24.10.2012 Views

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>of</strong> yeeres before Paracelsus time‖. 131 Scott Mandelbroke has noted Norton‘s determination<br />

in his other works to ―reinterpret the native English alchemical tradition in a Paracelsian<br />

vein‖. 132<br />

According to Norton, all diseases resulted from imperfections <strong>of</strong> these three<br />

elements in the body. Extracts <strong>of</strong> certain vegetables, animals, stones, and metals could be<br />

wrought by Art <strong>of</strong> fire that their purified Sulphurs Mercuries and Salts may<br />

be geeven to heale and help the imperfections <strong>of</strong> inward Sulphurs<br />

Mercuries and Salts declined from the harmonie <strong>of</strong> health. 133<br />

Given their use <strong>of</strong> alchemical techniques to restore the balance and unity <strong>of</strong> the body,<br />

Norton‘s treatments were clearly Paracelsian in nature. However, Norton also outlined<br />

―another way there is also much more philosophicall to come to the medicine‖. 134 He then<br />

described how an alchemist could combine the male and female <strong>of</strong> each element through<br />

the process <strong>of</strong> ―putrefaction‖ to create ―a fixed oile which is the Elixir <strong>of</strong> life curing all<br />

diseases‖. 135 Norton‘s directions for creating this elixir, the alchemist‘s philosopher‘s stone,<br />

are unusually comprehensible; they even include the proportions required. 136 Norton<br />

therefore demonstrates both the intrinsic link between alchemy and Paracelsian medicine,<br />

and his determination to appeal to <strong>Cecil</strong>, a non-expert in practical alchemy.<br />

Norton wrote the treatise with the intention <strong>of</strong> it being ―presented, passed, and<br />

avouched for under the patronadge‖ <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cecil</strong>, knowing him to be ―most singular and rare<br />

for learning‖. 137 Significantly, Norton acknowledged that ―although my good lord, you are<br />

[academia‘s] most cheefe piller and supporter, I feare not your parcialite‖. 138 Although<br />

Norton denied Aristotelian learning, he remained confident that his alchemical<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> nature, reinforced with biblical teaching, would appeal to <strong>Cecil</strong>. Norton<br />

concluded his dedication by describing<br />

131 Ibid.<br />

132 Mandelbrote, ‗Norton, Samuel (1548–1621)‘.<br />

133 Norton, ‗Summarie Collections‘.<br />

134 Ibid.<br />

135 Ibid.<br />

136 Ibid.<br />

137 Ibid.<br />

138 Ibid.<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!