2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures
2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures
2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Environmental Chemistry & Technology<br />
20 digital images of randomly chosen different places ocross<br />
the glass plate were recorded using CCD camera PixeLInK<br />
PL-A662 mounted on the nikon microscope. At every recorded<br />
image, the number of living cells N L (green flurescence)<br />
and dead cells N D (orange fluorescence) was counted. Then,<br />
the survival ratio SR was calculated:<br />
NL<br />
SR =<br />
N +<br />
L D<br />
Results<br />
After irradiating Candida vini suspension deposited on<br />
the 100 R glass plate a significant inactivation was observed<br />
– the SR dropped to 0.032 ± 0.023 within 70 minutes. On the<br />
other hand, the non-irradiated sample showed no inactivation<br />
within 70 minutes. These observations are in a good compliance<br />
with the results of Seven et al. 4 , who also observed<br />
no inactivation of microbes on titanium dioxide in darkness.<br />
Only very small inactivation was observed on an irradiated<br />
bare glass without the catalyst layer. (Figs. 1., <strong>2.</strong>).<br />
These results are in agreemnet with the observations<br />
made by Kühna et al. 3 , who irradiated bacteria Pseudomonas<br />
aeruginosa on a glass plate covered with titanium dioxide.<br />
They found out that bacreial cell inactivation takes place.<br />
This phenomenon was explained to be caused by the oxidative<br />
stress of oxygen radicals inside cells during the exposure<br />
by UV-A radiation. Once the stress rises over a certain<br />
threshold, the cell dies.<br />
Fig. 1. SR comparison for Candida vini at different conditions<br />
on R substrates<br />
A constant decrease of SR in a certain time from the<br />
reaction start was observed by Benabbou et al. 2 in the case of<br />
Escherichia coli. Cell mebrane damage resulting from photocatalytical<br />
processes leads to an increase in membrane permaebility<br />
and eventually to free outflow of cell fluids. Therefore<br />
both bacterial cells as well as molecules of intracellural<br />
organels can become the substrate of reactive oxygen species<br />
(ROS) attack. ROS react simultaneously with the cytoplasmatic<br />
membrane of living cells and with the remains of dead<br />
(4)<br />
s506<br />
Fig. <strong>2.</strong> SR comparison for Candida vini at different conditions<br />
on S substrate<br />
cells (polysycharides, lipids) at the same time. Our results<br />
also confirm this hypothesis.<br />
When we compare the inactivation rates for Candida vini<br />
on R and S substrates (Fig. <strong>2.</strong> and Fig. 1.) it becomes clear<br />
that the inactivation rate of Candida vini does not depent on<br />
the structure and topology of the catalyst layer, as long as the<br />
glass surface is well couted by titanium dioxide.<br />
Conclusions<br />
When comparing the photocatylic inactivation rate of<br />
Candida vini on two types of immobilised catalyst (rapidly<br />
printed and slowly printed titanium dioxide layers) it is<br />
possible to conclude that significant inactivation was observed<br />
on glass plates with very high sol loading, i.e. with very<br />
well covered surface (samples 100 R, 95 R, 95 S). We also<br />
observe a certain decrease in the inactivation rate after reachicg<br />
the SR value of appr. 50 %. This might be caused by the<br />
simultaneous consuption of ROS both by the still living cells<br />
membrane as well as the organic remains of already killed<br />
cells. Almost constant SR value between 25 and 35 minutes<br />
suggest a competitive reaction pathway.<br />
Authors thank to Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports<br />
of Czech Republic for support by project MSM0021630501.<br />
REFEREnCES<br />
1. Huang n., Xiao Z., Huang D., Yuan Ch.: Supramol. Sci.<br />
5, 559 (1998).<br />
<strong>2.</strong> Benabbou A. K., Derriche Z., Felix C., Lejeune P., Guillard<br />
C.: Appl. Catal. B Environ. 76, 257 (2007).<br />
3. Kühn K. P., Chaberny I. F., Massholder K., Stickler M.,<br />
Benz V. W., Sonntag H-G., Erdinger L.: Chemosphere<br />
53, 71 (2003).<br />
4. Seven O., Dindar B., Aydemir S., Metin D., Ozinel M.<br />
A., Icli S.: J. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem. 165, 103<br />
(2004).