11.10.2013 Views

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Environmental Chemistry & Technology<br />

P53 VOLATILE ORGANIC SubSTANCES PRESENT<br />

IN SPICES AND SPRuCE NEEDLES<br />

LUDMILA MRAVCOVá, MILADA VáVROVá, JOSEF<br />

ČáSLAVSKý, MICHAELA STOUPALOVá, ILOnA<br />

HLAVáČKOVá and HAnA VíTEČKOVá<br />

Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Purkyňova<br />

118, 612 00 Brno,<br />

mravcova@fch.vutbr.cz<br />

Introduction<br />

Essential oils are volatile lipophilic substances, usually<br />

colorless. Most often, essential oils consist of terpenes,<br />

namely monoterpenic hydrocarbons, aldehydes, alcohols,<br />

ketones, acids, esters. Their content substances are usually<br />

classified as isoprenoids and phenylpropanoids groups 1 . Their<br />

characteristic scent is conditioned by terpenic compounds, in<br />

general 2 .<br />

The TLC (thin layer chromatography) method can be<br />

used for the identification of essential oil present in spice 1 .<br />

This method is simple, without need of sofisticated and<br />

expensive instrumentation. Defined amount of the analysed<br />

mixture is applied on the starting line of a plate covered by<br />

a thin layer of sorbent (stationary phase). Chromatographic<br />

plate is then placed into the developing chamber with mobile<br />

phase, which rises slowly and evenly through the thin layer,<br />

transporting the individual components of the analyzed mixture<br />

by various speed. Dried thin layer with perceptible stains<br />

of particular compounds of the mixture situated in different<br />

distances from the start – represents TLC chromatogram. The<br />

identification of compounds is performed either via comparison<br />

of their migration distances with standards, or by<br />

comparison of their R F values with those obtained from the<br />

literature 3 .<br />

Another option to identify essential oils is application<br />

of SPME (Solid phase microextraction) in connection with<br />

GC/MS. Solid phase microextraction is simple and efficient<br />

sorptive – desorptive technique used for solventless isolation/<br />

preconcentration of target analytes from the sample matrix 4 .<br />

In the field, this procedure could be also used as passive sampling<br />

method. During this procedure, analytes are sorbed by<br />

thin layer of stationary phase placed on the SPME fiber. The<br />

SPME process continues until the equilibrium in the system<br />

is reached. In physical-chemical terms, the SPME technique<br />

state of equilibrium depends on the analyte properties and on<br />

the type and thickness of polymer covering the silica fiber 4 .<br />

Experimental<br />

For the identification of essential oils present in spice<br />

(caraway, cardamom, pepper, sweet pepper, calamint, cinna-<br />

mon and muscat), two methods were used 5 :<br />

•<br />

•<br />

TLC<br />

SPME, GC/MS<br />

s437<br />

T L C<br />

Spice essential oils isolation proceeded in the following<br />

manner. Spice samples were extracted by ethanol for<br />

10 minutes. After that, the extract was filtered and the spice<br />

was reextracted twice for 20 minutes by petroleum ether.<br />

Extracts were concentrated on the vacuum rotary vaporizer<br />

to the defined volume.<br />

By means of micropippete, concentrated extracts were<br />

applied on the chromatographic plate (Alugram Sil G). The<br />

distance of applied stains was between 0.5–1 cm, the volume<br />

of applied sample was always 10 μl and 20 μl. Ethanol and<br />

petroleum ether extracts I and II were applied on plates.<br />

Plates were developed in a closed chromatographic<br />

chamber, which was filled with a developing agent – mobile<br />

phase formed by the mixture of toluene and ethyl acetate<br />

(ratio 93 : 7). Developing was ascensive and was let in progress<br />

until the mobile phase reached the distance of 1 cm<br />

from the top of the plate. Plates were let to dry and then they<br />

were sprayed by developer for the purpose of visualization of<br />

stains created by separated substances. The used developer<br />

consisted of ethanol and sulphuric acid (ratio 95 : 5), which<br />

was mixed in 1 : 1 ratio with one-percent solution of vanillin<br />

in ethanol. After the chemical detection, plates were dried<br />

again in the drier at the temperature of 105 °C for 5 minutes.<br />

Identification of vizualized stains was performed via comparison<br />

of experimental R F values with those published in the<br />

literature 6 .<br />

S P M E – G C / M S<br />

Weighted amounts of individual spices (1 g) were put<br />

into vials. Substances from spice were sorbed from the headspace<br />

by SPME fiber at the temperature of 40 °C. The compounds<br />

were then directly injected into the gas chromatograph.<br />

The SPME fiber used was 65 μm polydimethylsiloxan/<br />

divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) from Supelco. Gas chromatograph<br />

with mass spectrometric detector was Agilent 6890n<br />

GC/5973 MSD. The HP-5MS column (Agilent Technologies,<br />

USA), 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm was used, the injector temperature<br />

was 270 °C, oven program was: 45 °C, 2 min, 5 °C<br />

to 200 °C, hold 2 min. He at a flow of 1 ml min –1 (constant<br />

flow mode) was used as a carrier gas, transferline temperature<br />

was 250 °C, ion source temperature was 230 °C, quadrupole<br />

temperature was set to 150 °C. Direct interface connection<br />

was applied, electron ionization at 70 eV was employed.<br />

Results<br />

TLC chromatograms evaluation was performed in<br />

accordance with requirements of the Pharmaceutical Codex 6<br />

, which is valid for phytopharmaca and recomends TLC as<br />

an optimum screening method. R F values were calculated<br />

for each of detected stains. This factor was also used for the<br />

identification. Besides the retention factor, also the colours of<br />

the stains were compared. For example, the comparison of all<br />

sweet pepper extracts shows Table I. In column “Identified<br />

Compound”, unambiguously identified content substance

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!