2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures
2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures
2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Environmental Chemistry & Technology<br />
of sedimented phase that decreases the enrichment factor and<br />
another is salting-out effect that increases the enrichment<br />
factor. Therefore, the enrichment factor is nearly constant by<br />
increasing the amount of sodium nitrate. Therefore the experiments<br />
were performed in absence of the salt.<br />
E f f e c t o f C o e x i s t i n g I o n s<br />
The effects of common coexisting ions in natural water<br />
samples on the recovery of silver were studied. In these experiments,<br />
10.0 ml of solutions contains 20 ng ml −1 of silver and<br />
various amounts of interfering ions were treated according to<br />
the recommended procedure. A given spices was considered<br />
to interfere if it resulted in a ± 5 % variation of the AAS signal.<br />
The results obtained are given in Table II.<br />
F i g u r e s o f M e r i t<br />
Table. III summarizes the analytical characteristics of<br />
the optimized method, including linear range, limit of detection,<br />
reproducibility, and enhancement factor. The calibration<br />
graph was linear in the range of 6–120 ng ml −1 of<br />
silver. The limit of detection, defined as C L = 3 S B /m (where<br />
C L , S B and m are the limit of detection, standard deviation of<br />
the blank and slope of the calibration graph, respectively),<br />
was 1.2 ng ml −1 . The relative standard deviation (R.S.D.)<br />
for ten replicate measurements of 20 ng dm −3 Ag was 3.6 %.<br />
The enhancement factor was obtained from the slope ratio<br />
of calibration graph after and before extraction, which was<br />
about 66.<br />
Table III<br />
Analytical characteristics of DLLME-ETAAS for determination<br />
of Ag<br />
Element condition DLLME–ETAAS ETAAS<br />
Linear range [ng ml −1 ] 6–120 500–20,000<br />
Correlation coefficient (r) 0.995 0.997<br />
Slope <strong>2.</strong>65 0.04<br />
Enhancement factor a 66 –<br />
RSD [%], (n = 8) b 3.6 3.5<br />
LOD [ng ml −1 ] c 1.2 80<br />
a Calculated as the ratio of slope of pre-concentrated samples<br />
to that obtained without pre-concentration.<br />
b At a silver concentration of 20 ng ml −1 .<br />
c Determined as three times of the standard deviation of the<br />
blank signal, and slop of calibration curve after pre-concentration<br />
A n a l y s i s o f n a t u r a l W a t e r s<br />
The proposed DLLME–ETAAS methodology was<br />
applied to the determination of silver in several water samples.<br />
Tap, underground and river water were collected from<br />
the Tehran and were analyzed by DLLME combined with<br />
ETAAS for determination of silver. The concentration of<br />
silver in the tap, underground and river water samples were<br />
determined to be 17.2 ± 0.6 ng ml −1 , 24.7 ± 0.6 ng ml −1 and<br />
30.10 ± 0.4 ng ml −1 respectively (Table IV). The water sam-<br />
s334<br />
ples were spiked with silver standards to assess matrix effects.<br />
The relative recoveries of silver from these waters at<br />
spiking level of 10 and 20 ng ml −1 were 102, 98, and 100 %,<br />
respectively (Table IV). These results demonstrated that the<br />
tap, underground and river water samples matrices, in our<br />
present context, had little effect on DLLME of silver.<br />
Table IV<br />
Determination of Ag in real samples<br />
Sample<br />
Added Found<br />
[ng ml −1 ] [ng ml −1 ] a<br />
Recovery [%]<br />
– 17.2 ± 0.6 –<br />
Tap waterb 10 27.3 ± 0.4 101<br />
20 37.5 ± 0.6 103<br />
Underground<br />
water<br />
– 24.7 ± 0.5 –<br />
c 10 34.6 ± 0. 6 99<br />
River water d<br />
20 44.4 ± 0.5 97<br />
– 30.1 ± 0.4 –<br />
10 40.0 ± 0.5 99<br />
20 50.2 ± 0.8 101<br />
a Mean of three experiments ± standard deviation.<br />
b From drinking water system of Tehran, Iran.<br />
c Obtained from Vardavard, Iran.<br />
d From Karaj river, Iran.<br />
Conclusions<br />
In this paper we introduced a DLLME–ETAAS method<br />
for the analysis of ultra trace amounts of Ag in real samples<br />
such as tap water, river water and underground water. The<br />
important features of DLLME method are low cost, use of<br />
minimized toxic organic solvents, simplicity of operation,<br />
rapidity, high enrichment factor and high sensitivity and selectivity.<br />
High preconcentration factor was obtained easily through<br />
this method and a detection limit at ng ml −1 level was<br />
achieved with only 10.00 ml of sample. In this method sample<br />
preparation time as well as consumption of toxic organic<br />
solvents was minimized without affecting the sensitivity of<br />
the method..This method is characterized with simplicity,<br />
rapidity, reliability, safety and low cost, and is suitable for<br />
the determination of ultra-trace silver in environmental water<br />
samples.<br />
REFEREnCES<br />
1. Grayson M. : Kirk–Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical<br />
Technology ,.(3 rd ed.), vol. 21, Wiley, new York 1980.<br />
<strong>2.</strong> Smith I.C., Carson B. L.:, Trace Metals in the Environment<br />
, vol. 2, Ann Arbor Science Publisher‘s Inc., Ann<br />
Arbor 1977.<br />
3. Šràmkovà J., Kotrlý S., Jakoubková P.: Anal. Chim.<br />
Acta 408, 183 (2000).<br />
4. Baron M. G., Herrin R. T., Armstrong D. E.: Analyst 25,<br />
123 (2000).<br />
5. Singh R. P., Pambid E. R.: Analyst 115, 301 (1990).<br />
6. ndung’u K., Ranville M. A., Franks R. P., Flegal A. R.:<br />
Mar. Chem. 98, 109 (2006).