2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures
2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures
2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Environmental Chemistry & Technology<br />
Table I<br />
The regression equation for different selected systems<br />
U (VI) Solution regression equation<br />
Basic a y = 4.48x + 1.29<br />
Septonex b y = 4.49x + 0.23<br />
Dodecylsulphate c y = 5.37x + 1.08<br />
0.75 mol dm –3 HnO3 y = 4.04x + <strong>2.</strong>18<br />
1 mol dm –3 HCl y = 3.75x + 3.18<br />
PAR d y = 4.95x + 1.32<br />
APDC e y = 4.83x + 0.43<br />
a calibration plots for 1 mg dm –3 –15 mg dm –3 U without orga-<br />
nic reagents ;<br />
b 3 × 10 –3 mol dm –3 Septonex;<br />
c 3 × 10-3 mol dm –3 sodium dodecylsulphate;<br />
d 2 × 10 –5 mol dm –3 PAR;<br />
e 3 × 10 –5 mol dm –3 APDCin solution<br />
Al 3+ . The 10 : 1 excess of multicomponent standards containing<br />
Br – , Cl – , Br – , SO 4 2– , PO4 3– or Cd 2+ , Co 2+ , Cr 3+ , Cu 2+ ,<br />
Mn 2+ , Pb 2+ , V 5+ and Zn 2+ (each of metal ion) in the absence<br />
or presence of Y 3+ internal standard (1 mg dm –3 ) did not<br />
interfere. 10 : 1 excess of Fe 3+ interferes strongly by the 50%<br />
signal decrease in the presence of Y 3+ .<br />
D e t e r m i n a t i o n o f U r a n i u m b y I C P -<br />
A E S A f t e r t h e P r e c o n c e n t r a t i o n o n<br />
M o d i f i e d A m b e r l i t e X A D 4<br />
Prior to the sorption, the column was conditioned by<br />
10 ml of 5 × 10 –3 mol dm –3 Septonex whose pH was adjusted<br />
by hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide. This procedure<br />
was always used for the sorption.<br />
E f f e c t o f S u r f a c t a n t s a n d O r g a n i c<br />
R e a g e n t s<br />
The retention efficiency of 3 mg dm –3 U from 50 ml<br />
volume with the optimal pH 9 without surfactants and organic<br />
reagents was 56 % only. The elution of uranium from the<br />
column was carried out with 10 ml acetone and 1 mol dm –3<br />
nitric HnO3 (1 : 1). The various surfactants were used such<br />
as non-ionic Brij 35, cationic Septonex or Zephyramine<br />
and anionic dodecyl sulphate respectively, from which<br />
5 × 10 –3 mol dm –3 of Septonex was optimal for conditioning<br />
and allowed the recovery of 96 % U. The recovery with<br />
dodecylsulphate was 81 % U. Brij 35 produced a foam in the<br />
column and Zephyramine did not prevent turbidity during<br />
evaporation, when HnO3 was used for elution.<br />
Moreover the sorption of 1.5–15 mg dm –3 of U was<br />
quantitative by using 6 × 10 –5 mol dm –3 PAR and 9 × 10–5<br />
– 1.8 × 10 –4 mol dm –3 APDC which corresponds with the 5 or<br />
10 fold excess of reagent and the recovery nearly 100 % was<br />
obtained in the presence of 1.3 × 10 –4 mol dm –3 8-HQS and<br />
1.4 × 10 –4 mol dm –3 PYR. Thus, 6 × 10 –5 mol dm –3 of PAR was<br />
recommended for following preconcentration.<br />
s433<br />
Fig. 1. Effect of organic reagents. pH = 5; pH = 7;<br />
pH = 9; a 6 × 10 –5 mol dm –3 PAR, b 1.2 × 10 –4 mol dm –3 PAR,<br />
c 9 × 10 –5 mol dm –3 APDC, d 1.8 × 10 –4 mol dm –3 APDC,<br />
e 6.7 × 10 –5 mol dm –3 8-hQS, f 1.3 × 10 –4 mol dm –3 8-hQS,<br />
g 1.4 × 10 –4 mol dm –3 PyR; h <strong>2.</strong>7 × 10 –4 mol dm –3 PyR, 3 mg dm –3 u<br />
was sorbed after conditioning the sorbent with 5 × 10 –3 mol dm –3<br />
Septonex solution<br />
E f f e c t o f p H<br />
The influence of pH on the sorption follows from Table II.<br />
The sorption was quantitative in the interval of pH 7–9.<br />
Table II<br />
Effect of pH on the sorption a<br />
pH recovery [%]<br />
9 100.0 ± 3.6<br />
8 99.5 ± 3.7<br />
7 100.6 ± <strong>2.</strong>4<br />
6 89.6 ± 4.8<br />
5 88.6 ± 5.3<br />
4 8<strong>2.</strong>7 ± 0.9<br />
a From 50 ml of sample with 3 mg dm –3 U, in the presence<br />
of 6 × 10 –5 mol dm –3 PAR and after conditioning the sorbent<br />
with 5 × 10 –3 mol dm –3 Septonex solution. The sorption was<br />
carried out in triplicate<br />
E f f e c t o f E l u e n t s<br />
For the quantitative elution of the complex of uranium<br />
(VI) with the used reagents, acetone, ethanol and methanol<br />
in different ratio with 1 mol dm –3 nitric acid were tested. The<br />
most effective eluent with 100% recovery of U was 10 ml of<br />
1 : 1 acetone and 1 mol dm –3 nitric acid or the 1 : 1 mixture of<br />
acetone and 4 mol dm –3 HnO 3 mixtures. The best eluents are<br />
compared in Table III.<br />
Conclusions<br />
The sorbent XAD-4 in the presence of 4-(2pyridylazo)resorcinol<br />
or pyrrollidincarbodithioate was<br />
observed for the separation and preconcentration of Uranium<br />
(VI) at pH 9. The column of Amberlite XAD 4 of<br />
particle size 0.32–0.63 µm was washed with 10 ml of acetone<br />
and 10 ml of distilled water, and conditioned with