2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures
2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures
2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Environmental Chemistry & Technology<br />
tion of negatively charged aluminium complexes in seawater<br />
(e.g. fluoro complexes) and the high ionic strength of the eluent.<br />
The effect of ionic strength has been reported to affect<br />
the retention of ions in chelation IC 8,16 . In an environment<br />
of sufficiently high ionic strength the repulsion between<br />
negatively charged aluminium species and the iminodiacetic<br />
acid functional groups may be reduced. This can result<br />
in a subsequent increase in retention time as observed in our<br />
studies. This response is actually considered favourable as it<br />
allows for additional stabilisation of the baseline between the<br />
minor dip in fluorescence and elution of the aluminium.<br />
Fig. <strong>2.</strong> Effect of increasing sample volume on column performance<br />
and fluorescence response<br />
S e a w a t e r S a m p l e s<br />
At this stage, the optimised HPCIC system coupled with<br />
fluorescence detection had been shown to be applicable to the<br />
determination of aluminium in acidified standards prepared<br />
in Milli-Q water. Previous work by us has shown that IDAS<br />
can be successfully applied to the analysis of samples with a<br />
complex matrix but it had not yet been used for the detection<br />
of aluminium in seawater. Seawater is difficult to analyse not<br />
only in terms of the high salt content, but also due to the<br />
number of other potentially interfering ions, such as iron and<br />
magnesium. However, preliminary chromatograms showed<br />
no co-elution problems and there was only one additional<br />
peak (at ~ 8 min) other than aluminium. Based on previous<br />
findings this peak is likely to be due to iron and/or a mixture<br />
other analytes e.g. sodium and calcium.<br />
Calibration of the system using a 500 µl sample loop<br />
was carried out by means of standard addition to an Antarctic<br />
seawater sample containing low levels of aluminium. The<br />
limit of detection was determined from the standard deviation<br />
of clean seawater and determining the signal equivalent to<br />
three times this value (i.e. 3σ). A LOD of 0.39 nM was achieved<br />
using a 500 µl sample loop. Good linearity of the system<br />
was observed between 1.8 and 36 nM.<br />
Chromatograms of Antarctic seawater for different injection<br />
volumes are given in Fig. 3.<br />
s322<br />
Fig. 3. Chromatogram of Antarctic seawater for different injection<br />
volumes<br />
Conclusions<br />
The optimised HPCIC system with fluorescence detection<br />
of the aluminium-lumogallion complex shows<br />
promise for the quantification of aluminium in Antarctic<br />
seawater. The IDAS chromatographic column does not suffer<br />
from issues such as co-elution of species with aluminium and<br />
produces peaks of good efficiency in a reasonable timescale.<br />
The response of the system to standard addition is linear and<br />
is applicable over a concentration range valid to seawater<br />
analysis. Additionally, the LOD achievable with the system<br />
means it should be capable of handling the low concentrations<br />
of aluminium expected in Antarctic seawater.<br />
At this stage, the system has not been successfully<br />
applied to the quantification of aluminium in a seawater<br />
sample. The method currently suffers from an enhanced<br />
fluorescent response most likely due to matix interferences<br />
of seawater. It is difficult to determine the extent of this<br />
enhancement since there is not a certified seawater reference<br />
material for aluminium; but it is believed that, at present, the<br />
system produces a response approximately three times higher<br />
than the true value. Studies are underway to eliminate<br />
this problem and are currently focusing on the removal or<br />
adequate separation of aluminium from the remainder of the<br />
seawater matrix.<br />
REFEREnCES<br />
1. Johnson K. S., Gordon R. M., Coale K. H.: Mar. Chem.<br />
57, 137 (1997).<br />
<strong>2.</strong> Brown M. T., Bruland K. W.: Limnol. Oceanogr.:<br />
Methods. 6, 87 (2008).<br />
3. Drabek O., Mladkova L., Boruvka L., Szakova J.,<br />
nikodem A., nemecek K.: J. Inorg. Biochem. 99, 1788<br />
(2005).<br />
4. Mitrovic B., Milacic R., Pihlar B., Simoncic P.: Analusis.<br />
26, 381 (1998).<br />
5. Fairman B., Sanz-Medel A., Jones P., Evans E. H.: Analyst.<br />
123, 699 (1998).