2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures
2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures
2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Environmental Chemistry & Technology<br />
In real water systems, several other ions are present,<br />
which can compete with metals measured by DGT. The Ca<br />
and Mg are dominant cations in hard waters. Although the<br />
stability constant for magnesium is lower than for Cd, Cu,<br />
ni and Pb, magnesium can affect DGT measured metals concentrations.<br />
Uptake of Cd, Cu, ni and Pb was not influenced<br />
by magnesium nitrate in the whole concentration range up tu<br />
0.05 mol dm –3 . new discs can be also used in high salinity<br />
waters.<br />
Fig. 3. Ifluence of HA concentration c hA on the normalized values<br />
of the apparent diffusion coefficients (D APP /D TAb ) for Spheron-Oxin<br />
® resin gel (pH ~ 7). ▲Cd, ●Cu, □Ni, ■Pb<br />
In natural waters, variety of ligands occurs that can affect<br />
concentration measured by DGT technique. Iminodiacetic<br />
acid (IDA) was used as a model strong ligand influencing<br />
the uptake of metals. The results of deployment of DGT<br />
units, packed with Spheron-Oxin ® and Chelex 100 resin gels,<br />
in ni solutions containing IDA in the concentration range of<br />
0–0.1 mol dm –3 are shown in Fig. <strong>2.</strong><br />
Diffusion coefficients (D) can be calculated when taking<br />
into account diffusion area (3.14 cm 2 ) and thickness of the<br />
diffusive layer. Those diffusion coefficients can be considered<br />
as apparent diffusion coefficients (D APP ) of the metal under<br />
specific conditions. Their values represent the metal fluxes<br />
per unit deployment time, unit diffusion area, unit metal concentration<br />
in the external solution and unit thickness of the<br />
diffusive gel layer. The difference between both curves relates<br />
to stability constants of both funcional groups. This difference<br />
can be employed in speciation measurements.<br />
Humic acids (HA) are the most widespread natural complexing<br />
ligands. Influence of the concentration of the humic<br />
substance on the D APP is shown in Fig. 3., in which elementspecific<br />
effect of HA can be observed. Similar results were<br />
also obtained in Refs. 3,4 , in which Chelex 100 and Spheron-<br />
Thiol ® resin gels were used. Due to competitive reactions,<br />
s374<br />
Fig. 4. Influence of carbonate concentration on distribution coefficient<br />
of uranium for ■ Spheron-Oxin ® , ▲ Spheron-Salicyl ® ,<br />
and ● Chelex 100 sorbents (pH ~ 6.7)<br />
the complex formation with HA decreases the concentration<br />
of metal species in external solution that can be measured by<br />
DGT.<br />
Uranium, analogously to other heavy metals, forms various<br />
complexes in natural waters with a variety of ligands.<br />
Depending on pH of the solution, uranyl ions are bound in<br />
stable hydroxocomplexes and, especially carbonate complexes<br />
due to dissolved atmospheric CO 2 . Influence of equilibrium<br />
carbonate concentration on distribution coefficient (D g)<br />
of uranium is shown in Fig. 4. It is evident that the resin gel<br />
based on Spheron-Oxin ® appears to be a new useful resin gel<br />
for speciation analysis of uranium in natural waters.<br />
Conclusions<br />
The new resin gel based on Spheron-Oxin® with anchored<br />
5-sulphophenyl-azo-8-hydroxychinoline functional<br />
groups exhibits very strong afinity to Cd, Cu, ni, Pb and U.<br />
In addition to conventional Chelex 100 based gels it can be<br />
applied in DGT technique and provide more information on<br />
heavy metals speciation, especially of uranium in aquatic<br />
systems.<br />
Acknowledgement: This work was performed and supported<br />
within the Institutional research plan AV0Z40310501.<br />
REFEREnCES<br />
1. Dawison W., Zhang H.: nature 367, 546 (1994).<br />
<strong>2.</strong> Slovák Z.: Bulletin of n.p.Lachema Brno, 1979, 30 p.<br />
3. Dočekal B., řezáčová-Smetková V., Dočekalová H.:<br />
Chem. Pap. 59, 298 (2005).<br />
4. Trávníčková J.: Diploma Thesis. Brno University of<br />
Technology, Brno, Czech Republic, 2008.