11.10.2013 Views

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Environmental Chemistry & Technology<br />

The report states that the life expectancy will rapidly<br />

decline around the year 2030. Level of education and world<br />

economy will irrefutably collapse.<br />

Unrenewable resources are being fatigued and wasted,<br />

species of fauna and flora perish, water and air are being<br />

polluted, and number of natural as well as human-caused<br />

disasters is growing. Environment knows no frontiers. In the<br />

past years at international conferences attention was paid to<br />

greenhouse gases emissions, yet no success was reached. For<br />

example – the USA produce <strong>2.</strong>5 multiple of carbonic oxide<br />

emissions per person than Europe. In the USA the emissions<br />

production growth is eighteen per cent; the world average is<br />

nine per cent.<br />

A hectare of tropical forests disappears every two<br />

seconds. The species disappear from hundred to thousand<br />

times faster then they would when living in a harmonic<br />

environment.<br />

Water problems are increasingly urgent. What may happen<br />

is that this century will even become a century of a war<br />

over water, food and raw materials. Water means life. Lack<br />

of water is more and more apparent. Rivers, streams, swamps<br />

and moor land dry up.<br />

Unrenewable resources are being fatigued, wasted,<br />

species of fauna and flora perish, water and air are being<br />

polluted, and number of natural as well as human-caused<br />

disasters is growing. Environment knows no frontiers. In the<br />

past years attention was paid to greenhouse gases emissions<br />

at international conferences, yet no success was reached. For<br />

example – the USA produce <strong>2.</strong>5 multiple of carbonic oxide<br />

emissions per person than Europe. Water problems are increasingly<br />

urgent. Maybe this century will even become a war<br />

over water, food and raw materials.<br />

F a c t o r 4 – G l o b a l i z a t i o n<br />

Consequently to almost complex globalization the world<br />

is really or relatively diminishing, with no regard to continents,<br />

countries, districts. Mutual dependency of population<br />

is growing incredibly; consequences of individual’s mistakes<br />

significantly affect others.<br />

Here an essential question is to be asked: What is the connection<br />

between often absurdly defended freedom of individuals<br />

and at the same time the growing mutual dependence of<br />

people? Apart from freedom there is also justice and stability,<br />

balance and equality. So far we have been witnessing more of<br />

globalization of power, profit and exploitation. It is necessary<br />

to globalize responsibility for nature and people in it.<br />

Great attention is being paid to globalization in various<br />

discussions. It has its positive features as well as big negatives.<br />

We must find a way to tame it to avoid a great disaster.<br />

If we manage to run the globalization processes there is<br />

a chance for a positive development. It is good that Movements<br />

against wild globalization start to appear.<br />

s421<br />

F a c t o r 5 – I n t e g r a t i o n a n d<br />

D i s i n t e g r a t i o n<br />

Various groups come into being and on the contrary,<br />

states decay, therefore the there is bigger and undesirable<br />

atomization. People, regions and countries have their own<br />

interests, often of vital importance, which can be and are in<br />

contradiction with interests and aims of other countries. It<br />

is difficult do make compromise solutions. Politics and economics<br />

deal more often with the consequences than causes.<br />

Almost 20 new countries have arisen within the past 10 years,<br />

which have different political systems and aims, which are,<br />

apart from other, based on nationalistic principles.<br />

The role of international organisations changes – Un,<br />

EU, International monetary fond, World Bank, WTO, nATO<br />

and others. We can not say that the changes are always positive,<br />

transformation is essential.<br />

F a c t o r 6 – n C B W e a p o n s<br />

There are a growing number of countries which have or<br />

will have nuclear weapons. That increases the world insecurity<br />

as well as opportunities to destroy. Here is important to<br />

note the proliferation of military equipment and technologies<br />

of ambiguous use, like nBC weapons. Gun trade volume is<br />

not low. For example, in the last three years, American companies<br />

sold weapons for nearly 19 milliard dollars; French<br />

companies for 4 milliards dollars, and German ones for 1<br />

milliard dollars.<br />

Besides official, by governments approved gun trades<br />

there is a trade that is being tolerated and concluded by<br />

governments. There is also illegal gun trade.<br />

A big threat of today is a black market dealing with<br />

nuclear material and nuclear equipment. Gaining theoretical<br />

knowledge in the way of overpaying the specialists or<br />

documents is a current problem, too. non-proliferation of all<br />

kinds of weapons, especially nBC weapons has another side,<br />

too. It is that they are kept by countries that have already<br />

had them. The logic is simple – why do some countries have<br />

them, and why the others do not? Why can you have them<br />

but we cannot? Once these weapons exist, it is a question of<br />

time and money for the others to get them. The “others” can<br />

potentially mean terrorists. Why have these weapons actually<br />

been developed and why do they exist? If the development<br />

does not change, the world will take a risk of self-destruction.<br />

The danger can be bigger than it was during the cold war<br />

time. During the cold war time, these weapons “helped” keep<br />

peace, though the peace was unstable and faulted.<br />

There is a growing number of countries which have<br />

or will have nuclear weapons. That increases the world<br />

insecurity as well as a chance to destroy. Here is important<br />

to note the spread of military equipment and technologies of<br />

ambiguous use, like nBC weapons.<br />

F a c t o r 7 – V i o l e n c e G r o w t h<br />

It is easily provable that there is a quantitative as well<br />

as qualitative growth of violence. Here it is appropriate to<br />

remember Erich Fromm who defines violence as an urgent

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!