11.10.2013 Views

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ChEMISTRy & TEChNOLOGy 2.1. Lectures

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chem. Listy, 102, s265–s1311 (2008) Environmental Chemistry & Technology<br />

P34 MuLTI-RESIDuE METhOD FOR<br />

ThE ANALySIS OF PESTICIDES AND<br />

MyCOTOxINS IN CEREALS by LC-MS/MS<br />

OnDřEJ LACInA, JAnA URBAnOVá, ALEXAnDRA<br />

KRPLOVá and JAnA HAJŠLOVá<br />

Institute of Chemical Technology Prague<br />

Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6,<br />

ondrej.lacina@vscht.cz<br />

Introduction<br />

In the recent decade, liquid chromatography–tandem<br />

mass spectrometry (LC MS/MS) operated in a selected reaction<br />

monitoring mode, has become the main tool for the analysis<br />

of food and environmental contaminants presenting wide<br />

range of physico-chemical properties. This approach allowed<br />

the introduction of multiresidue methods with up hundreds<br />

target analytes determined in a single run. However, most of<br />

these methods are focused only on one group of food contaminants<br />

such as pesticides, veterinary drugs, mycotoxins,<br />

plant toxins, etc. Considering the fact, that sample preparation/detection<br />

principles are basically similar for most of<br />

these methods, we attempted to determine pesticide residues<br />

and mycotoxins - contaminants representing different sources<br />

of origin in single run. The comprehensive LC-MS-MS<br />

multi-residue method has been developed and validated for<br />

14 Fusarium toxins, 4 aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, 3 Alternaria<br />

toxins and 200 pesticides.<br />

Experimental<br />

C h e m i c a l s a n d R e a g e n t s<br />

Certified pesticide and mycotoxins standards were<br />

purchased from Dr. Ehrenstorfer GmbH (Germany), Riedel<br />

de Haen (Germany) and/or Biopure (Austria). Individual<br />

analyte stock solutions (concentrations in the range<br />

0.3–3mg ml –1 ) were prepared in either methanol or acetonitrile,<br />

depending on the solubility of particular analyte. These<br />

solutions were used for preparation of mixed standard solution<br />

in acetonitrile (10 µg ml) and stored in –18 °C. Deionized<br />

water for preparation of a mobile phase was produced<br />

by Milli–Q apparatus (Millipore, Germany). Ammonium formate<br />

for mass spectrometry was obtained from Fluka (Buchs,<br />

Germany). Acetonitrile (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and methanol<br />

(Merck, Germany) were HPLC gradient grade solvents<br />

for pesticide residue analysis.<br />

S a m p l e P r e p a r a t i o n<br />

5 g of sample were weighted into 50 ml PTFE centrifugation<br />

tube. Then, 20 ml of extraction mixture of acetonitrile/<br />

water/formic acid (75 : 24 : 1, v/v/v) were added and the tube<br />

was placed onto laboratory shaker for 90 min. After this time,<br />

the tube was centrifuged (Hettich, Germany) at 11,000 rpm<br />

for 5 min and aliquot of extract was diluted by a water in<br />

a ratio 2 : 1 and filtered through a 0.45 µm PTFE filter Iso-<br />

DiscTM (Supelco, USA), and transferred into a vial.<br />

s404<br />

H P L C - M S - M S A n a l y s i s<br />

The HPLC analyses of selected pesticides and mycotoxins<br />

were performed using an Alliance LC system (Waters,<br />

USA) equipped with an Atlantis T3 column (100 × <strong>2.</strong>1 mm<br />

I.D., 3 µm particle size, Waters, USA) maintained at 30 °C.<br />

The mobile phase contained 0.005M ammonium formate<br />

in deionized water (A) and methanol (B), flow rate was<br />

0.3 ml min –1 . The optimized chromatographic method started<br />

at mobile phase composition of 5 % of B and was hold for<br />

0.5 min, then rising linearly to 60 % of B and then 100 %<br />

at 15 min. This composition was held for 8 min to remove<br />

co-extracted matrix from column, 6min re-equilibration to<br />

initial mobile phase composition followed. Sample injection<br />

volume 8µl was used in all experiments.<br />

HPLC system was connected to tandem mass spectrometer<br />

Quattro Premier XE (Waters, USA) operated in positive<br />

electrospray ionization mode. The capillary voltage was set<br />

to 3,500 V, source temperature was maintained at 120 °C and<br />

desolvation temperature was 380 °C. The masses of parent<br />

and daughter ion, cone voltage and collision energy were<br />

tuned previously for each analyte and two MS/MS transitions<br />

were acquired for each of them.<br />

Results<br />

O p t i m i z a t i o n o f S a m p l e<br />

P r e p a r a t i o n<br />

QuEChERS extraction method published and extensively<br />

tested in a recent years 1–3 has become the widely used<br />

method for isolation pesticide residues from various matrices.<br />

QuEChERS method employs acetonitrile (MeCn)<br />

extraction followed by partition induced by added salts. If<br />

necessary dispersive SPE clean-up is performed. The partition<br />

step discriminate a lot of bulk matrix compounds such<br />

as sugars and/or acids, which would interfere with determinative<br />

step, however also recovery of polar target analytes is<br />

reduced. For this reason, the QuEChERS has not become an<br />

extraction method of choice for mycotoxins, especially for<br />

relatively polar B trichothecenes.<br />

It should be noted, that existing multi-mycotoxins<br />

methods are based on the extraction by MeCn i.e. use similar<br />

solvent as QuEChERS. Although the sources of food contamination<br />

by pesticides and mycotoxins are fairly different in<br />

their nature, from analytical point of view there are a large<br />

number of representatives of these two groups, possessing<br />

similar physico-chemical properties. On this account, it is a<br />

conscionable concept to put together analysis of mycotoxins<br />

and pesticide residues in one multi-toxin method.<br />

The bottleneck of such method might be the sample<br />

preparation step, since it is necessary to achieve acceptable<br />

recovery for all analytes and at the same time discriminate<br />

extraction of matrix components, which could cause suppression<br />

of ionization as far as electrospray (ES) is employed<br />

in LC-MS method. In principle, achieving simultaneously<br />

these two requirements is impossible, and, therefore the only<br />

feasible approach is to examine extract directly without any<br />

purification 4–5 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!