding critical business model assumptions including but not limited to, customer acquisition rates as<br />

well as, deposit/loan growth composition and volumes. Other material weaknesses included the absence <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itability within the<br />

formative stages and independent market research supporting the feasibility <strong>of</strong> the nontraditional delivery channels proposed {nonbranch<br />

kiosk}. Weaknesses emanating from the original proposal were never satisfactorily resolved and the Applicant withdrew the<br />

proposal on April 16, 2001.<br />

Applicant, after substantive modifications to the business model and management team, resubmitted the proposal on October 9, 2001.<br />

The proposal calls for the Applicant to be part <strong>of</strong> a two-tier holding company structure. The United States (US) based holding<br />

company and initial-tier will be Holding Company-2, Incorporated, Anytown, Anystate. It will be a wholly owned subsidiary <strong>of</strong><br />

Holding Company-1 plc, London, England, the top-tier holding company. Both holding companies are active and fully operational as<br />

<strong>of</strong> the date <strong>of</strong> application. The Applicant intends to file an application with the Federal Reserve Bank for the formation <strong>of</strong> a bank<br />

holding company.<br />

The Applicant’s business model espouses the use <strong>of</strong> multiple delivery channels (integrated model) to service its customer base<br />

including: a traditional retail bank site and supermarket branch network, as well as, a fully transactional web site and customer call<br />

center.<br />

Financial History and Condition<br />

The Applicant has provided reasonable support for asset and liability projections. Moreover, the proposed investment in fixed assets<br />

is within regulatory guidelines. Organizational expenses, while seemingly excessive, are fully covered by the initial level <strong>of</strong> capital.<br />

While the finding on this statutory factor is favorable, one open supervisory item remains. This pertains to the submission <strong>of</strong><br />

acceptable agreements covering the two proposed related party transactions. Said related party transactions should ensure that the<br />

resulting expenses to the insured institution are on terms prevailing in the market for similar services performed and/or due not result<br />

in any economic disadvantage or consequence. Related party transactions are summarized on page 8 <strong>of</strong> this Report.<br />

Adequacy <strong>of</strong> the Capital Structure<br />

The Applicant has provided for a strong initial capitalization base. Such capital is commensurate with the inherent risks <strong>of</strong> the<br />

business plan and sufficient for the projected growth <strong>of</strong> the institution. Year three pr<strong>of</strong>orma leverage ratio amounts to 8.82%. While<br />

the finding on this factor is favorable, it is contingent on the execution <strong>of</strong> the licensing (lease) agreements for the in store branches<br />

with Albertsons, Inc.<br />

Future Earnings Prospects<br />

The Applicant’s business model suggests that it can attain adequate pr<strong>of</strong>itability. This pr<strong>of</strong>itability is based viable assumptions, which<br />

are comparable to various banking peer groups. The finding on this factor is favorable.<br />

<strong>FDIC</strong> 6510/10 (02-2002) 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!