24.10.2012 Views

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

limit. During just the last twelve years <strong>of</strong> Elizabeth‘s reign the war cost £3,500,000, almost<br />

entirely absorbing the Crown‘s £300,000 annual income. 73<br />

<strong>Cecil</strong>‘s best documented expression <strong>of</strong> his belief in alchemy occurred in the context<br />

<strong>of</strong> this financial desperation. Hearing that John Dee‘s former assistant Edward Kelley—<br />

now living in Bohemia—had succeeded in alchemical transmutation <strong>Cecil</strong> began a long<br />

campaign to convince the alchemist to return to England to aid the Crown‘s finances.<br />

Between 1587 and 1593, <strong>Cecil</strong> sent numerous letters, spies and envoys to Bohemia,<br />

entreating Kelley to return and perform his art for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the Queen. <strong>Cecil</strong><br />

genuinely thought that Kelley could be the solution to England‘s financial woes.<br />

Many popular misconceptions and dubious assertions about Edward Kelley<br />

originated in two contrasting early modern works: Elias Ashmole‘s <strong>The</strong>atrum Chemicum<br />

Britannicum (1652) and John Strype‘s Annals <strong>of</strong> the Reformation (1709). <strong>The</strong> appendix <strong>of</strong><br />

Ashmole‘s compendium <strong>of</strong> alchemical texts contains an account <strong>of</strong> Dee and Kelley‘s<br />

travels in Europe. Relating their discovery <strong>of</strong> ―a very large quantity <strong>of</strong> the Elixir in some<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the Ruines <strong>of</strong> Glastenbury-Abbey‖, Ashmole‘s account was concerned with tales <strong>of</strong><br />

Kelley‘s alchemical transmutations, rather than his communication with <strong>Cecil</strong>. 74 Strype, on<br />

the other hand, concluded that <strong>Cecil</strong> wanted Kelley more as a political informant than an<br />

alchemist, a notion accepted by <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s biographer Edward Nares. 75<br />

Charles Mackay included an account <strong>of</strong> Edward Kelley in his popular but poorly<br />

researched Memoirs <strong>of</strong> Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness <strong>of</strong> Crowds (1856). 76 In an<br />

attempt to chronicle popular folly, Mackay summarised many <strong>of</strong> the myths surrounding<br />

Dee and Kelley. Typical <strong>of</strong> most nineteenth century attitudes towards alchemists, Mackay<br />

repeated many uncorroborated assertions about Kelley. He expanded and elaborated upon<br />

73 C. E. Challis, <strong>The</strong> Tudor Coinage, Manchester, 1978, pp. 253-54.<br />

74 Elias Ashmole, <strong>The</strong>atrum Chemicum Britannicum, London, 1652, p. 481-83.<br />

75 Strype, Annals <strong>of</strong> the Reformation: Vol. 3, pp. 132-33; Nares, Memiors <strong>of</strong> the Life and Administration: Vol. 3, p.<br />

340.<br />

76 Charles Mackay, Memoirs <strong>of</strong> Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness <strong>of</strong> Crowds, London, 1856.<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!