11.10.2013 Views

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Environmental Chemistry & Technology<br />

Table I<br />

The regression equation for different selected systems<br />

U (VI) Solution regression equation<br />

Basic a y = 4.48x + 1.29<br />

Septonex b y = 4.49x + 0.23<br />

Dodecylsulphate c y = 5.37x + 1.08<br />

0.75 mol dm –3 HnO3 y = 4.04x + <strong>2.</strong>18<br />

1 mol dm –3 HCl y = 3.75x + 3.18<br />

PAR d y = 4.95x + 1.32<br />

APDC e y = 4.83x + 0.43<br />

a calibration plots for 1 mg dm –3 –15 mg dm –3 U without orga-<br />

nic reagents ;<br />

b 3 × 10 –3 mol dm –3 Septonex;<br />

c 3 × 10-3 mol dm –3 sodium dodecylsulphate;<br />

d 2 × 10 –5 mol dm –3 PAR;<br />

e 3 × 10 –5 mol dm –3 APDCin solution<br />

Al 3+ . The 10 : 1 excess of multicomponent standards containing<br />

Br – , Cl – , Br – , SO 4 2– , PO4 3– or Cd 2+ , Co 2+ , Cr 3+ , Cu 2+ ,<br />

Mn 2+ , Pb 2+ , V 5+ and Zn 2+ (each of metal ion) in the absence<br />

or presence of Y 3+ internal standard (1 mg dm –3 ) did not<br />

interfere. 10 : 1 excess of Fe 3+ interferes strongly by the 50%<br />

signal decrease in the presence of Y 3+ .<br />

D e t e r m i n a t i o n o f U r a n i u m b y I C P -<br />

A E S A f t e r t h e P r e c o n c e n t r a t i o n o n<br />

M o d i f i e d A m b e r l i t e X A D 4<br />

Prior to the sorption, the column was conditioned by<br />

10 ml of 5 × 10 –3 mol dm –3 Septonex whose pH was adjusted<br />

by hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide. This procedure<br />

was always used for the sorption.<br />

E f f e c t o f S u r f a c t a n t s a n d O r g a n i c<br />

R e a g e n t s<br />

The retention efficiency of 3 mg dm –3 U from 50 ml<br />

volume with the optimal pH 9 without surfactants and organic<br />

reagents was 56 % only. The elution of uranium from the<br />

column was carried out with 10 ml acetone and 1 mol dm –3<br />

nitric HnO3 (1 : 1). The various surfactants were used such<br />

as non-ionic Brij 35, cationic Septonex or Zephyramine<br />

and anionic dodecyl sulphate respectively, from which<br />

5 × 10 –3 mol dm –3 of Septonex was optimal for conditioning<br />

and allowed the recovery of 96 % U. The recovery with<br />

dodecylsulphate was 81 % U. Brij 35 produced a foam in the<br />

column and Zephyramine did not prevent turbidity during<br />

evaporation, when HnO3 was used for elution.<br />

Moreover the sorption of 1.5–15 mg dm –3 of U was<br />

quantitative by using 6 × 10 –5 mol dm –3 PAR and 9 × 10–5<br />

– 1.8 × 10 –4 mol dm –3 APDC which corresponds with the 5 or<br />

10 fold excess of reagent and the recovery nearly 100 % was<br />

obtained in the presence of 1.3 × 10 –4 mol dm –3 8-HQS and<br />

1.4 × 10 –4 mol dm –3 PYR. Thus, 6 × 10 –5 mol dm –3 of PAR was<br />

recommended for following preconcentration.<br />

s433<br />

Fig. 1. Effect of organic reagents. pH = 5; pH = 7;<br />

pH = 9; a 6 × 10 –5 mol dm –3 PAR, b 1.2 × 10 –4 mol dm –3 PAR,<br />

c 9 × 10 –5 mol dm –3 APDC, d 1.8 × 10 –4 mol dm –3 APDC,<br />

e 6.7 × 10 –5 mol dm –3 8-hQS, f 1.3 × 10 –4 mol dm –3 8-hQS,<br />

g 1.4 × 10 –4 mol dm –3 PyR; h <strong>2.</strong>7 × 10 –4 mol dm –3 PyR, 3 mg dm –3 u<br />

was sorbed after conditioning the sorbent with 5 × 10 –3 mol dm –3<br />

Septonex solution<br />

E f f e c t o f p H<br />

The influence of pH on the sorption follows from Table II.<br />

The sorption was quantitative in the interval of pH 7–9.<br />

Table II<br />

Effect of pH on the sorption a<br />

pH recovery [%]<br />

9 100.0 ± 3.6<br />

8 99.5 ± 3.7<br />

7 100.6 ± <strong>2.</strong>4<br />

6 89.6 ± 4.8<br />

5 88.6 ± 5.3<br />

4 8<strong>2.</strong>7 ± 0.9<br />

a From 50 ml of sample with 3 mg dm –3 U, in the presence<br />

of 6 × 10 –5 mol dm –3 PAR and after conditioning the sorbent<br />

with 5 × 10 –3 mol dm –3 Septonex solution. The sorption was<br />

carried out in triplicate<br />

E f f e c t o f E l u e n t s<br />

For the quantitative elution of the complex of uranium<br />

(VI) with the used reagents, acetone, ethanol and methanol<br />

in different ratio with 1 mol dm –3 nitric acid were tested. The<br />

most effective eluent with 100% recovery of U was 10 ml of<br />

1 : 1 acetone and 1 mol dm –3 nitric acid or the 1 : 1 mixture of<br />

acetone and 4 mol dm –3 HnO 3 mixtures. The best eluents are<br />

compared in Table III.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The sorbent XAD-4 in the presence of 4-(2pyridylazo)resorcinol<br />

or pyrrollidincarbodithioate was<br />

observed for the separation and preconcentration of Uranium<br />

(VI) at pH 9. The column of Amberlite XAD 4 of<br />

particle size 0.32–0.63 µm was washed with 10 ml of acetone<br />

and 10 ml of distilled water, and conditioned with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!