24.10.2012 Views

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

himself as ―Samuel Rynevile and Norton‖ perhaps dates the manuscript to the 1590s when<br />

he wrote another alchemical work under the name ―Samuel Rinvill, alias Norton‖. 124 That<br />

he wrote the dedication from ―my house at Ligh [Abbots Leigh in Somerset]‖, the family<br />

home, suggests that it was written after his father‘s death in 1584. 125<br />

Little is known <strong>of</strong> Norton‘s life. <strong>The</strong> great-grandson <strong>of</strong> the famous alchemist<br />

Thomas Norton, like <strong>Cecil</strong> he attended St. John‘s College, Cambridge—although some<br />

forty years afterwards. 126 In July 1577 he dedicated to Queen Elizabeth ‗A key <strong>of</strong> alchimie‘,<br />

a wide-ranging alchemical work, building on the alchemical philosophy <strong>of</strong> George Ripley,<br />

which claimed, under the influence <strong>of</strong> Norton‘s friend John Dee, that Elizabeth was on the<br />

verge <strong>of</strong> acquiring the philosopher‘s stone. 127 It is unclear whether Norton ever won the<br />

royal patronage he sought. After his father‘s death, Norton became a prominent member<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Somerset gentry, and was active in local administration until his death in 1621. 128<br />

Despite Norton‘s university education, the medical philosophy outlined in the<br />

‗Summarie Collection‘ explicitly rejected Aristotle, and in turn Hippocrates and Galen, as<br />

―devoid and ignorant <strong>of</strong> this true magick natural where true physick is contained‖. 129<br />

Norton argued instead, that medicine should be based on ―the primary and true physick <strong>of</strong><br />

unite first revealed and had in the knowledge <strong>of</strong> Adam‖, reflecting the widespread belief<br />

that the biblical patriarchs had possessed great alchemical wisdom. 130 According to<br />

Norton, a universe based on the three alchemical elements—sulphur, mercury, and salt—<br />

was more compatible with both mathematic principles and the Holy Trinity than Aristotle‘s<br />

four elements. In doing so Norton was clearly influenced by Paracelsian ideas, however, he<br />

claimed that Hermes Trismegistus had been ―inspired by God with this science...thousands<br />

124 Norton, ‗Summarie Collections‘; Mandelbrote, ‗Norton, Samuel‘.<br />

125 Ibid. [Italics added].<br />

126 Mandelbrote, ‗Norton, Samuel‘.<br />

127 Charles Nichol, <strong>The</strong> Chemical <strong>The</strong>atre, London, 1980, p. 18. Parry, ‗John Dee and the Elizabethan British<br />

Empire‘, p. 663.<br />

128 Mandelbrote, ‗Norton, Samuel‘.<br />

129 Norton, ‗Summarie Collections‘.<br />

130 Ibid.<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!