11.10.2013 Views

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Environmental Chemistry & Technology<br />

of sedimented phase that decreases the enrichment factor and<br />

another is salting-out effect that increases the enrichment<br />

factor. Therefore, the enrichment factor is nearly constant by<br />

increasing the amount of sodium nitrate. Therefore the experiments<br />

were performed in absence of the salt.<br />

E f f e c t o f C o e x i s t i n g I o n s<br />

The effects of common coexisting ions in natural water<br />

samples on the recovery of silver were studied. In these experiments,<br />

10.0 ml of solutions contains 20 ng ml −1 of silver and<br />

various amounts of interfering ions were treated according to<br />

the recommended procedure. A given spices was considered<br />

to interfere if it resulted in a ± 5 % variation of the AAS signal.<br />

The results obtained are given in Table II.<br />

F i g u r e s o f M e r i t<br />

Table. III summarizes the analytical characteristics of<br />

the optimized method, including linear range, limit of detection,<br />

reproducibility, and enhancement factor. The calibration<br />

graph was linear in the range of 6–120 ng ml −1 of<br />

silver. The limit of detection, defined as C L = 3 S B /m (where<br />

C L , S B and m are the limit of detection, standard deviation of<br />

the blank and slope of the calibration graph, respectively),<br />

was 1.2 ng ml −1 . The relative standard deviation (R.S.D.)<br />

for ten replicate measurements of 20 ng dm −3 Ag was 3.6 %.<br />

The enhancement factor was obtained from the slope ratio<br />

of calibration graph after and before extraction, which was<br />

about 66.<br />

Table III<br />

Analytical characteristics of DLLME-ETAAS for determination<br />

of Ag<br />

Element condition DLLME–ETAAS ETAAS<br />

Linear range [ng ml −1 ] 6–120 500–20,000<br />

Correlation coefficient (r) 0.995 0.997<br />

Slope <strong>2.</strong>65 0.04<br />

Enhancement factor a 66 –<br />

RSD [%], (n = 8) b 3.6 3.5<br />

LOD [ng ml −1 ] c 1.2 80<br />

a Calculated as the ratio of slope of pre-concentrated samples<br />

to that obtained without pre-concentration.<br />

b At a silver concentration of 20 ng ml −1 .<br />

c Determined as three times of the standard deviation of the<br />

blank signal, and slop of calibration curve after pre-concentration<br />

A n a l y s i s o f n a t u r a l W a t e r s<br />

The proposed DLLME–ETAAS methodology was<br />

applied to the determination of silver in several water samples.<br />

Tap, underground and river water were collected from<br />

the Tehran and were analyzed by DLLME combined with<br />

ETAAS for determination of silver. The concentration of<br />

silver in the tap, underground and river water samples were<br />

determined to be 17.2 ± 0.6 ng ml −1 , 24.7 ± 0.6 ng ml −1 and<br />

30.10 ± 0.4 ng ml −1 respectively (Table IV). The water sam-<br />

s334<br />

ples were spiked with silver standards to assess matrix effects.<br />

The relative recoveries of silver from these waters at<br />

spiking level of 10 and 20 ng ml −1 were 102, 98, and 100 %,<br />

respectively (Table IV). These results demonstrated that the<br />

tap, underground and river water samples matrices, in our<br />

present context, had little effect on DLLME of silver.<br />

Table IV<br />

Determination of Ag in real samples<br />

Sample<br />

Added Found<br />

[ng ml −1 ] [ng ml −1 ] a<br />

Recovery [%]<br />

– 17.2 ± 0.6 –<br />

Tap waterb 10 27.3 ± 0.4 101<br />

20 37.5 ± 0.6 103<br />

Underground<br />

water<br />

– 24.7 ± 0.5 –<br />

c 10 34.6 ± 0. 6 99<br />

River water d<br />

20 44.4 ± 0.5 97<br />

– 30.1 ± 0.4 –<br />

10 40.0 ± 0.5 99<br />

20 50.2 ± 0.8 101<br />

a Mean of three experiments ± standard deviation.<br />

b From drinking water system of Tehran, Iran.<br />

c Obtained from Vardavard, Iran.<br />

d From Karaj river, Iran.<br />

Conclusions<br />

In this paper we introduced a DLLME–ETAAS method<br />

for the analysis of ultra trace amounts of Ag in real samples<br />

such as tap water, river water and underground water. The<br />

important features of DLLME method are low cost, use of<br />

minimized toxic organic solvents, simplicity of operation,<br />

rapidity, high enrichment factor and high sensitivity and selectivity.<br />

High preconcentration factor was obtained easily through<br />

this method and a detection limit at ng ml −1 level was<br />

achieved with only 10.00 ml of sample. In this method sample<br />

preparation time as well as consumption of toxic organic<br />

solvents was minimized without affecting the sensitivity of<br />

the method..This method is characterized with simplicity,<br />

rapidity, reliability, safety and low cost, and is suitable for<br />

the determination of ultra-trace silver in environmental water<br />

samples.<br />

REFEREnCES<br />

1. Grayson M. : Kirk–Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical<br />

Technology ,.(3 rd ed.), vol. 21, Wiley, new York 1980.<br />

<strong>2.</strong> Smith I.C., Carson B. L.:, Trace Metals in the Environment<br />

, vol. 2, Ann Arbor Science Publisher‘s Inc., Ann<br />

Arbor 1977.<br />

3. Šràmkovà J., Kotrlý S., Jakoubková P.: Anal. Chim.<br />

Acta 408, 183 (2000).<br />

4. Baron M. G., Herrin R. T., Armstrong D. E.: Analyst 25,<br />

123 (2000).<br />

5. Singh R. P., Pambid E. R.: Analyst 115, 301 (1990).<br />

6. ndung’u K., Ranville M. A., Franks R. P., Flegal A. R.:<br />

Mar. Chem. 98, 109 (2006).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!