24.10.2012 Views

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

patience had been exhausted. Desperate, de Lannoy petitioned <strong>Cecil</strong>, on 14 February,<br />

promising to transmute lead into gold with only a further two days work. 64 Evidently <strong>Cecil</strong><br />

was not appeased, as on 13 March the alchemist repeated the same promises to both<br />

Leicester and the Queen. 65 It was <strong>of</strong> no use—by this point de Lannoy had sealed his fate.<br />

A letter from Barbara de Lannoy, the alchemist‘s wife, to Leicester, unexamined by<br />

previous historians, reveals that the alchemist remained imprisoned long after the project‘s<br />

failure. Whilst the letter is undated, she wrote to Leicester after <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s ennoblement in<br />

February 1571, begging that her ―poore husbande may be delyvered oute <strong>of</strong> his most<br />

miserable captivitie and longe imprysonment‖ so that they could return to their native<br />

country. 66 Her previous appeals to <strong>Cecil</strong> had been unsuccessful, as he remained ―displeased<br />

in that my poore husband had spent the Quenes Majestys money‖. 67 However, Barbara<br />

claimed that if ―all our moveables and goods forcybly taken from us‖ had been sold for<br />

their real value, they would have covered the Queen‘s expenses. 68 As there is no record <strong>of</strong><br />

the alchemist‘s release, it is quite possible that de Lannoy passed his remaining days<br />

incarcerated in the Tower.<br />

One might expect that de Lannoy‘s deception would dissuade <strong>Cecil</strong> from the<br />

reliability <strong>of</strong> alchemical projectors. However, while the entire debacle may have dampened<br />

the Queen‘s enthusiasm for alchemical projects, <strong>Cecil</strong> remained optimistic about the<br />

prospect <strong>of</strong> transmutational success. A year later, with de Lannoy still imprisoned in the<br />

Tower, <strong>Cecil</strong> wrote to the English ambassador to France, <strong>Sir</strong> Henry Norris, regarding a<br />

letter he had received from an Italian alchemist living in Paris. Despite having ―earnestly<br />

moved her Majesty to have adventured some small piece <strong>of</strong> Money upon such a Man‖,<br />

64 Cornelius de Lannoy to <strong>Cecil</strong>, 14 February 1567, BL, Lansdowne Vol. 9 No. 53.<br />

65 Cornelius de Lannoy to Queen Elizabeth and Leicester, 13 March 1567, TNA, SP 12/42/30.<br />

66 Longleat House, <strong>The</strong> Dudley Papers, MS DUI/f.209r.<br />

67 Ibid.<br />

68 Ibid.<br />

86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!