11.10.2013 Views

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Environmental Chemistry & Technology<br />

P70 SELECTION OF PACKING MATERIALS FOR<br />

bIOFILTER DEVELOPMENT<br />

IVETA ŠTYRIAKOVá and ALEXAnDRA VAŠKOVá<br />

Institute of Geotechnics of the Slovac Academy of Sciences,<br />

Watsonova 45, 043 53 Košice, Slovakia,<br />

bacil@saske.sk<br />

Introduction<br />

natural materials that are available in large quantities<br />

may have potential as inexpensive sorbents. Cost effective<br />

alternative technologies or sorbents for treatment of metals<br />

contaminated waste streams are needed. A study 1 reported<br />

that zeolites, clinoptilolite in particular, demonstrate strong<br />

affinity for Pb and other heavy metals. Adsorbing Cd and<br />

Zn examined by both modifications with natural bentonite 2 .<br />

Results showed that the acid-treatment decreased the adsorption<br />

capacity, while the heat treatment did improve capacity.<br />

Retention of Pb and Zn on pure calcite was the subject of a<br />

number of investigations 3,4 . On the contrary, the number of<br />

sorption studies of both ions on magnesite is very limited.<br />

Investigations on the biosorption mechanism of heavy<br />

metals show that the metal ions are deposited by adsorption<br />

to the functional groups present on the cell wall. Dead as well<br />

as living cells are used in the removal of metal ions 5,6 . The<br />

batch adsorption experiments demonstrate that the surface<br />

complexation approach can be used successfully to quantify<br />

the adsorption of Cd in a mixed B. subtilis – quartz system as<br />

functions of both pH and solute/sorbent ratios 7 .<br />

We are interested in the surface complexation approach<br />

of zeolite, bentonite, calcite, magnezite and also these materials<br />

with bacteria in the behavior various heavy metals in the<br />

batch experiments. The objectives of this work were to determine<br />

the differences of mineral/water and mineral-bacteria/<br />

water interface in sorption capacities of metals.<br />

Experimental<br />

The biosorption experiments were carried out in Erlenmeyer<br />

flasks which contained 10 g samples and 100 ml<br />

medium. The medium contained (per liter) 0.5 g naH 2 PO 4 ,<br />

1.0 g (nH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , 0. g naCl, and 2 g glucose. The flasks were<br />

inoculated with a mixture of Bacillus cereus and B. megaterium<br />

(0.1 g wet bacteria dm –3 ) that had been previously isolated<br />

from Horná Prievrana. The two strains were purified by<br />

heat treatment at 80 °C for 15 min followed by streak plating<br />

on nutrient agar cultures. The isolates were identified with<br />

the BBL Crystal Identification System (Becton, Dickinson<br />

and Co., Franklin Lakes, nJ). For identification, the isolates<br />

were cultivated on Columbia agar plates per manufacturer’s<br />

instructions.<br />

The flasks were incubated under dynamic conditions<br />

(150 rev min –1 ) for 3 hours at 25 °C. The liquid phase was<br />

contained individual metals in 0.5mM concentration in the<br />

forms ZnSO 4 , CuSO 4 , PbCO 3 . The spent media (leachates)<br />

were sampled for metal analysis. The chemical controls<br />

s476<br />

did not receive an inoculum but were incubated under otherwise<br />

similar conditions.<br />

Solid residues were analyzed by X-ray diffraction using<br />

a Philips X’Pert SW–binary diffractometer with CuKα radia tion (40 kV, 50 mA), equipped with an automatic divergence<br />

slit, sample spinner, and a graphite secondary monochromator.<br />

Data were collected for 2–60 °2Θ with a step width of<br />

0.05 ° and a counting time of 30 s per 0.05 °. The mineralogy<br />

has been evaluated in quantitative terms from X-ray powder<br />

diffraction patterns using a Rietveld-based data processing<br />

technique.<br />

Quantitative changes in the liquid phase were measured<br />

with a Model 30 Varian atomic absorption spectrometer<br />

(Varian, Inc., Melbourne, Vic., Australia).<br />

Batch experiments were conducted to measure:<br />

• Zn, Cu, Pb and zeolite adsorption in a mixed singly<br />

metals – zeolite – Bacillus system<br />

• Zn, Cu, Pb and bentonite adsorption in a mixed singly<br />

metals – bentonite – Bacillus system second<br />

• Zn, Cu, Pb and quartz sands adsorption in a mixed singly<br />

metals – quartz sands – Bacillus system<br />

• Zn, Cu, Pb and calcite adsorption in a mixed singly<br />

metals – calcite – Bacillus system<br />

• Zn, Cu, Pb and magnezite adsorption in a mixed singly<br />

metals – magnezite – Bacillus system<br />

Z e o l i t e<br />

The natural materials, zeolite was obtained from nižný<br />

Hrabovec location in Slovakia. The mineralogical composition<br />

of zeolite was clinoptilolite 51–68 %, quartz + cristobalite<br />

9–20 %, feldspars 8–13 %, mica 13 % and iron minerals<br />

0.3 %.<br />

Table I<br />

Chemical composition of zeolite<br />

Components SiO 2 Al 2 O 3 Fe 2 O 3 MgO na 2 O<br />

% wt. 67.0 1<strong>2.</strong>3 1.3 0.7 0.7<br />

B e n t o n i t e<br />

The natural materials, zeolite was obtained from Lastovce<br />

location in Slovakia. The mineralogical composition<br />

of bentonite was smectite 63%, quartz 21%, kaolinite 11%,<br />

feldspars 4-6% and calcite 2%.<br />

Table II<br />

Chemical composition of bentonite<br />

Components SiO 2 Al 2 O 3 Fe 2 O 3 MgO na 2 O<br />

% wt. 59.2 18.6 <strong>2.</strong>8 4.2 0.7<br />

Q u a r t z S a n d s<br />

The natural materials, zeolite was obtained from nižný<br />

Hrabovec location in Slovakia. The mineralogical composi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!