24.10.2012 Views

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the accounts <strong>of</strong> Elias Ashmole and Strype in order to present him as ―more <strong>of</strong> an impostor<br />

than an enthusiast‖, who was imprisoned almost as soon as he entered Prague, only to die<br />

trying to escape. 77 Mackay went out <strong>of</strong> his way to portray Kelley in an unflattering light:<br />

Strype‘s description <strong>of</strong> him as a ―gentleman‖ and ―famous English chymist‖ became<br />

―deficient in rectitude and right feeling...a vagabond‖; Ashmole‘s description <strong>of</strong> Kelley‘s<br />

famous chemical demonstrations became ―low cunning and quackery‖. 78 This unscholarly<br />

account coloured later historians‘ accounts, including Kelley‘s entry in the Dictionary <strong>of</strong><br />

National Biography (1891), which repeated many <strong>of</strong> the same errors, using Mackay‘s work as<br />

a reference. 79<br />

More recent scholarship has noted <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s credulity in Kelley‘s alchemical promises.<br />

In the first modern biography <strong>of</strong> John Dee, Charlotte Fell Smith observed that <strong>Cecil</strong> played<br />

the key role in the attempts to convince Kelley to return to England and asked ―what is to<br />

be said <strong>of</strong> a staid and sober minister like Burleigh being ready to credit the truth <strong>of</strong> Kelley‘s<br />

exploits?‖ 80 Ralph Sargent dismissed <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s interest in alchemy as a ‗weakness‘ noting that<br />

when Edward Dyer returned to England bearing news <strong>of</strong> Kelley and Dee‘s alchemical<br />

success ―in <strong>Burghley</strong> and Elizabeth he found attentive listeners. Alchemy, it happened, was<br />

a weakness <strong>of</strong> both <strong>of</strong> them‖. 81 To both Fell Smith and Sargent, a belief in alchemical<br />

transmutation was a flaw incompatible with their understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cecil</strong>.<br />

In his study <strong>of</strong> the intellectual environment surrounding Emperor Rudolf II, R. J.<br />

W. Evans provided much needed details <strong>of</strong> Kelley‘s career at the Imperial Court. By<br />

examining Czech documents, Evans demonstrated the important position that Kelley held<br />

in the Court, whilst dispelling a number <strong>of</strong> myths about his eventual demise. Evans‘<br />

recognised that the traditional view <strong>of</strong> Kelley as ―a thorough charlatan enjoying at most<br />

77 Ibid. p. 154.<br />

78 Mackay, Memoirs <strong>of</strong> Extraordinary Popular Delusions, pp. 153, 192-193; Srype, Annals Vol 3, pp. 133, 135;<br />

Ashmole, <strong>The</strong>atrum Chemicum pp. 481-84.<br />

79 Thomas Seccombe, ‗Kelley, Edward (1555-1595)‘, in Leslie Stephen (ed.), Dictionary <strong>of</strong> National Biography,<br />

London, 1891<br />

80 Charlotte Fell Smith, John Dee 1527 to 1608, London, 1909, p. 203.<br />

81 Ralph Sargent, <strong>The</strong> Life and Lyrics <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sir</strong> Edward Dyer, Oxford, 1935, 2 nd Edition, 1968, p. 105.<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!