11.10.2013 Views

Risk Management Manual of Examination Policies - FDIC

Risk Management Manual of Examination Policies - FDIC

Risk Management Manual of Examination Policies - FDIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

REPORT OF EXAMINATION INSTRUCTIONS Section 16.1<br />

PURPOSE<br />

RISK MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT<br />

This page is used to concisely detail risk management deficiencies, recommendations, and related management<br />

responses that do not rise to the level <strong>of</strong> significance to be detailed on the ECC page, but are material enough to<br />

include within the Report. Significance can be determined by how relevant each deficiency and recommendation is<br />

in relation to supporting/justifying the CAMELS component ratings assigned.<br />

GENERAL<br />

Each question can be answered three ways: “Yes,” “No,” or “Generally, yes.” In 1- and 2-rated institutions, it is<br />

expected that most answers will either be “Yes” or “Generally, yes.”<br />

“Yes” answers require no further narrative.<br />

“Generally, yes” answers may be appropriate when risk management weaknesses are identified or apparent<br />

violations are cited that do not rise to the level <strong>of</strong> significance to be addressed on the ECC page. Comments<br />

regarding these items should be concise and include management’s response.<br />

“No” answers will primarily be supported by commentary on the ECC page, not with commentary on the RMA<br />

page. (The RMA page comment would simply highlight the weakness and refer the reader to the ECC page.)<br />

Note that in some cases, coverage <strong>of</strong> related matters will be split between the ECC and RMA pages. Example: A<br />

bank’s Loan Policy is inadequate for several primary reasons. In addition, a number <strong>of</strong> less significant policyrelated<br />

weaknesses are identified that, alone, would not justify considering the Policy inadequate. In this scenario,<br />

an appropriate RMA Question #2 response is detailed below.<br />

No. As indicated on the <strong>Examination</strong> Comments and Conclusions (ECC) page, underwriting and<br />

credit administration relating to acquisition and development lending are deficient. Additionally,<br />

the Loan Policy could be strengthened by:<br />

• Addressing minimum documentation requirements relating to home lending;<br />

• Developing minimum liquidity and net worth requirements for unsecured lending; and,<br />

• Modifying accounts receivable lending guidance to be consistent with actual practices.<br />

President Smith agreed to modify the Loan Policy.<br />

RISK MANAGEMENT QUESTIONS<br />

Note: The listings shown under each question are for illustrative purposes only and are not all-inclusive.<br />

DSC <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Examination</strong> <strong>Policies</strong> 16.1-11 Report <strong>of</strong> <strong>Examination</strong> Instructions (12-04)<br />

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!