11.10.2013 Views

Taking matters into third hands: intermediaries and the organization ...

Taking matters into third hands: intermediaries and the organization ...

Taking matters into third hands: intermediaries and the organization ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Taking</strong> <strong>matters</strong> <strong>into</strong> <strong>third</strong> <strong>h<strong>and</strong>s</strong>: <strong>intermediaries</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>organization</strong> of<br />

<strong>the</strong> creative economy<br />

Organizers: Doreen Jakob (University of North Carolina Chapel Hill) <strong>and</strong> Bas van Heur<br />

(Maastricht University)<br />

For <strong>the</strong> past twenty years geographers have been analyzing <strong>the</strong> meaning, role <strong>and</strong><br />

importance of <strong>the</strong> creative economy. It is heralded as a job <strong>and</strong> wealth creator <strong>and</strong> as a<br />

prominent tool for urban <strong>and</strong> regional revitalization. Whe<strong>the</strong>r one agrees with <strong>the</strong>se<br />

assertions or not, <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>and</strong> ethics of <strong>the</strong> creative economy will largely<br />

depend on <strong>the</strong> <strong>intermediaries</strong> that shape <strong>and</strong> regulate it. While much attention has<br />

been paid recently to <strong>the</strong> political projects that introduce a focus on <strong>the</strong> creative<br />

economy, less is known about <strong>the</strong> <strong>intermediaries</strong> that organize <strong>and</strong> govern it. When<br />

implementing dominant policy imaginaries, <strong>intermediaries</strong> translate <strong>and</strong> transform<br />

<strong>the</strong>m in often unexpected ways.<br />

Various <strong>intermediaries</strong> shaping <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> creative economy can be<br />

identified, including: arts <strong>and</strong> cultural councils, policy networks, economic development<br />

agencies, foundations <strong>and</strong> unions to arts collectives, cultural centers, creative industries<br />

incubators, festivals <strong>and</strong> tradeshows as well as crowd-sourcing <strong>and</strong> web 2.0<br />

technologies or marketing <strong>and</strong> consumption websites. All <strong>the</strong>se <strong>intermediaries</strong> are<br />

bound toge<strong>the</strong>r by <strong>the</strong>ir critical involvement in <strong>and</strong> shaping of <strong>the</strong> production <strong>and</strong><br />

consumption of creative goods <strong>and</strong> services.<br />

This session aims to investigate <strong>intermediaries</strong> <strong>and</strong> to fur<strong>the</strong>r explore <strong>the</strong>ir role in<br />

producing <strong>the</strong> creative economy. Above all, this session aims to provide a forum to not<br />

only investigate <strong>the</strong>se <strong>the</strong>mes but also to establish a basis for future research on<br />

<strong>intermediaries</strong> in <strong>the</strong> creative economy.<br />

Session 1: Conceptualizing Intermediaries in <strong>the</strong> Creative Economy<br />

Chair: Bas van Heur<br />

Presenters:<br />

- Pacey Foster (University of Massachusetts Boston) <strong>and</strong> Richard Ocejo (John Jay<br />

College, CUNY), Gatekeepers, tastemakers <strong>and</strong> co-producers: Underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>the</strong><br />

changing role of cultural <strong>intermediaries</strong> in <strong>the</strong> new creative economy<br />

- Calvin Taylor (University of Leeds), Between Culture, Policy <strong>and</strong> Industry: The<br />

Ambiguities of Intermediation in <strong>the</strong> Creative Economy<br />

- Chris Gibson (University of Wollongong), Academics as expert <strong>intermediaries</strong> in <strong>the</strong><br />

creative economy: negotiating knowledges <strong>and</strong> positions of authority<br />

- Rebecca Gordon-Nesbitt (University of Strathclyde) (tbc), Methods for researching<br />

<strong>intermediaries</strong><br />

1


- Tone Haraldsen (Institute of Transport Economics) <strong>and</strong> Atle Hauge (Eastern Norway<br />

Research Institute), Consumerpower in <strong>the</strong> experience economy<br />

Session 2: Urban Hierarchies<br />

Chair: Doreen Jakob<br />

Presenters:<br />

- Elizabeth Currid-Halkett (University of Sou<strong>the</strong>rn California) <strong>and</strong> Allen J Scott (UCLA),<br />

The Geography of Celebrity <strong>and</strong> Glamour: Economy, Culture <strong>and</strong> Desire in <strong>the</strong> City<br />

- Robert Kloosterman (AISSR, University of Amsterdam) <strong>and</strong> Mariangela Lavanga<br />

(AISSR, University of Amsterdam), Global Urban Hierarchies <strong>and</strong> Cultural Industries.<br />

A Comparison of <strong>the</strong> Development of Cultural Industries in Amsterdam, Genoa,<br />

London, Los Angeles, Milan, New York, <strong>and</strong> Zurich, 1900-2000<br />

- Dominic J. Power (Uppsala University) <strong>and</strong> Mark Lorenzen (Copenhagen Business<br />

School), Trusty Places <strong>and</strong> Quality-Based Competition: The Geographies of Cultural-<br />

Product Origins <strong>and</strong> Outlets<br />

- Bas Van Heur (Maastricht University), Mapping <strong>the</strong> Geographies of Policy Change:<br />

Creative Industries in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

Session 3: Government Policies <strong>and</strong> Strategies<br />

Chair: Benjamin Schultz<br />

Presenters:<br />

- Jules Channer (University of Exeter), In search of solid ground: state <strong>intermediaries</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> creative industries<br />

- Galina Gornostaeva (University of Greenwich) <strong>and</strong> Noel Campbell (University of<br />

Greenwich), Publicly funded <strong>intermediaries</strong> in <strong>the</strong> British film industry <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

paradox of embeddedness: <strong>the</strong> example of <strong>the</strong> Film Council<br />

- Cheryl Hughes, Study of Local Arts Agencies: A Case for Local Government Support of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Arts<br />

- Justin O'Connor (Queensl<strong>and</strong> University of Technology) <strong>and</strong> Xin Gu (Queensl<strong>and</strong><br />

University of Technology), designing creative clusters in China - a western model?<br />

Session 4: Place <strong>and</strong> Path Dependencies<br />

Chair: Galina Gornostaeva<br />

Presenters:<br />

- Carl Grodach (University of Texas Arlington), Cultural Planning in a Creative City: The<br />

Role of Context, Institutions, <strong>and</strong> Process<br />

- Norma Rantisi (Concordia University) <strong>and</strong> Deborah Leslie (University of Toronto), The<br />

Role of Localized Institutions in 'Path Creation': <strong>the</strong> Case of <strong>the</strong> Cirque du Soleil<br />

2


- Naomi Bartz (University of Chicago), The Emergence of a Neighborhood-Level<br />

Creative Economy <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Various Intermediaries that Shape it: Divergent Models,<br />

Uneasy Alliances, <strong>and</strong> Unexpected Tensions across Stakeholder Groups in a Pluralistic<br />

Political Arena<br />

- Özge Öner (Jönköping International Business School), Location of Recreation: A<br />

probability presence approach<br />

Session 5: Inside/Outside <strong>the</strong> Creative Economy I<br />

Chair: Carl Grodach<br />

Presenters:<br />

- Tara Vinodrai (University of Waterloo), Constructing creativity: Design,<br />

<strong>intermediaries</strong> <strong>and</strong> institutions in Canada <strong>and</strong> Denmark<br />

- Benjamin Shultz (University of Tennessee), The Alternative Art Worlds of <strong>the</strong> Indie<br />

<strong>and</strong> DiY Movements<br />

- Karenjit Clare (University of Oxford), Reproducing Gender Divisions: The Role of<br />

Headhunters in <strong>the</strong> Creative Economy<br />

- Jeffrey S. Boggs (Brock University), The evolution of <strong>intermediaries</strong> in Canada's book<br />

trade<br />

Session 6: Inside/Outside <strong>the</strong> Creative Economy II<br />

Chair: Karenjit Clare<br />

Presenters:<br />

- Doreen Jakob (University of North Carolina Chapel Hill), Arts practices in Flux: new<br />

artist collectives for a creative economy<br />

- Ca<strong>the</strong>rine Morel (Kingston University), The role of art fairs in <strong>the</strong> contemporary art<br />

galleries' acquisition <strong>and</strong> management of legitimacy<br />

- Ned Rossiter (University of Nottingham Ningbo), Logistics <strong>and</strong> Informal Circuits of<br />

Labour in China<br />

- Harvey Molotch (New York University), Public Restrooms as Taboo Scenarios<br />

Session 7: The Future of Creative Economy Research<br />

Chair: Bas van Heur <strong>and</strong> Doreen Jakob<br />

Panelists:<br />

- Steve Millington<br />

- Deborah Leslie<br />

- Justin O'Connor<br />

- Tara Vinodrai<br />

- Graeme Evans<br />

3


Submitted Abstracts<br />

Session 1: Conceptualizing Intermediaries in <strong>the</strong> Creative Economy<br />

Gatekeepers, tastemakers <strong>and</strong> co-producers: Underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> changing role of<br />

cultural <strong>intermediaries</strong> in <strong>the</strong> new creative economy<br />

Pacey C Foster, University of Massachusetts Boston pacey.foster@umb.edu<br />

Richard Ocejo, John Jay College, CUNY rocejo@jjay.cuny.edu<br />

Scholarship on creative economies, art worlds <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> production of culture all include<br />

frequent references to <strong>intermediaries</strong> who manage <strong>the</strong> search for, selection, production<br />

<strong>and</strong> promotion of creative products. Sometimes called gatekeepers <strong>and</strong> sometimes<br />

cultural <strong>intermediaries</strong>, existing scholarship recognizes <strong>the</strong> importance of <strong>the</strong>se<br />

functions but has rarely studied <strong>the</strong>m systematically. As a result, <strong>the</strong>re remains<br />

ambiguity about how cultural <strong>intermediaries</strong> should be defined <strong>and</strong> what roles <strong>the</strong>y play<br />

in creative economies. In this paper, we contrast Bourdieu's definition of cultural<br />

<strong>intermediaries</strong> with definitions drawn from art worlds <strong>and</strong> cultural industries<br />

scholarship. Through this review we identify <strong>and</strong> distinguish among a diverse set of<br />

roles played by cultural <strong>intermediaries</strong> including search, selection, co-production,<br />

tastemaking <strong>and</strong> sense-making. We conclude by describing several contemporary<br />

contexts that illustrate rapid changes in <strong>the</strong> traditional roles played by cultural<br />

<strong>intermediaries</strong>. In particular, we argue that changes in <strong>the</strong> production <strong>and</strong> distribution<br />

of creative products <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> simultaneous fragmentation <strong>and</strong> globalization of markets<br />

are generating complex new roles for cultural <strong>intermediaries</strong>. In <strong>the</strong>se spaces, cultural<br />

<strong>intermediaries</strong> are both separate from <strong>and</strong> at <strong>the</strong> same embedded within systems of<br />

mass production. These new l<strong>and</strong>scapes problematize <strong>the</strong> traditional relationship<br />

between producers, <strong>intermediaries</strong> <strong>and</strong> consumers as niche products <strong>and</strong> experiences<br />

are increasingly being disseminated through mass forms of digital <strong>and</strong> social media that<br />

include as much as <strong>the</strong>y exclude.<br />

Between Culture, Policy <strong>and</strong> Industry: The Ambiguities of Intermediation in <strong>the</strong><br />

Creative Economy<br />

Calvin Taylor, University of Leeds c.f.taylor@leeds.ac.uk<br />

The networked nature of late-capitalist <strong>organization</strong> has raised important questions<br />

about both <strong>the</strong> efficacy <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> legitimacy of <strong>the</strong> role undertaken by intermediary<br />

agents. These questions are particularly acute in <strong>the</strong> context of <strong>the</strong> governance of <strong>the</strong><br />

creative economy for three reasons. The first arises from <strong>the</strong> radical scalar asymmetry<br />

of <strong>the</strong> creative economy itself: what does intermediation mean when economic activity<br />

is granulated according to two predominant levels: at TNC scale at one end, <strong>and</strong>, SME<br />

(<strong>and</strong> micro) scale at <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r? The second arises from <strong>the</strong> discontinuity between policy<br />

4


short-h<strong>and</strong> - for example '<strong>the</strong> creative industries' (as a category of administration) – <strong>and</strong><br />

– its economically idiosyncratic (<strong>and</strong> often-times policy-indifferent) industrial referent.<br />

The <strong>third</strong> arises from <strong>the</strong> spatial ambiguities of <strong>the</strong> creative economy itself. It simply<br />

does not know what kind of space it is: social, geographic, political or economic? This<br />

paper argues that current thinking about <strong>the</strong> role of <strong>intermediaries</strong> appears to<br />

underplay <strong>the</strong> significance of <strong>the</strong>se three discontinuities, leading to an overly<br />

functionalist (institutionalized) account of intermediation with respect to role, an overlyconsensualist<br />

account with respect to governance <strong>and</strong> legitimacy, <strong>and</strong> an under<strong>the</strong>orised<br />

account of intermediary agency. As a consequence, <strong>the</strong> practice of<br />

intermediation appears radically divergent from <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory, leaving intermediary<br />

agencies to navigate <strong>the</strong> ambiguities of <strong>the</strong>se three sets of discontinuities. The paper<br />

uses cultural political economy to examine <strong>the</strong> discursive construction of <strong>the</strong>se<br />

ambiguities <strong>and</strong> draws on <strong>the</strong> author's ten years experience as a Director of an<br />

intermediary agency.<br />

Academics as expert <strong>intermediaries</strong> in <strong>the</strong> creative economy: negotiating knowledges<br />

<strong>and</strong> positions of authority<br />

Chris Gibson, University of Wollongong cgibson@uow.edu.au<br />

Some time ago (Gibson <strong>and</strong> Klocker 2004, in Area), I wrote critically about <strong>the</strong> role of<br />

academics researching <strong>the</strong> creative economy in <strong>the</strong> creative economy itself. Academics<br />

researching <strong>the</strong> creative economy are a key part of <strong>the</strong> creative economy, expert<br />

<strong>intermediaries</strong> dispersing knowledges through communities of influence, within policy<br />

circles, <strong>and</strong> via 'celebrity' circuits of appearances <strong>and</strong> consultancies. Through <strong>the</strong>se<br />

means, I argued, normative, <strong>and</strong> often quite neoliberal, ideas of creative economy gain<br />

traction. In this paper, I reflect upon more recent experiences conducting research on<br />

<strong>the</strong> creative economy as part of two Australian government-funded projects. In both<br />

projects, partner organisations (local councils, especially) contributed funding, <strong>and</strong> ideas<br />

for research. There were moments in <strong>the</strong> projects where my position as academic<br />

'expert' was validated by o<strong>the</strong>rs, <strong>and</strong> 'performed' by me, in ways that kept intact<br />

qualities of <strong>the</strong> academic-as-expert intermediary. Advice sought from local councils<br />

invited performances of expertise - especially when considering methods for analysing<br />

<strong>the</strong> creative economy. Yet too, <strong>the</strong>re were opportunities for <strong>the</strong> academic-as-expert<br />

intermediary to act as critical gatekeeper, especially when assessing <strong>the</strong> relevance (or<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rwise) of normative, Anglo-American conceptions of <strong>the</strong> creative economy.<br />

Accepting <strong>the</strong> terms of being academic-as-expert intermediary meant negotiating<br />

expected performances, <strong>and</strong> intervening sometimes in global flows of knowledge about<br />

<strong>the</strong> creative economy, for political-ethical reasons – discarding irrelevant <strong>the</strong>ories, <strong>and</strong><br />

differentiating policy jargon from genuine insight. What <strong>matters</strong> is less that academics<br />

are expert <strong>intermediaries</strong>, <strong>and</strong> more that this position of privilege is acknowledged <strong>and</strong><br />

productively negotiated towards progressive political ends.<br />

5


Consumerpower in <strong>the</strong> experience economy<br />

Atle Hauge, Eastern Norway Research Institute atle.hauge@ostforsk.no<br />

Tone Haraldsen, Institute of Transport Economics toh@toi.no<br />

Recently <strong>the</strong>re has been a growing interest in <strong>the</strong> consumers' role in <strong>the</strong> innovation<br />

process, <strong>the</strong>ir role as powerful agents in <strong>the</strong> br<strong>and</strong>ing process, as important sources of<br />

information etc. This is a much anticipated development, since, especially within<br />

economic geography, <strong>the</strong> role of <strong>the</strong> consumers is under <strong>the</strong>orized <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re is also a<br />

lack of empirically based studies on this topic. However, one should not forget that even<br />

though consumers play a new <strong>and</strong> important role in contemporary economy, <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

still obvious <strong>and</strong> important differences between consumers <strong>and</strong> producers, in particular<br />

when it come to distribution of knowledge <strong>and</strong> information. One way to analyze <strong>the</strong>se<br />

differences is to look at <strong>the</strong> key players in <strong>the</strong> knowledge distribution process, vital<br />

actors holding strategic positions - <strong>the</strong> gatekeepers <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> tastemakers. These actors<br />

play <strong>the</strong> role as mediators of external communication, <strong>and</strong> are powerful agents in<br />

production, innovation <strong>and</strong> distribution of goods <strong>and</strong> services. Based on recent research<br />

on <strong>the</strong> role <strong>the</strong> cultural industries play in <strong>the</strong> so called experience economy, we use<br />

empirical material from <strong>the</strong>se industries to illustrate our argument, <strong>and</strong> in particular one<br />

of Norway's most important music festival. The empirical findings show that <strong>the</strong> power<br />

relations that govern <strong>the</strong> flows of influence <strong>and</strong> knowledge are quite complex, but never<br />

<strong>the</strong> less important in <strong>the</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of relations underpinning today's knowledge<br />

intensive economy.<br />

Session 2: Urban Hierarchies<br />

The Geography of Celebrity <strong>and</strong> Glamour: Economy, Culture <strong>and</strong> Desire in <strong>the</strong> City<br />

Elizabeth Currid-Halkett, University of Sou<strong>the</strong>rn California currid@usc.edu<br />

Allen J Scott, UCLA ajscott@ucla.edu<br />

We have entered a new phase of capitalism <strong>and</strong> urbanization characterized by <strong>the</strong><br />

emergence of a cognitive-cultural economy. This economy is significantly focused on<br />

diverse forms of cultural production that are highly commodified <strong>and</strong> generate<br />

substantial revenue. These forms of production, <strong>the</strong>refore, have evolved from<br />

"symbolic capital" to meaningful economic forces. The cognitive-cultural economy in<br />

general <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> cultural economy in particular engage in a "winner-take-all" market<br />

whereby <strong>the</strong> respective industries <strong>and</strong> workers are concentrated in major metropolitan<br />

areas. The cultural economy is also <strong>the</strong> locus of a peculiar fraction of <strong>the</strong> labor force<br />

characterized by high levels of celebrity <strong>and</strong> glamour, in which <strong>the</strong> hierarchy among<br />

metropolitan areas is particularly visible. This fraction is both an urban social<br />

phenomenon in its own right <strong>and</strong> a critical element, both as labor <strong>and</strong> as icon, of <strong>the</strong><br />

cultural economy as such. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong> top talent within <strong>the</strong> cultural economy is<br />

not just a social elite composed of "stars" <strong>and</strong> "celebrities" but also a highly localized<br />

6


social phenomenon. While celebrity <strong>and</strong> glamour (in various historically-specific guises)<br />

have always been present in large cities, <strong>the</strong>y have today assumed a highly distinctive<br />

functional <strong>and</strong> symbolic form that is at <strong>the</strong> same time of unprecedented significance in<br />

<strong>the</strong> overall dynamic of urbanization <strong>and</strong> urban life. Those cities which capture <strong>the</strong><br />

majority of glamour capital tend to hold strong positions in <strong>the</strong> global economy as this<br />

attribute tends to operate as strong attractor for, while also being partially created by,<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r forms of capital.<br />

Global Urban Hierarchies <strong>and</strong> Cultural Industries. A Comparison of <strong>the</strong> Development of<br />

Cultural Industries in Amsterdam, Genoa, London, Los Angeles, Milan, New York, <strong>and</strong><br />

Zurich, 1900-2000<br />

Robert Kloosterman, AISSR/University of Amsterdam r.c.kloosterman@uva.nl<br />

Mariangela Lavanga, AISSR/Universiteit van Amsterdam m.lavanga@uva.nl<br />

Why are some cities doing better in terms of cultural industries than some o<strong>the</strong>r cities?<br />

Size, as is often <strong>the</strong> case, <strong>matters</strong>. We, however, want to go beyond that <strong>and</strong> explore to<br />

what extent <strong>the</strong> position in <strong>the</strong> global urban hierarchy <strong>matters</strong> in determining <strong>the</strong> role<br />

<strong>and</strong> contribution of cultural industries in cities. We hypo<strong>the</strong>sised that not just <strong>the</strong><br />

current position in <strong>the</strong> global hierarchy is important, but-through path-dependent<br />

processes-also <strong>the</strong> position in <strong>the</strong> past. We focus on two groups of cities. The first group<br />

comprises those cities which now occupy a similar position in <strong>the</strong> global urban system.<br />

The second group of cities concerns those cities which at some point of <strong>the</strong>ir history<br />

have been <strong>the</strong> financial <strong>and</strong> economic centre of <strong>the</strong> (western) global urban system<br />

(Genoa, Amsterdam, London, <strong>and</strong> New York). According to our findings, <strong>the</strong> past indeed<br />

<strong>matters</strong>, but <strong>the</strong> present even more.<br />

Trusty Places <strong>and</strong> Quality-Based Competition: The Geographies of Cultural-Product<br />

Origins <strong>and</strong> Outlets<br />

Dominic J. Power, Uppsala University dominic.power@kultgeog.uu.se<br />

Mark Lorenzen, Copenhagen Business School ml.ivs@cbs.dk<br />

In cultural-product markets, from fashion to film, <strong>the</strong> role of quality <strong>and</strong> a reputation for<br />

quality is often a considerable asset. This paper addresses <strong>the</strong> notion that in order to<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> sustainability of cultural industry clusters we must take <strong>into</strong> account <strong>the</strong><br />

idea that it is not simply <strong>the</strong> places that generate innovative or novel creative ideas that<br />

win out. The production of quality <strong>and</strong> its recognition by consumers is also a crucial<br />

process. In this paper we discuss what quality in <strong>the</strong> cultural industries means <strong>and</strong> how<br />

it shapes competitive strategy at <strong>the</strong> level of both <strong>the</strong> firm <strong>and</strong> cluster. In particular we<br />

address how two types of place are invoked in quality-based competition. First, we look<br />

at examples of places of origin. These are often, but not always, <strong>the</strong> production <strong>and</strong><br />

origination locality where quality products are produced. Second, we examine how<br />

places of outlet <strong>and</strong> consumption are crucial sites for <strong>the</strong> negotiation <strong>and</strong> dissemination<br />

7


of quality. In both cases we stress reflexive processes of building trust around products<br />

<strong>and</strong> places. We argue that <strong>the</strong> impact of globalization on <strong>the</strong> cultural industries means<br />

that complex hybrid geographies exist <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong>se forge deep interconnections <strong>and</strong><br />

interdependencies between places of origin <strong>and</strong> outlet.<br />

Mapping <strong>the</strong> Geographies of Policy Change: Creative Industries in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

Bas van Heur, Maastricht University b.vanheur@maastrichtuniversity.nl<br />

Drawing on text analysis of policy documents <strong>and</strong> interviews with policy makers <strong>and</strong><br />

independent consultants, in this paper I contribute to recent relational debates on<br />

policy transfer by mapping <strong>the</strong> geographies of policy change in <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong> creative<br />

industries in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

Emerging in <strong>the</strong> early 2000s, <strong>the</strong> debate on <strong>the</strong> creative industries enabled a variety of<br />

actors to stake out <strong>the</strong>ir claims as to what actually constitutes <strong>the</strong> creative industries.<br />

Strongly influenced on <strong>the</strong> surface by Richard Florida's creative class argument, <strong>the</strong><br />

mainstream of <strong>the</strong> Dutch debate on <strong>the</strong> creative industries is a more hybrid affair:<br />

including references to Florida, but also drawing on geography debates on<br />

agglomeration as well as sector-based definitions developed by <strong>the</strong> applied research<br />

<strong>organization</strong> TNO. Most recently, we can observe a shift towards a creative economy<br />

approach in which <strong>the</strong> creative industries become service providers facilitating<br />

innovation in o<strong>the</strong>r sectors of <strong>the</strong> economy. At <strong>the</strong> same time, consultants have<br />

emerged <strong>and</strong> have offered <strong>the</strong>ir advice to various Dutch cities. Only partly related to <strong>the</strong><br />

debate on <strong>the</strong> national level, <strong>the</strong>se consultants have developed a narrative more closely<br />

aligned with cultural policy <strong>and</strong> social welfare initiatives. In mapping <strong>the</strong>se shifting<br />

definitions <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> various actors involved, I make visible <strong>the</strong> networks of expertise that<br />

have shaped <strong>the</strong> debate on <strong>the</strong> Dutch creative industries <strong>and</strong> point to <strong>the</strong> in- <strong>and</strong><br />

exclusions that are <strong>the</strong> result of this particular social order. I conclude by speculating on<br />

<strong>the</strong> future of creative industries debates in <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rl<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

Session 3: Government Policies <strong>and</strong> Strategies<br />

In search of solid ground: state <strong>intermediaries</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> creative industries<br />

Jules Channer, University of Exeter jc338@exeter.ac.uk<br />

The paper examines <strong>the</strong> coherence, or o<strong>the</strong>rwise, of state governance of <strong>the</strong> creative<br />

industries, in relation to 'arms length' <strong>intermediaries</strong>, witnessed in <strong>the</strong> United Kingdom<br />

over <strong>the</strong> last decade. From New Labour's election in 1997, state-led initiatives were<br />

badged as 'creative industries', in pursuit of a Knowledge Based Economy (Jessop, 2008;<br />

Pratt, 2005), <strong>and</strong> proliferation of <strong>intermediaries</strong> <strong>and</strong> a 'joined up' mode of governance<br />

were introduced as <strong>the</strong> delivery mechanism. However, <strong>the</strong> notion of coherence, let<br />

alone policy completion, seems more ideological than achievable in <strong>the</strong> turbulent world<br />

8


of neoliberal politics (UK or elsewhere). Do <strong>intermediaries</strong> search endlessly for terra<br />

firma in a maelstrom, or do are connections made on solid ground?<br />

Focusing on <strong>the</strong> relationality of <strong>intermediaries</strong> <strong>and</strong> State vis-à-vis creative industry<br />

policy, <strong>the</strong> paper explores a geography of 'different moments' (Jones, 2009:2), in order<br />

to illuminate <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of <strong>intermediaries</strong>. Empirical analysis is based on doctoral<br />

study, <strong>and</strong> on professional experience of cultural development agencies. Drawing on<br />

Jones' notion of 'phase space', scalar governance (Goodwin et al, 2006) <strong>and</strong> Jessop's<br />

strategic relational approach (2001; 2008), I contend that: (1) spatial-temporal<br />

'moments' of coherence <strong>and</strong> 'solidity' emerge from multiple processes of state<br />

governance; (2) <strong>the</strong>se fixes are critical to State <strong>and</strong> <strong>intermediaries</strong> for (re)producing<br />

hierarchies <strong>and</strong> power relations, <strong>and</strong> (re)aligning political goals. I conclude that state<br />

entities are more than messengers of <strong>the</strong> State, but <strong>the</strong>ir devolved regulatory powers<br />

are fragile <strong>and</strong> transitory. Under New Labour, state <strong>intermediaries</strong> flourished - today<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are again in search of solid ground.<br />

Publicly funded <strong>intermediaries</strong> in <strong>the</strong> British film industry <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> paradox of<br />

embeddedness: <strong>the</strong> example of <strong>the</strong> Film Council<br />

Galina Gornostaeva, University of Greenwich g.gornostaeva@btinternet.com<br />

Noel Campbell, University of Greenwich noel.campbell2@btinternet.com<br />

The recent decision of <strong>the</strong> coalition government to abolish Film Council (UKFC) reasserts<br />

<strong>the</strong> question of <strong>the</strong> role that publicly funded <strong>intermediaries</strong> play in <strong>the</strong> development of<br />

<strong>the</strong> film industry in <strong>the</strong> UK. Dependence on <strong>the</strong> US majors, on <strong>the</strong> one h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> public<br />

funds, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, made British film industry fragmented <strong>and</strong> cottage-like in its<br />

organisation <strong>and</strong> performance. The economic tools of state governance such as<br />

incentives <strong>and</strong> tax regimes are controversial, promoting foreign inward investment<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than local industrial growth. UKFC, as its multiple predecessors, was an<br />

intermediary between small-scale, commercially weak film production <strong>and</strong> an<br />

anticipated consumer with specialised taste for 'British movie', creating artificial <strong>and</strong><br />

temporary marketplace. UKFC became <strong>the</strong> financier <strong>and</strong> a distributor for many<br />

independent projects in film supporting <strong>the</strong>ir development, production <strong>and</strong> exhibition.<br />

UKFC also contributed to <strong>the</strong> regional development of <strong>the</strong> industry, as well as,<br />

controversially, to <strong>the</strong> stronger position of US TNCs in <strong>the</strong> industry. All above is of<br />

particular interest to geographers with specialism in cultural industries, creative<br />

networks <strong>and</strong> clusters. The 'exit' of <strong>the</strong> UKFC represents one of <strong>the</strong> 'paradoxes of<br />

embeddedness' (Uzzi 1997) resulting in <strong>the</strong> increase of negotiation costs <strong>and</strong> failure of<br />

new entrants to develop <strong>the</strong> product. That can also lead to <strong>the</strong> destabilisation of<br />

arrangements between <strong>the</strong> tightly interrelated players in <strong>the</strong> London's media village.<br />

The paper draws on <strong>the</strong> interviews with film producers <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> UKFC officials, published<br />

data on <strong>the</strong> UKFC financial decisions <strong>and</strong> reflections on <strong>the</strong> industry issues in media.<br />

9


Study of Local Arts Agencies: A Case for Local Government Support of <strong>the</strong> Arts<br />

Cheryl Hughes, cherylhughes@earthlink.net<br />

My paper, takes a much-needed look at <strong>the</strong> arts <strong>and</strong> culture on <strong>the</strong> municipal level by<br />

examining local arts agencies (LAAs)—<strong>the</strong> non-profits <strong>and</strong> government agencies tasked<br />

with defining cities' cultural policies <strong>and</strong> representing <strong>the</strong> interests of local arts<br />

<strong>organization</strong>s <strong>and</strong> artists.<br />

Specifically, this paper is a benchmark study of <strong>the</strong> websites of <strong>the</strong> LAA's of 60 of <strong>the</strong><br />

largest cities in <strong>the</strong> United States. Included is an overview of <strong>the</strong> agencies that are a<br />

part of this study <strong>and</strong> an investigation of <strong>the</strong>ir governance, <strong>the</strong>ir funding, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

programs <strong>and</strong> services that <strong>the</strong>y offer. Central to this study is a comparison of <strong>the</strong> LAAs<br />

that are government agencies to <strong>the</strong> LAAs that are non-profit <strong>organization</strong>s <strong>and</strong> to<br />

determine which model serves larger cities better.<br />

The findings of this study clearly demonstrate that cities are best served by local arts<br />

agencies that are a part of <strong>the</strong> local government. The financial <strong>and</strong> programmatic<br />

disparities between a government LAA <strong>and</strong> a non-profit LAA are substantial. The results<br />

of this study also show that cities with government LAAs rank significantly higher on <strong>the</strong><br />

Florida index than cities with non-profit LAAs. On <strong>the</strong> strength of <strong>the</strong> data presented in<br />

this study, it can be concluded that communities with local arts agencies that are a part<br />

of local government are more likely to have a better-supported artistic community, <strong>and</strong><br />

thus have more arts <strong>and</strong> cultural opportunities than cities that do not have government<br />

agencies dedicated to advancing arts <strong>and</strong> culture.<br />

Designing creative clusters in China - a western model?<br />

Justin O'Connor, Queensl<strong>and</strong> University of Technology justin.oconnor@qut.edu.au<br />

Xin Gu, Queensl<strong>and</strong> University of Technology x1.gu@qut.edu.au<br />

This paper draws on some initial findings from a three year research Project under <strong>the</strong><br />

Australian Research Council linkage scheme: "Designing creative clusters in Australia<br />

<strong>and</strong> China". It is looking at <strong>the</strong> complex emergence of 'creative clusters' in China <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir connections (or lack <strong>the</strong>reof) with <strong>the</strong> wider urban creative economy. Focusing on<br />

<strong>the</strong> policy context, <strong>the</strong> motivations of cluster developers <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> involvement of cultural<br />

entrepreneurs in Shanghai, this research paper suggests that <strong>the</strong> modeling of <strong>the</strong><br />

creative economy in China through western <strong>the</strong>ory gives a distorted picture. This is<br />

compounded by extensive policy borrowing from <strong>the</strong> west - such as creative cluster -<br />

which never<strong>the</strong>less bears little resemblance beyond <strong>the</strong> superficial terminology. The<br />

paper focuses on <strong>the</strong> space available for cultural entrepreneurs within <strong>the</strong> Chinese<br />

urban creative economy <strong>and</strong> suggests that this has many similarities but also important<br />

differences from how this unfolded in <strong>the</strong> western urban context.<br />

10


Session 4: Place <strong>and</strong> Path Dependencies<br />

Cultural Planning in a Creative City: The Role of Context, Institutions, <strong>and</strong> Process<br />

Carl Grodach, University of Texas Arlington grodach@uta.edu<br />

A significant body of research has demonstrated that cultural-creative economy activity<br />

tends to be motivated less by <strong>the</strong> cost-based incentives that characterize much<br />

economic development than specific characteristics of place, qualities of <strong>the</strong> local labor<br />

force, education <strong>and</strong> networking opportunities, <strong>and</strong>/or amenities. However, political<br />

<strong>and</strong> institutional factors may steer <strong>the</strong> direction of policy in this sphere with little regard<br />

for industrial dynamics or workforce needs. Unfortunately, little research has examined<br />

how cities actually fashion <strong>the</strong>ir cultural or creative economy initiatives <strong>and</strong> how various<br />

actors in <strong>the</strong> private <strong>and</strong> nonprofit sector attempt to mediate this process <strong>and</strong><br />

transform policy outcomes <strong>and</strong> imaginaries. This is a significant omission because as<br />

local governments turn more attention to <strong>the</strong> cultural-creative economy, policy in this<br />

arena is increasingly likely to impact urban development <strong>and</strong> influence aspects of urban<br />

governance. To address this gap, this paper focuses on <strong>the</strong> ways that factors related to<br />

<strong>the</strong> institutional context intersect with outside influences to shape cultural planning <strong>and</strong><br />

policy in Austin, Texas. Not only does this research illustrate <strong>the</strong> complexity of creating<br />

informed policy, but also it highlights that <strong>the</strong> functional underpinnings of <strong>the</strong> cultural<br />

economy may depend as much on policy coalitions <strong>and</strong> context as on <strong>the</strong> general<br />

internal workings of <strong>the</strong> field across different places.<br />

The Role of Localized Institutions in 'Path Creation': <strong>the</strong> Case of <strong>the</strong> Cirque du Soleil<br />

Norma Rantisi, Concordia University norma.rantisi@gmail.com<br />

Deborah Leslie, University of Toronto deborah.leslie@utoronto.ca<br />

Within <strong>the</strong> literature on path dependency, it is acknowledged that a path is not<br />

necessarily fixed; that ruptures may occur along <strong>the</strong> way, in <strong>the</strong> form of exogenous<br />

shocks or internal disturbances. However, to date, much of <strong>the</strong> research focus has<br />

centered on how paths are reinforced. Less attention is paid to how a new course of<br />

development emerges, how a path is created. Martin <strong>and</strong> Sunley (2006) argue, for<br />

example, that a process of 'path creation' is often related to purposive action on <strong>the</strong><br />

part of agents to mobilize change. Path creation is enabled by existing policies <strong>and</strong><br />

institutions in a given place. As a result, <strong>the</strong>re is a need to conceptualize <strong>the</strong><br />

evolutionary process as place - as well as path - dependent. This paper explores <strong>the</strong> role<br />

or cultural policies in <strong>the</strong> evolution of <strong>the</strong> Cirque du Soleil in Montreal. In particular, we<br />

highlight <strong>the</strong> role of <strong>the</strong> government supported National Circus School in <strong>the</strong> emergence<br />

of <strong>the</strong> firm <strong>and</strong> in its ongoing creative development.<br />

11


The Emergence of a Neighborhood-Level Creative Economy <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Various<br />

Intermediaries that Shape it: Divergent Models, Uneasy Alliances, <strong>and</strong> Unexpected<br />

Tensions across Stakeholder Groups in a Pluralistic Political Arena<br />

Naomi Bartz, University of Chicago nbartz@uchicago.edu<br />

Much of <strong>the</strong> literature on <strong>the</strong> "creative economy" focuses on corporate interests <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir desired profit sector; <strong>the</strong> young urban professional. However, <strong>the</strong>re are o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>intermediaries</strong> that play a significant role in shaping <strong>and</strong> contesting consumer notions of<br />

arts <strong>and</strong> culture in <strong>the</strong> city. One site in which this pluralism is brought <strong>into</strong> sharp relief is<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Downtown Eastside (DTES) of Vancouver, British Columbia. Ethnographic field<br />

research illuminates three models for <strong>the</strong> neighborhood's emergent arts identity <strong>and</strong><br />

revitalization. The city, in t<strong>and</strong>em with local/international developers, is cultivating a<br />

corporate model; funding artist-designed doors in new condos to attract higher-income<br />

residents, <strong>and</strong> courting <strong>the</strong> arts department of Simon Fraser University to establish its<br />

home in <strong>the</strong> DTES. In contrast, artists with "do-it-yourself" philosophies have battled to<br />

maintain a toehold in <strong>the</strong> DTES; one of <strong>the</strong> few places left in Vancouver with venues that<br />

welcome local b<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> rents that allow <strong>the</strong> viability of small galleries. Finally<br />

community activists promote an outsider art/Native model; celebrating <strong>the</strong> homeless<br />

<strong>and</strong> low-income residents of <strong>the</strong> DTES. Each of <strong>the</strong>se stakeholder groups have a specific<br />

vision for <strong>the</strong> neighborhood <strong>and</strong> while power imbalances favor corporate <strong>and</strong> city<br />

interests, artists <strong>and</strong> residents have been able to leverage influence through protest <strong>and</strong><br />

subversion. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> city <strong>and</strong> developers, at times, recognize o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>intermediaries</strong> as<br />

lending an 'au<strong>the</strong>nticity' to <strong>the</strong> creative economy; capitalizing on <strong>the</strong> 'grit' of <strong>the</strong> DTES.<br />

Thus, <strong>the</strong> identity of <strong>the</strong> neighborhood is emerging in unexpected ways through<br />

alliances <strong>and</strong> tensions across stakeholder groups.<br />

Location of Recreation: A probability presence approach<br />

Özge Öner, Jönköping International Business School onerozge@gmail.com<br />

Presence of recreational services <strong>and</strong>, entertainment <strong>and</strong> art related facilities plays an<br />

important role for urban regions. Previous studies have shown that <strong>the</strong> urban economic<br />

vitality is highly dependent on <strong>the</strong> existence of cultural activities, city amenities,<br />

concentration of certain types of services <strong>and</strong> clustering power of people that are<br />

involved in creative occupational activities.<br />

Recreational services, entertainment, <strong>and</strong> art related facilities play a dual role. First,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y make up a part of <strong>the</strong> service industry, which has been growing over <strong>the</strong> last<br />

decades. They also play an amenity role, where <strong>the</strong>ir presence makes <strong>the</strong> region a more<br />

attractive place to be in. Moreover as most services, entertainment <strong>and</strong> art related<br />

facilities are highly location specific, since <strong>the</strong>y most often are consumed <strong>and</strong> produced<br />

in <strong>the</strong> same place. This implies that <strong>the</strong>y are dependent on a big enough market nearby<br />

to secure <strong>the</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> to keep <strong>the</strong> average fixed costs down. Therefore <strong>the</strong><br />

12


elationship between market size <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> presence of recreational services is important<br />

to underst<strong>and</strong> for <strong>the</strong> <strong>intermediaries</strong> that are involved in <strong>the</strong> development of such<br />

services by policy making, planning or investing; <strong>and</strong> especially for <strong>the</strong> countries where<br />

state-led policies are relatively dominant in shaping <strong>the</strong> market circumstances.<br />

This paper aims to examine <strong>the</strong> probability of finding a number of entertainment <strong>and</strong> art<br />

related services with respect to market size accessibility in Swedish municipalities. The<br />

empirical results will be discussed with respect to <strong>the</strong>ir use for different parties that are<br />

involved in decision making.<br />

Session 5: Inside/Outside <strong>the</strong> Creative Economy I<br />

Constructing creativity: Design, <strong>intermediaries</strong> <strong>and</strong> institutions in Canada <strong>and</strong><br />

Denmark<br />

Tara Vinodrai, University of Waterloo tara.vinodrai@uwaterloo.ca<br />

Over <strong>the</strong> past several decades, geographers have turned to underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> spatial<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>organization</strong>al dynamics of creative <strong>and</strong> cultural activities. The forms of knowledge<br />

<strong>and</strong> creativity that are most often privileged in this discussion are those that are<br />

embodied in professional classes of workers <strong>and</strong> embedded within particular social<br />

relations. Work on <strong>the</strong> 'creative class' is perhaps best known <strong>and</strong> has generated<br />

significant debate. While controversial, this work usefully draws attention to <strong>the</strong> critical<br />

importance of creative labour in <strong>the</strong> contemporary economy. Such creative workers are<br />

often represented through intermediary <strong>organization</strong>s, such as professional associations<br />

or guilds, which secure <strong>the</strong> position of <strong>the</strong>se creative communities in <strong>the</strong> local or<br />

regional economy. Such <strong>organization</strong>s may also play a key role in forming <strong>and</strong> shaping<br />

<strong>the</strong> social <strong>and</strong> professional networks of <strong>the</strong>se practice-based communities. Yet, our<br />

knowledge of how such <strong>intermediaries</strong> intervene in labour markets <strong>and</strong> construct <strong>the</strong><br />

underlying conditions for <strong>the</strong> creative economy remains somewhat limited. Drawing<br />

upon case study evidence from Canada <strong>and</strong> Denmark, <strong>the</strong> paper discusses <strong>the</strong> role<br />

played by professional associations in securing <strong>the</strong> position of one group of creative<br />

workers: designers. The analysis investigates <strong>the</strong> commonalties <strong>and</strong> differences in <strong>the</strong><br />

strategies <strong>and</strong> pathways taken by design-based professional associations in constructing<br />

<strong>the</strong> local <strong>and</strong> national creative economy <strong>and</strong> securing <strong>the</strong>ir position within it. The<br />

findings reveal that labour market <strong>intermediaries</strong> representing <strong>the</strong> interests of particular<br />

creativity-based professions can be powerful actors that actively shape <strong>the</strong> trajectory of<br />

regional <strong>and</strong> national economic development.<br />

The Alternative Art Worlds of <strong>the</strong> Indie <strong>and</strong> DiY Movements<br />

Benjamin Shultz, University of Tennessee bshultz@utk.edu<br />

13


The independent arts <strong>and</strong> crafts (indie crafts) movement is a recent phenomenon that<br />

attempts to reclaim traditional skills like knitting <strong>and</strong> sewing for a younger, hipper<br />

generation. Underpinning <strong>the</strong> movement is a politicized effort to reduce <strong>the</strong> social <strong>and</strong><br />

physical distance between <strong>the</strong> makers <strong>and</strong> consumers of artistic <strong>and</strong> cultural products.<br />

Adherents encourage people to "make things" on <strong>the</strong>ir own as an expression of<br />

creativity, as an alternative to purchasing mass-produced items, <strong>and</strong> as a way to engage<br />

personally with <strong>the</strong> artistic production process. While <strong>the</strong> prevailing research focus in<br />

geography emphasizes art- <strong>and</strong> culture-led development for <strong>the</strong> elites of global cities,<br />

<strong>the</strong> indie crafts movement provides an accessible, democratic creative outlet with<br />

relatively low barriers to entry. Through in-depth interviews with independent artists<br />

<strong>and</strong> crafters, I explore <strong>the</strong> ideological foundations of indie crafts from <strong>the</strong> perspective of<br />

social movement <strong>the</strong>ory. I <strong>the</strong>n examine how indie crafters use web-based technologies<br />

to communicate with <strong>and</strong> organize a spatially dispersed social movement. I conclude by<br />

positioning my findings within debates concerning <strong>the</strong> role of art <strong>and</strong> culture in <strong>the</strong><br />

economy <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> role of technology in geography.<br />

Reproducing Gender Divisions: The Role of Headhunters in <strong>the</strong> Creative Economy<br />

Karenjit Clare, University of Oxford karenjit.clare@gtc.ox.ac.uk<br />

Recently, <strong>the</strong> growing importance of a number of labour market <strong>intermediaries</strong> has<br />

grabbed <strong>the</strong> attention of a range of scholars, resulting in <strong>the</strong> opening up of a range of<br />

new debates. This talk, which draws on a case study of employment practices in <strong>the</strong><br />

advertising sector in London, contributes to an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of recruitment <strong>and</strong><br />

promotion practices of workers. It argues that <strong>the</strong> rise of headhunters, should be seen<br />

as integral factors in underst<strong>and</strong>ing career trajectories of workers in <strong>the</strong> creative<br />

industries. These <strong>intermediaries</strong> are viewed as important for assisting in <strong>the</strong> processes<br />

of job recruitment, advancement <strong>and</strong> various o<strong>the</strong>r aspects of career development.<br />

Drawing on data from interviews, I reveal how headhunters, as labour market<br />

<strong>intermediaries</strong> affect <strong>the</strong> professional lives of many employees, <strong>and</strong> I document how<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir work has a profound, though hidden, effect on <strong>the</strong> employment picture. It is<br />

argued that scholars need to pay attention to <strong>the</strong> role of headhunters if <strong>the</strong>y are to<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> informal mechanisms in <strong>the</strong> maintenance of gender inequality in <strong>the</strong><br />

creative economy.<br />

The evolution of <strong>intermediaries</strong> in Canada's book trade<br />

Jeff Boggs, Brock University jeff.boggs@brocku.ca<br />

As an ideal type, <strong>the</strong> contemporary Canadian book trade can be conceived of as a series<br />

of tasks — a technical division of labor — that begins as a completed yet unpublished<br />

manuscript <strong>and</strong> ends as a book in a retail environment. These tasks are often bundled<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r — a social division of labor — that emerges in part from tradition, in part from<br />

legal requirements <strong>and</strong> in part to capture economies of scale or scope. Examples here<br />

14


include publishing houses, packagers, distributors, or book stores. This social <strong>and</strong><br />

technical division of labor, however, is not static, but dynamic. It is dynamic in response<br />

to a range of tensions <strong>and</strong> opportunities that impinge on <strong>the</strong>se bundles of tasks.<br />

Analytically, <strong>intermediaries</strong> emerge to moderate <strong>the</strong>se tensions or exploit <strong>the</strong>se<br />

opportunities, <strong>and</strong> empirically play a crucial role in <strong>the</strong> evolution of Canada's book<br />

trade.<br />

This paper focuses on three <strong>intermediaries</strong>: <strong>the</strong> now defunct Book Expo Canada; literary<br />

agents; <strong>and</strong> BookNet Canada. Until its closure in 2009, Book Expo Canada fostered<br />

communication between publishers, suppliers <strong>and</strong> book stores by temporarily reducing<br />

<strong>the</strong> cost of face-to-face contact. Literary agents, by virtue of <strong>the</strong>ir position between<br />

networks of authors <strong>and</strong> publishers, manage information gaps in order to collect rents.<br />

BookNet Canada — unlike <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two <strong>intermediaries</strong> — is a not-for-profit, tasked<br />

with technological <strong>and</strong> <strong>organization</strong>al upgrading throughout <strong>the</strong> book supply chain.<br />

Collectively, <strong>the</strong>se examples provide a glimpse <strong>into</strong> <strong>the</strong> regulation of market failures<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> provision of collective goods within one cultural industry.<br />

Session 6: Inside/Outside <strong>the</strong> Creative Economy II<br />

Arts practices in Flux: new artist collectives for a creative economy<br />

Doreen Jakob, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill djakob@email.unc.edu<br />

During <strong>the</strong> past 20 years, <strong>the</strong> art world has experienced a revival <strong>and</strong> resurgence of<br />

artist collectives as <strong>intermediaries</strong> between individual artistic production <strong>and</strong><br />

institutionalized consumption. However, <strong>the</strong>se groups differ significantly from <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

predecessors. Underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> 'collective' as a form within a socialist social system,<br />

many former artist collectives saw <strong>the</strong>mselves as products of <strong>and</strong>/or influenced by social<br />

movements. Collectivity was a condition of both cultural <strong>and</strong> political work. While some<br />

of <strong>the</strong>se traditions persist, new forms of art collectives have emerged that fuse <strong>and</strong><br />

combine <strong>the</strong> idealistic notion of sharing with enterprise culture. The widely celebrated<br />

new artist collectives are, as some critics put it, "hot," "fast, cheap, <strong>and</strong> exuberant,"<br />

"insouciant" <strong>and</strong> offer "colorful, guilt-free fun" <strong>and</strong> "cultural distraction without <strong>the</strong><br />

heavy intellectual price tag." Yet <strong>the</strong>ir transformation reflects in many ways more<br />

general social, economic <strong>and</strong> political changes of western society. Like o<strong>the</strong>r former<br />

'alternative' <strong>and</strong> non-commercialized activities, artist collectives have been included in<br />

<strong>and</strong> thus transformed by mainstream culture <strong>and</strong> commerce by separating <strong>the</strong>ir image<br />

from <strong>the</strong>ir history of political activism. To illustrate, this paper highlights <strong>the</strong><br />

development of Flux Factory, a New York City artist collective. Founded on <strong>the</strong> principles<br />

of collectivity <strong>and</strong> bohemia, its introduction to <strong>the</strong> institutionalized art world <strong>and</strong><br />

subsequent establishment <strong>and</strong> success within it, increasingly undermines <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>organization</strong>'s ability to sustain its original character. No longer directly concerned with<br />

political work, <strong>the</strong> new, "hot" artist collectives are symbols of <strong>and</strong> reactions to a creative<br />

economy that embodies <strong>the</strong> power of <strong>the</strong> market.<br />

15


The role of art fairs in <strong>the</strong> contemporary art galleries' acquisition <strong>and</strong> management of<br />

legitimacy<br />

Ca<strong>the</strong>rine Morel, Kingston University c.morel@kingston.ac.uk<br />

Contemporary art fairs are creative industry events which, not only provide a venue for<br />

<strong>the</strong> (re)enactment of institutional arrangements in <strong>the</strong> art world but also for <strong>the</strong><br />

negotiation <strong>and</strong> affirmation of different values that underpin <strong>the</strong>m (Moeran <strong>and</strong><br />

Pedersen (2009. Through <strong>the</strong>ir intensive business negotiations <strong>and</strong> social interactions<br />

with o<strong>the</strong>r fair attendees, art world actors reveal <strong>and</strong> simultaneously (re)configure <strong>the</strong><br />

field to which <strong>the</strong>y belong.<br />

Beyond <strong>the</strong>ir economic role, art fairs are largely about symbolic hierarchies <strong>and</strong> cultural<br />

capital prized by <strong>the</strong> institutions <strong>and</strong> individuals attending <strong>the</strong>m. For a gallery owner,<br />

being accepted at a top art fair is not only <strong>the</strong> promise of a sold out show but also an<br />

'official' accolade given by one of <strong>the</strong>se 'informal academies' of <strong>the</strong> art world described<br />

by Moulin (2003:48).<br />

Based on intensive fieldwork at various top European art fairs (<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir satellite fairs)<br />

<strong>and</strong> interviews with gallery owners <strong>and</strong> fair organizers, this paper will provide an<br />

account of <strong>the</strong> art fair practices with a view to determine how art fairs contribute to<br />

contemporary art galleries' acquisition <strong>and</strong> management of legitimacy. This paper will<br />

fill a gap in <strong>the</strong> knowledge about art fairs which, despite <strong>the</strong>ir rapid increase in number-<br />

<strong>the</strong> so-called artfairisation of <strong>the</strong> art world (Barragan 2008: 18)- remain largely underresearched.<br />

After reviewing <strong>the</strong> literature on tradeshows <strong>and</strong> fairs in <strong>the</strong> creative industries (Skov,<br />

2006, Morean, 2010), <strong>the</strong> concept of legitimacy (Suchman, 1995) will be discussed in<br />

relation with institutional <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> art world.<br />

Logistics <strong>and</strong> Informal Circuits of Labour in China<br />

Ned Rossiter, University of Nottingham Ningbo ned@nedrossiter.org<br />

This paper identifies two key <strong>and</strong> often ignored <strong>intermediaries</strong> in creative economies<br />

<strong>and</strong> culture industries: logistics <strong>and</strong> informal labour. The paper considers <strong>the</strong> role of <strong>the</strong><br />

informal economy of provincial migrant workers <strong>and</strong> small businesses in China as an<br />

invisible or partitioned intermediary in <strong>the</strong> creation of 'innovation' for <strong>the</strong> so-called<br />

creative economies. Whe<strong>the</strong>r it is <strong>the</strong> pirate culture of shenzhai or self-<strong>organization</strong><br />

labour in <strong>the</strong> electronic waste industries, <strong>the</strong> informal economy underscores <strong>the</strong><br />

possibility of creative economies. This paper proposes that <strong>the</strong> formal economy of <strong>the</strong><br />

creative industries is anything but inventive. More notable is <strong>the</strong> parasitical manner in<br />

which <strong>the</strong> formal economy expropriates innovation as it is developed across informal<br />

circuits of labour. Arguably such a relation has always been central to <strong>the</strong> dynamics of<br />

16


colonial <strong>and</strong> imperial capitalism. But to cast aside such dynamics is to relegate new<br />

conjunctures of <strong>the</strong> political to <strong>the</strong> dustbin of history.<br />

In order to account for <strong>the</strong>se dynamics, <strong>the</strong> paper situates <strong>the</strong> global logistics industry as<br />

a dominant architecture of governance that modulates relations between informal <strong>and</strong><br />

formal economies in China <strong>and</strong> across <strong>the</strong> world. Concerned with <strong>the</strong> algorithmic<br />

management of <strong>the</strong> movement of people <strong>and</strong> things in <strong>the</strong> interests of communication,<br />

transport <strong>and</strong> economic efficiencies, logistics operates as a key technology of control in<br />

<strong>the</strong> production of subjectivity. Through a study of social mobilities within <strong>and</strong> under <strong>the</strong><br />

creative economies, <strong>the</strong> paper investigates how constituent practices associated with<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>organization</strong> of labour <strong>and</strong> life foreground new contours of <strong>the</strong> political.<br />

Public Restrooms as Taboo Scenarios<br />

Harvey Molotch, New York University harvey.molotch@nyu.edu<br />

Toilets, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir aggregation as public restrooms, repel discourse -- that includes<br />

serious analytic attention from social science. This helps public facilities persist as zones<br />

of inequality, indignity, <strong>and</strong> as mechanisms of exclusion from participation in urban life. I<br />

discuss implications of <strong>the</strong>se dynamics in regard to class, gender, dirt <strong>and</strong> sensuality<br />

(among o<strong>the</strong>r phenomena). I describe mechanisms of spatial, technological, <strong>and</strong> cultural<br />

reform.<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!