11.10.2013 Views

Risk Management Manual of Examination Policies - FDIC

Risk Management Manual of Examination Policies - FDIC

Risk Management Manual of Examination Policies - FDIC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVES Section 3.3<br />

passive strategies, due to their higher transaction volume<br />

and complex analysis.<br />

An interest-rate expectations strategy is an attempt to<br />

maximize return based on a forecast <strong>of</strong> future interest rate<br />

movements. An example <strong>of</strong> this strategy consists <strong>of</strong><br />

adjusting the duration <strong>of</strong> a bond portfolio to take advantage<br />

<strong>of</strong> expected changes in interest rates. The success <strong>of</strong> this<br />

strategy depends on the accurate forecasting <strong>of</strong> future<br />

interest rates.<br />

An individual security selection strategy is an attempt to<br />

identify individual instruments that will outperform other<br />

similarly rated instruments. The most common <strong>of</strong> this type<br />

<strong>of</strong> strategy identifies an issue as undervalued because its<br />

yield is higher that that <strong>of</strong> comparably rated issues or its<br />

yield is expected to decline because credit analysis<br />

indicates the issue’s rating will change. The success <strong>of</strong> this<br />

strategy depends on superior skill in performing credit<br />

analysis. An active strategy assumes that the investor will<br />

attempt to outperform the market.<br />

Many other investment strategies may be employed without<br />

measuring risk on a portfolio basis. Two commonly used<br />

active strategies include yield curve strategies and yield<br />

spread strategies.<br />

Yield curve strategies involve the positioning <strong>of</strong> fixedincome<br />

portfolios to capitalize on or protect against<br />

expected changes in the shape <strong>of</strong> the Treasury yield curve.<br />

These strategies may be referred to as “riding the yield<br />

curve.” Three common yield curve strategies are bullet<br />

strategies, ladder strategies, and barbell strategies.<br />

A bullet portfolio is constructed so that the maturity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

securities is highly concentrated at one point on the yield<br />

curve. A laddered portfolio spreads instruments (and<br />

reinvestment risk) across the maturity spectrum and<br />

provides regular cash flows. A typical laddered portfolio is<br />

constructed with approximately equal percentages <strong>of</strong> the<br />

portfolio maturing at different segments <strong>of</strong> the yield curve.<br />

A barbell portfolio concentrates instruments at the short<br />

term and long term extremes <strong>of</strong> the maturity spectrum.<br />

Barbell strategies can be used to take advantage <strong>of</strong>, or<br />

compensate for, non-parallel shifts in the yield curve.<br />

These strategies are based on the theory that the value <strong>of</strong><br />

long-term bonds will appreciate more when long-term<br />

market interest rates fall, than shorter-term bonds<br />

depreciate even if short-term market interest rates<br />

simultaneously rise (a non-parallel yield curve shift). The<br />

ability to reinvest the proceeds from maturing short-term<br />

bonds at higher short-term rates provides this value. The<br />

actual performance <strong>of</strong> a barbell strategy will depend upon<br />

both the type <strong>of</strong> non-parallel shift (e.g. steepening or<br />

flattening) and the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the shift. For example,<br />

barbell strategies will be disadvantageous if long-term<br />

market interest rates rise while short-term rates remain<br />

unchanged.<br />

Yield spread 3 strategies involve the positioning <strong>of</strong> fixedincome<br />

portfolios to pr<strong>of</strong>it on expected changes in yield<br />

spreads between sectors <strong>of</strong> the bond market. These sectors<br />

can vary by type <strong>of</strong> issuer (such as Treasury, agencies,<br />

corporates, and mortgage-backed securities), quality or<br />

credit (such as Treasuries, triple A, double A), coupon<br />

(such as high-coupon/premium bonds, low<br />

coupon/discount bonds), and maturity (such as short,<br />

intermediate, or long term). Spreads can change for a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> reasons. For example, the spread between top<br />

quality and lower quality bonds tends to narrow as business<br />

conditions improve, and widen when business conditions<br />

deteriorate. Making changes in the portfolio to take<br />

advantage <strong>of</strong> changes in spreads will <strong>of</strong>ten result in<br />

accepting additional credit risk or extension risk.<br />

Cash flow matching strategies attempt to match the cash<br />

flow requirements <strong>of</strong> a bank’s liabilities with the cash<br />

flows provided by specific investments. This approach is<br />

also known as dedicating a portfolio. Bonds are selected<br />

with maturities, principal amounts and coupon payments<br />

that match the bank’s liability payment stream.<br />

Theoretically, this cash flow matching process can be<br />

continued until all liabilities have been matched by the<br />

cash flows from securities in the portfolio. Interest rate<br />

risk reduction is the primary advantage <strong>of</strong> this strategy,<br />

since a known amount <strong>of</strong> cash sufficient to fund the<br />

required payment schedule will be generated with<br />

certainty. The inability to reposition the securities being<br />

used to match liabilities, the possibility <strong>of</strong> bonds being<br />

called, and the possibility <strong>of</strong> bonds going into default are<br />

the primary disadvantages <strong>of</strong> this strategy. Cash flow<br />

matching strategies are becoming more popular in banks<br />

that use FHLB borrowings.<br />

Using total return measurement in determining an<br />

investment strategy better incorporates the investor’s<br />

interest rate expectations over time than either a simple<br />

yield to maturity or yield to call investment selection. The<br />

total return for an individual bond consists <strong>of</strong> the change in<br />

the market value over the measurement period; the coupon<br />

received; and the reinvestment interest on the cash flows<br />

received during the measurement period. For bond<br />

portfolios, the total return is the weighted average <strong>of</strong> the<br />

3 Yield spread is the yield premium <strong>of</strong> one bond over<br />

another. Traditional analysis <strong>of</strong> the yield premium for a<br />

non-U.S. Treasury bond involves calculating the difference<br />

between the yield-to-maturity <strong>of</strong> the bond in question and<br />

the yield-to-maturity <strong>of</strong> a U.S. Treasury security with a<br />

comparable maturity.<br />

DSC <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Examination</strong> <strong>Policies</strong> 3.3-20 Securities and Derivatives (12-04)<br />

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!