11.10.2013 Views

the case of the synthetic dye industry, 1857–1914 - Maastricht ...

the case of the synthetic dye industry, 1857–1914 - Maastricht ...

the case of the synthetic dye industry, 1857–1914 - Maastricht ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Comparing evolutionary dynamics across different national settings 189<br />

that being a high-tech <strong>industry</strong> is not sufficient to cause a quick shake-out. Social<br />

context matters too, as we describe in more detail below.<br />

Relatively small fluctuations in Britain<br />

The British pattern in <strong>the</strong> early years <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> syn<strong>the</strong>tic <strong>dye</strong> <strong>industry</strong> resembles more<br />

<strong>the</strong> S-shaped curve that has been found in studies <strong>of</strong> diffusion <strong>of</strong> innovations,<br />

diseases, or fashions. The entry slope for Britain is not as steep as that <strong>of</strong> France.<br />

Britain, with a peak <strong>of</strong> 16 firms, never reached <strong>the</strong> <strong>industry</strong> participation level <strong>of</strong><br />

France. The period <strong>of</strong> rapid growth took place from 1859 to 1863. Britain also<br />

experienced a decline <strong>of</strong> syn<strong>the</strong>tic <strong>dye</strong> firms from 1864 to 1866, but <strong>the</strong> decline<br />

was not nearly as dramatic as in <strong>the</strong> <strong>case</strong> <strong>of</strong> France, where one can truly speak<br />

<strong>of</strong> a shakeout. Existing historiography emphasizes that Britain was <strong>the</strong> leading<br />

country in <strong>the</strong> early syn<strong>the</strong>tic <strong>dye</strong> <strong>industry</strong>, with France closely following and<br />

Germany far behind (Beer, 1959; Travis, 1993). Our data show, however, that<br />

France was not trailing at all. These findings call for a reevaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> early<br />

period in <strong>the</strong> syn<strong>the</strong>tic <strong>dye</strong> <strong>industry</strong> (see Fig. 3). Growth in France was earlier<br />

and quicker, and more firms participated in <strong>the</strong> French <strong>industry</strong> in <strong>the</strong> very early<br />

years. Figure 4, which plots <strong>the</strong> fraction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> global firm population that resided<br />

in each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> five major countries in a given year, makes this point forcefully.<br />

Already in 1858 <strong>the</strong> French share in <strong>the</strong> global firm population surpassed <strong>the</strong><br />

British share, and until 1870 <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> syn<strong>the</strong>tic <strong>dye</strong> firms in Britain was<br />

lower than in France. The British <strong>industry</strong> reached <strong>the</strong> lowest (relative) level<br />

in <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> firms in 1864. From 1864 to 1914 <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> <strong>industry</strong><br />

participants remained fairly constant in Britain. The British <strong>industry</strong> stabilized<br />

earlier than <strong>the</strong> French, but it is striking how <strong>the</strong> levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>industry</strong> participation<br />

became similar in <strong>the</strong> two countries from <strong>the</strong> 1870s onward, with Britain having<br />

a slightly larger number <strong>of</strong> firms than France.<br />

Germany: Long rise in <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> firms<br />

Germany also displays a steep rise in <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> firms between 1858 and<br />

1863. The number increased from 2 firms in 1858 to about 22 in 1863. Existing<br />

historiography does not discuss this early entry <strong>of</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> firms<br />

in Germany, in part because <strong>the</strong>se early German entrants did not possess <strong>the</strong><br />

visibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> leading British and French firms during this period. The timing<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> German rise is about <strong>the</strong> same as in France, but Germany began at a<br />

lower level in 1858. The striking difference between Germany, on <strong>the</strong> one hand,<br />

and Britain and France, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, is that <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> firms in Germany<br />

continued to increase after 1863. The lasting growth in <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> German<br />

firms is <strong>the</strong> reason <strong>the</strong> dramatic shakeout that occurred in France does not show<br />

up at <strong>the</strong> global level. After a short consolidation phase (1873-76), <strong>the</strong> growth<br />

continued from 1877 to 1897. In this period <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> firms increased as<br />

a step function, alternating between periods <strong>of</strong> rapid growth and stabilization,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!