24.10.2012 Views

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

home I have not seen‖. 120 Where Lock acquired this knowledge is unclear. Alchemy had<br />

been a largely foreign concept in Russia, and is generally considered to have only become<br />

influential from the early seventeeth century. 121 It is therefore likely that Lock would have<br />

obtained any alchemical knowledge from his fellow Englishmen in Moscow. Lock‘s<br />

position at the Tsar‘s Court certainly would have brought him into contact with Bomelius.<br />

Perhaps this connection convinced Lock that a demonstration <strong>of</strong> his alchemical knowledge<br />

would appeal to <strong>Cecil</strong>.<br />

Humfrey Lock spent a considerable amount <strong>of</strong> time in compiling his ‗Collections<br />

on Alchemy‘. At over forty dense pages, it was a significant alchemical work, and its many<br />

contemporary copies show that it remained influential until the middle <strong>of</strong> the seventeenth<br />

century. Lock clearly had a reasonable expectation that his compilation, coupled with his<br />

epistle outlining the potential medical benefits <strong>of</strong> his return, would appeal to <strong>Cecil</strong>. From<br />

his correspondence, both in England and from Russia, it is not unreasonable to assume<br />

that Lock had developed a good understanding <strong>of</strong> the kind <strong>of</strong> service that would appeal to<br />

<strong>Cecil</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong> alchemist Samuel Norton‘s medical treatise ‗Summarie Collections <strong>of</strong> True<br />

Natural Magick‘, dedicated to <strong>Cecil</strong>, is a significant example <strong>of</strong> an attempt to appeal to<br />

<strong>Cecil</strong> utilising alchemical and Paracelsian knowledge. 122 Despite this, the manuscript<br />

treatise has not previously been examined. Preserved in the Cambridge University Library,<br />

‗Summarie Collections‘ is not mentioned in Norton‘s Oxford Dictionary <strong>of</strong> National Biography<br />

entry, or any other lists <strong>of</strong> Norton‘s works. 123 Whilst the manuscript is undated, it was<br />

certainly written after <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s ennoblement in February 1571. Norton‘s identification <strong>of</strong><br />

120 Lock, ‗Dedicatory Epistle‘.<br />

121 N. A. Figurovski, ‗<strong>The</strong> alchemist and physician Arthur Dee: an episode in the history <strong>of</strong> chemistry and<br />

medicine in Russia‘, Ambix, Vol. 13, 1965, p. 43.<br />

122 Samuel Norton, ‗Summarie Collections <strong>of</strong> the True Natural Magick grounded upon Principles Divine and<br />

from the Writinges <strong>of</strong> Hermes Trimegistus and others the Learned Auncients: conteining the true<br />

Philosophie and Physick drawen into commune places‘, undated, Cambridge University Library MS KK1.3<br />

No.2.<br />

123 Scott Mandelbrote, ‗Norton, Samuel (1548–1621)‘, Oxford Dictionary <strong>of</strong> National Biography, Oxford, Sept<br />

2004; online edn, May 2008 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/20357].<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!