11.10.2013 Views

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Environmental Chemistry & Technology<br />

enrichment of As, Sb, Se and Te which enables the final use<br />

of ICP-AES.<br />

Volumes of up to 1,000 ml have no effect on the retention<br />

efficiency on Separon SGX C18, C8 and SGX RPS.<br />

The sorption is however quantitative from 500 ml only on<br />

SGX nH 2 , SGX Cn and SGX Phenyl. The weakening of the<br />

retention forces of ionic associate or complexes on the surface<br />

of sorbent may supports the subsequent washing out of<br />

the element species from the column.<br />

A p p l i c a t i o n f o r W a t e r S a m p l e s o n<br />

S e p a r o n S G X C 1 8<br />

Standards of folowing elements were spiked to equilibrated<br />

drinking, mineral and river water samples containing<br />

no detectable amounts of these elements. The Separon SGX<br />

C18 was previously conditioned by 10 ml of distilled water<br />

and 10 ml of 5 × 10 –3 mol dm –3 Septonex ® . The sorption was<br />

provided from 250 ml of sample solutions in the presence of<br />

1.68 × 10 –4 mol dm –3 PAR. Conclusions<br />

Table I<br />

The recovery (%) of arsenic and antimony in water samples a<br />

Spikes<br />

[mg dm<br />

c b<br />

element Arsenic Antimony<br />

–3 ] [mg dm –3 ]<br />

Mineral water<br />

0.25 0.01 58.30 ± <strong>2.</strong>44 98.74 ± <strong>2.</strong>70<br />

0.50 0.02 60.02 ± <strong>2.</strong>60 101.3 ± 3.40<br />

1.00 0.04 60.23 ± 3.36<br />

River water<br />

99.54 ± <strong>2.</strong>87<br />

0.25 0.01 59.71 ± 3.14 100.9 ± <strong>2.</strong>39<br />

0.50 0.02 60.90 ± <strong>2.</strong>69 97.26 ± 3.53<br />

1.00 0.04 6<strong>2.</strong>34 ± <strong>2.</strong>43 100.9 ± 3.09<br />

aThe analysis was carried out in triplicate and evaluated<br />

according Dean and Dixon6 bConcentration in 250 ml of water sample<br />

s498<br />

Table II<br />

The recovery (%) of selenium and tellurium in water samples<br />

a<br />

Spikes c element b<br />

Selenium Tellurium<br />

[mg dm –3 ] [mg dm –3 ]<br />

Mineral water<br />

0.25 0.01 100.5 ± <strong>2.</strong>57 100.5 ± 3.06<br />

0.50 0.02 98.60 ± 3.00 99.50 ± 3.07<br />

1.00 0.04 99.23 ± <strong>2.</strong>66 99.78 ± <strong>2.</strong>33<br />

River water<br />

0.25 0.01 99.78 ± <strong>2.</strong>71 100.8 ± <strong>2.</strong>35<br />

0.50 0.02 98.90 ± <strong>2.</strong>80 99.64 ± <strong>2.</strong>47<br />

1.00 0.04 101.7 ± <strong>2.</strong>11 100.2 ± 1.73<br />

a The analysis was carried out in triplicate and evaluated according<br />

Dean and Dixon 6<br />

b Concentration in 250 ml of water sample<br />

The separation and preconcentration of arsenic,<br />

antimony, selenium and tellurium in the presence of<br />

1.68 × 10 –4 mol dm –3 4-(2-Pyridylazo) resorcinol after previous<br />

conditioning with 5 × 10 –3 mol dm –3 Septonex ® was<br />

described in this paper. This procedure was successfully used<br />

for determination of these elements by ICP-AES in real water<br />

samples.<br />

REFEREnCES<br />

1. Sturgeon R. E., Willie S. n., Berman S. S.: Anal. Chem.<br />

57, 6 (1985).<br />

<strong>2.</strong> Jitmanee K., Oshima M., Motomizu S.: Talanta 66, 529<br />

(2005).<br />

3. Gabros S., Rzepecka M., Bulska E., Hulanicki A.:<br />

Spectrochim. Acta Part B 54, 873 (1999).<br />

4. Zhang L., Merita Y., Sakuragawa A., Isozaki A.: Talanta<br />

72, 723 (2007).<br />

5. Dressler V. L., Pozebon D., Curtius A. J.: Spectrochim.<br />

Acta Part B, 1527 (1998).<br />

6. Dean R. B., Dixon W. J.: Anal. Chem. 23, 636 (1951).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!