11.10.2013 Views

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Environmental Chemistry & Technology<br />

Table I<br />

Percentage of the wind directions and calm in the Rožňava town [%]<br />

n n-E E S-E S S-W W n-W Calm<br />

38 8 6 2 25 2 3 6 10<br />

Table II<br />

The content of the selected elements in the solid dust outlets from thermal technologies<br />

Technologies<br />

Fe Mn Zn Pb Cu Cr Cd As<br />

[%] [ppm]<br />

Pelletizing 30.4 3.48 94 3<strong>2.</strong>6 99 39 25 636<br />

Rotary furnaces 27.8 <strong>2.</strong>12 200 127 170 63 24 176<br />

Table III<br />

The emissions of solid pollutants from the plant (1998–2007) [t year –1 ]<br />

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />

156.4 116.3 116.9 86.7 3<strong>2.</strong>9 63.3 63.8 121.5 155.8 148.4<br />

Table IV<br />

The average deposition of selected heavy metals and total deposition in the area of nižná Slaná (2001–2007)<br />

Parameter<br />

Total dep. Fe Mn Zn Pb Cu Cr Cd As<br />

[mg m –2 year –1 ]<br />

Minimum 8,621.0 1,221.0 60.9 9.54 0.35 1.67 1.09 0.033 1.49<br />

Maximum 32,537.0 9,636.0 631.3 63.12 <strong>2.</strong>81 5.73 4.36 0.078 28.84<br />

Average (n = 17) 18,155.0 4,543.0 27<strong>2.</strong>7 23.34 0.93 3.38 <strong>2.</strong>58 0.050 11.07<br />

Median 17,173.0 4,423.0 265.0 17.68 0.68 3.27 <strong>2.</strong>59 0.048 8.77<br />

SD 6,996.0 2,288.0 160.6 16.59 0.65 1.05 1.05 0.012 7.50<br />

were in the interval 8.6–3<strong>2.</strong>5 g m –2 y –1 . In most of sampling<br />

points a significant increase of solid pollutant emissions in<br />

2005 till 2007 comparing with previous years was not detected<br />

(total dust fallout). On the other hand, the significant<br />

increases of Fe, Mn and As deposition values were recorded<br />

using dust fallout analysis in the most of sampling stations.<br />

The samples of dust fallout were also subjected to X-ray<br />

diffraction (XRD) analysis. Thus, minerals such as quartz,<br />

chlorite, siderite, ankerite were detected. These minerals<br />

come from raw ore handling but also as a result of aeolation<br />

from surrounding environment. On the other side hand there<br />

are minerals, namely hematite, maghemite, magnetite and<br />

wüstite coming from the thermal technologies of the plant 2 .<br />

Table IV presents average values of deposition of<br />

selected heavy metals and basic statistic parameters for the<br />

whole monitored period and all sampling points. Qualitative<br />

composition of dust fallout unlike of its quantity significantly<br />

contributed to the ecological load of the individual sampling<br />

points that was caused by plant activities. Between various<br />

sampling points high differences in the deposition were<br />

determined mainly for Fe, Mn and As. There were not so high<br />

differences in the deposition with others elements. The most<br />

s310<br />

ecological load was situated in the south of the plant, in the<br />

central part of the valley. The statistical dependence between<br />

emissions of solid pollutants and deposition of observed<br />

metals (annual median) in the individual years by correlation<br />

analysis was evaluated. Relatively high positive values<br />

of correlation coefficient were calculated for manganese, iron<br />

and arsenic, namely 0.794, 0.764 and 0.749, respectively.<br />

Correlation coefficients for other elements were relatively<br />

low. The development of selected metal deposition (median)<br />

and the emissions of solid pollutants for the whole monitoring<br />

period is showed in Fig. <strong>2.</strong><br />

In the Slovak Republic there are not determined allowable<br />

limits for heavy metals deposition from dust fallout.<br />

That is the reason why relative comparison of heavy metal<br />

depositions for different localities is used for assessment of<br />

immission load.<br />

In the nižná Slaná locality, Fe deposition achieves high<br />

values because of solid pollutants emissions consist mainly<br />

of iron minerals. Fe depositions monitored in the individual<br />

stations were in the range from 1.221 to 9.636 mg m –2 y –1 .<br />

In Košice town with metallurgy industry, the values varied<br />

from 232 to 7.568 mg m –2 y –1 (ref. 3 ). In the Czech Republic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!