11.10.2013 Views

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Environmental Chemistry & Technology<br />

20 digital images of randomly chosen different places ocross<br />

the glass plate were recorded using CCD camera PixeLInK<br />

PL-A662 mounted on the nikon microscope. At every recorded<br />

image, the number of living cells N L (green flurescence)<br />

and dead cells N D (orange fluorescence) was counted. Then,<br />

the survival ratio SR was calculated:<br />

NL<br />

SR =<br />

N +<br />

L D<br />

Results<br />

After irradiating Candida vini suspension deposited on<br />

the 100 R glass plate a significant inactivation was observed<br />

– the SR dropped to 0.032 ± 0.023 within 70 minutes. On the<br />

other hand, the non-irradiated sample showed no inactivation<br />

within 70 minutes. These observations are in a good compliance<br />

with the results of Seven et al. 4 , who also observed<br />

no inactivation of microbes on titanium dioxide in darkness.<br />

Only very small inactivation was observed on an irradiated<br />

bare glass without the catalyst layer. (Figs. 1., <strong>2.</strong>).<br />

These results are in agreemnet with the observations<br />

made by Kühna et al. 3 , who irradiated bacteria Pseudomonas<br />

aeruginosa on a glass plate covered with titanium dioxide.<br />

They found out that bacreial cell inactivation takes place.<br />

This phenomenon was explained to be caused by the oxidative<br />

stress of oxygen radicals inside cells during the exposure<br />

by UV-A radiation. Once the stress rises over a certain<br />

threshold, the cell dies.<br />

Fig. 1. SR comparison for Candida vini at different conditions<br />

on R substrates<br />

A constant decrease of SR in a certain time from the<br />

reaction start was observed by Benabbou et al. 2 in the case of<br />

Escherichia coli. Cell mebrane damage resulting from photocatalytical<br />

processes leads to an increase in membrane permaebility<br />

and eventually to free outflow of cell fluids. Therefore<br />

both bacterial cells as well as molecules of intracellural<br />

organels can become the substrate of reactive oxygen species<br />

(ROS) attack. ROS react simultaneously with the cytoplasmatic<br />

membrane of living cells and with the remains of dead<br />

(4)<br />

s506<br />

Fig. <strong>2.</strong> SR comparison for Candida vini at different conditions<br />

on S substrate<br />

cells (polysycharides, lipids) at the same time. Our results<br />

also confirm this hypothesis.<br />

When we compare the inactivation rates for Candida vini<br />

on R and S substrates (Fig. <strong>2.</strong> and Fig. 1.) it becomes clear<br />

that the inactivation rate of Candida vini does not depent on<br />

the structure and topology of the catalyst layer, as long as the<br />

glass surface is well couted by titanium dioxide.<br />

Conclusions<br />

When comparing the photocatylic inactivation rate of<br />

Candida vini on two types of immobilised catalyst (rapidly<br />

printed and slowly printed titanium dioxide layers) it is<br />

possible to conclude that significant inactivation was observed<br />

on glass plates with very high sol loading, i.e. with very<br />

well covered surface (samples 100 R, 95 R, 95 S). We also<br />

observe a certain decrease in the inactivation rate after reachicg<br />

the SR value of appr. 50 %. This might be caused by the<br />

simultaneous consuption of ROS both by the still living cells<br />

membrane as well as the organic remains of already killed<br />

cells. Almost constant SR value between 25 and 35 minutes<br />

suggest a competitive reaction pathway.<br />

Authors thank to Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports<br />

of Czech Republic for support by project MSM0021630501.<br />

REFEREnCES<br />

1. Huang n., Xiao Z., Huang D., Yuan Ch.: Supramol. Sci.<br />

5, 559 (1998).<br />

<strong>2.</strong> Benabbou A. K., Derriche Z., Felix C., Lejeune P., Guillard<br />

C.: Appl. Catal. B Environ. 76, 257 (2007).<br />

3. Kühn K. P., Chaberny I. F., Massholder K., Stickler M.,<br />

Benz V. W., Sonntag H-G., Erdinger L.: Chemosphere<br />

53, 71 (2003).<br />

4. Seven O., Dindar B., Aydemir S., Metin D., Ozinel M.<br />

A., Icli S.: J. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem. 165, 103<br />

(2004).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!