11.10.2013 Views

production of selected secondary metabolites in transformed ...

production of selected secondary metabolites in transformed ...

production of selected secondary metabolites in transformed ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

22,1×10 -3 J 1/2 m -3/2 . However, if we calculate the value δ2 from the structure, we obta<strong>in</strong><br />

approximately similar values <strong>of</strong> δ2 <strong>in</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> 20,9 to 23,9×10 -3 J 1/2 m -3/2 . The biggest<br />

differences are <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Diexter G214 and U14EG56 where the biggest differences between<br />

their structures are also.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to these results, it should be possible to dissolve these samples <strong>in</strong> solvents with<br />

total solubility parameter value <strong>of</strong> δ1 about 20 to 24 units.- And <strong>in</strong> most cases, experimental<br />

results comply with theory and samples could be dissolved <strong>in</strong> solvents with value <strong>of</strong> δ1≈δ2 ± 2.<br />

Solubility <strong>of</strong> PUR sample U14EG56 <strong>in</strong> various type <strong>of</strong> solvent:<br />

solubility U14EG56<br />

solubility U14EG56<br />

Solvent: p. δ1 δ2 ≈ 22,1 Solvent:<br />

p. δ1 δ2 ≈ 22,1<br />

Toluene 18,2 * N,N dimethylacetamide 22,7 +<br />

Ethylmethylketone 19 + N methylpyrrolidone 22,9 +<br />

Dichloromethane 19,8 + Isopropanol 23,6 -<br />

Acetone 20 * N,N dimethylformamide 24,7 +<br />

1,4-Dioxane 20,5 + Ethanol 26 -<br />

Acetyl acetone 22,1 + Butyrolactone 27 -<br />

Ethylene glycol 30 -<br />

In the case, when sample is not soluble <strong>in</strong> right one solvent accord<strong>in</strong>g to the theory, it can<br />

be <strong>in</strong>terpreted by different chemical nature <strong>of</strong> used solvents and it relates to different value <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual components <strong>of</strong> their total solubility parameter.<br />

The result <strong>of</strong> study <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> different values <strong>of</strong> rigid segment fraction and crossl<strong>in</strong>ked<br />

fraction content <strong>of</strong> sample U14BD2000 to its solubility parameter, accord<strong>in</strong>g its<br />

parameter <strong>of</strong> swell<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the study <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> rigid segment content and cross-l<strong>in</strong>ked fraction<br />

content to the solubility parameter, it was observed that the more rigit segment fraction and/or<br />

cross-l<strong>in</strong>ked fraction is present, the more resistent the sample was. All these changes should<br />

be connected with a changes <strong>of</strong> sample solubility parametr and should be observable<br />

experimentally.<br />

Study <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> different percentage distribution <strong>of</strong> rigid segment fraction <strong>in</strong><br />

case <strong>of</strong> sample U14BD2000:<br />

Parameter <strong>of</strong> swell<strong>in</strong>g Q<br />

(Type A with the less quantity, type D with the most quantity <strong>of</strong> rigid segment content)<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> different quantity <strong>of</strong> rigid segment to the<br />

solubility parametr <strong>of</strong> U14BD2000 (accord<strong>in</strong>g its<br />

parameter <strong>of</strong> swell<strong>in</strong>g)<br />

type A<br />

type B<br />

type C<br />

type D<br />

0<br />

19,0 20,0 21,0 22,0 23,0 24,0 25,0<br />

Solubility parameter <strong>of</strong> solvent δ1 (10-3J1/2m -3/2 )<br />

Type <strong>of</strong><br />

sample:<br />

δ2 - from<br />

measur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

δ2 - from the<br />

structure<br />

A 19,8 20,11<br />

B 20,5 20,72<br />

C 22,9 21,34<br />

D 22,9 21,96<br />

Sborník soutěže Studentské tvůrčí č<strong>in</strong>nosti Student 2006 a doktorské soutěže O cenu děkana 2005 a 2006<br />

Sekce DSP 2006, strana 252

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!