11.10.2013 Views

production of selected secondary metabolites in transformed ...

production of selected secondary metabolites in transformed ...

production of selected secondary metabolites in transformed ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

F i<br />

90<br />

70<br />

50<br />

30<br />

10<br />

-10<br />

-30<br />

Zephyram<strong>in</strong><br />

Septonex Ajat<strong>in</strong><br />

DDAB<br />

Triton<br />

SDS<br />

-50<br />

0 0,002 0,004 0,006 0,008 0,01 0,012 0,014 0,016<br />

Fig.4.: Surfactants <strong>in</strong>fluence on Ga-HQS complex at pH 3. Septonex, Zephyram<strong>in</strong>e, Ajat<strong>in</strong>,<br />

SDS – mol.dm -3 , CTAC (Hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium chloride)– c/4 (mol.dm -3 ),<br />

DDAB (Didodecyldimethyl ammonium bromide) – c/5 (mol.dm -3 ), Triton X-100 –<br />

c/4.10 -5 (ppm), Brij – c/15 (mol.dm -3 ).<br />

Critical micellar concentrations are highlighted by the fulfilled marks.<br />

The nature <strong>of</strong> the complex strongly depends on the pH. The molar ratio <strong>of</strong> Me to QSA <strong>in</strong><br />

the b<strong>in</strong>ary complex determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the cont<strong>in</strong>uum variations method is 1:1 <strong>in</strong> acidic range and<br />

1:3 <strong>in</strong> alkalic range (Fig.5). In the presence <strong>of</strong> cationic surfactant Zephyram<strong>in</strong>e, the molar<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> ternary complex was found to be always 1:3 (Fig.5).<br />

F i<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1<br />

x L<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

c<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

CTAC<br />

Brij<br />

a 100<br />

b<br />

F i<br />

0<br />

0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1<br />

Fig.5.: (a) Cont<strong>in</strong>uum variations <strong>of</strong> Al-HQS complex at pH 4. 1-c0= 1,1.10 -4 M, 2- c0= 5,6.10 -5 M,<br />

3-5,6.10 -5 M, 0,0012M Zephyram<strong>in</strong>e<br />

(b) Cont<strong>in</strong>uum variations <strong>of</strong> In-HQS complex. 1-c0= 3,5.10 -5 M, pH8, 2- c0= 1,8.10 -5 M,<br />

pH8, 3-1,8.10 -5 M, 0,0012M Zephyram<strong>in</strong>e, pH8, 4- c0= 1,8.10 -5 M, pH4<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, the improved method with enhanced sensitivity by the presence <strong>of</strong> cationic<br />

surfactant Zephyram<strong>in</strong>e was optimized with concentration <strong>of</strong> Zephyram<strong>in</strong>e 0,0012M and five<br />

times excess <strong>of</strong> QSA to highest molar concentration <strong>of</strong> Me. Optimal pH is 4 for Al, 3 for Ga<br />

and 8 for In.<br />

Sborník soutěže Studentské tvůrčí č<strong>in</strong>nosti Student 2006 a doktorské soutěže O cenu děkana 2005 a 2006<br />

Sekce DSP 2006, strana 246<br />

x L<br />

1<br />

4<br />

2<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!