11.10.2013 Views

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Environmental Chemistry & Technology<br />

tion of negatively charged aluminium complexes in seawater<br />

(e.g. fluoro complexes) and the high ionic strength of the eluent.<br />

The effect of ionic strength has been reported to affect<br />

the retention of ions in chelation IC 8,16 . In an environment<br />

of sufficiently high ionic strength the repulsion between<br />

negatively charged aluminium species and the iminodiacetic<br />

acid functional groups may be reduced. This can result<br />

in a subsequent increase in retention time as observed in our<br />

studies. This response is actually considered favourable as it<br />

allows for additional stabilisation of the baseline between the<br />

minor dip in fluorescence and elution of the aluminium.<br />

Fig. <strong>2.</strong> Effect of increasing sample volume on column performance<br />

and fluorescence response<br />

S e a w a t e r S a m p l e s<br />

At this stage, the optimised HPCIC system coupled with<br />

fluorescence detection had been shown to be applicable to the<br />

determination of aluminium in acidified standards prepared<br />

in Milli-Q water. Previous work by us has shown that IDAS<br />

can be successfully applied to the analysis of samples with a<br />

complex matrix but it had not yet been used for the detection<br />

of aluminium in seawater. Seawater is difficult to analyse not<br />

only in terms of the high salt content, but also due to the<br />

number of other potentially interfering ions, such as iron and<br />

magnesium. However, preliminary chromatograms showed<br />

no co-elution problems and there was only one additional<br />

peak (at ~ 8 min) other than aluminium. Based on previous<br />

findings this peak is likely to be due to iron and/or a mixture<br />

other analytes e.g. sodium and calcium.<br />

Calibration of the system using a 500 µl sample loop<br />

was carried out by means of standard addition to an Antarctic<br />

seawater sample containing low levels of aluminium. The<br />

limit of detection was determined from the standard deviation<br />

of clean seawater and determining the signal equivalent to<br />

three times this value (i.e. 3σ). A LOD of 0.39 nM was achieved<br />

using a 500 µl sample loop. Good linearity of the system<br />

was observed between 1.8 and 36 nM.<br />

Chromatograms of Antarctic seawater for different injection<br />

volumes are given in Fig. 3.<br />

s322<br />

Fig. 3. Chromatogram of Antarctic seawater for different injection<br />

volumes<br />

Conclusions<br />

The optimised HPCIC system with fluorescence detection<br />

of the aluminium-lumogallion complex shows<br />

promise for the quantification of aluminium in Antarctic<br />

seawater. The IDAS chromatographic column does not suffer<br />

from issues such as co-elution of species with aluminium and<br />

produces peaks of good efficiency in a reasonable timescale.<br />

The response of the system to standard addition is linear and<br />

is applicable over a concentration range valid to seawater<br />

analysis. Additionally, the LOD achievable with the system<br />

means it should be capable of handling the low concentrations<br />

of aluminium expected in Antarctic seawater.<br />

At this stage, the system has not been successfully<br />

applied to the quantification of aluminium in a seawater<br />

sample. The method currently suffers from an enhanced<br />

fluorescent response most likely due to matix interferences<br />

of seawater. It is difficult to determine the extent of this<br />

enhancement since there is not a certified seawater reference<br />

material for aluminium; but it is believed that, at present, the<br />

system produces a response approximately three times higher<br />

than the true value. Studies are underway to eliminate<br />

this problem and are currently focusing on the removal or<br />

adequate separation of aluminium from the remainder of the<br />

seawater matrix.<br />

REFEREnCES<br />

1. Johnson K. S., Gordon R. M., Coale K. H.: Mar. Chem.<br />

57, 137 (1997).<br />

<strong>2.</strong> Brown M. T., Bruland K. W.: Limnol. Oceanogr.:<br />

Methods. 6, 87 (2008).<br />

3. Drabek O., Mladkova L., Boruvka L., Szakova J.,<br />

nikodem A., nemecek K.: J. Inorg. Biochem. 99, 1788<br />

(2005).<br />

4. Mitrovic B., Milacic R., Pihlar B., Simoncic P.: Analusis.<br />

26, 381 (1998).<br />

5. Fairman B., Sanz-Medel A., Jones P., Evans E. H.: Analyst.<br />

123, 699 (1998).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!