11.10.2013 Views

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Environmental Chemistry & Technology<br />

Fig. <strong>2.</strong> hPLC chromatograms of carotenoids from the Mougeotia<br />

sp. samples: a – control sample; b – illumination with<br />

4,500 μmol m –2 s –1 ; c – recovery after illumination. Peak identities<br />

are: 1: violaxanthin, 2: antheraxanthin, 3: lutein, 4: zeaxanthin,<br />

5: 5,6-epoxy-β-carotene, 6: α-carotene, 7: β-carotene, 8: 9Z<br />

– β-carotene, 9: 15Z – β-carotene<br />

a<br />

b<br />

c<br />

s440<br />

Conclusions<br />

The obtained data reveals the way in which the carotenoid<br />

pattern is affected by high light stress in the analyzed<br />

algal strain, as well as the way this reacts during the recovery<br />

stage.<br />

They proved that the xanthophyll cycle’s regulatory<br />

mechanism is functional in Mougeotia sp. algae, leading to<br />

an almost complete interconversion of violaxanthin to antheraxanthin<br />

and zeaxanthin. However, its contribution to nonphotochemical<br />

quenching is not as significant as in higher<br />

plants; the small amounts of zeaxanthin recorded during<br />

experiments suggesting that this strain posses another dissipation<br />

mechanism(s) which operates together with xanthophyll<br />

cycle.<br />

Hence, HPLC analysis revealed a particular behavior of<br />

Mougeotia spp. algae under intense illumination: the major<br />

de-epoxidation product of violaxanthin is not zeaxanthin, but<br />

antheraxanthin. More than that, the high light stress affects<br />

the whole carotenoid biosynthesis, starting with the violaxanthin<br />

cycle’s precursor: β-carotene.<br />

This work has been supported by 2-CEx06-11-54/ 2006<br />

research grant.<br />

REFEREnCES<br />

1. Darko E., Schoefs B., Lemoine Y.: J. Chromatogr. A.<br />

876, 111 (2000).<br />

<strong>2.</strong> Demmig-Adams B.: Trends Plant Sci. 1, 21 (1996).<br />

3. Goss R., Böhme K., Wilhelm C.: Planta 205, 613<br />

(1998).<br />

4. Masojídekl J., Kopeckýl J., Koblížek M., Torzillo G.:<br />

Plant Biol. 6, 342 (2004).<br />

5. Muntean E., Bercea V.: Studia Universitatis Babeş-<br />

Bolyai, Physica, L, 4b, 668 (2005).<br />

6. Sapozhnikov D. I., Krasnovskaya T. A., Mayevskaya<br />

A. n.: Dok.Acad.nauk.SSSR, 113, 465 (1957).<br />

7. Yamamoto H., nakayama O. M., Chichester C. O.:<br />

Arch. Biochem.Biophy. 97, 168 (1962).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!