24.10.2012 Views

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

medicines. Amongst the collection <strong>of</strong> books bequeathed by Paddy upon his death in 1634<br />

were five <strong>of</strong> Paracelsus‘ most influential works. 71<br />

<strong>Cecil</strong>‘s choice <strong>of</strong> <strong>William</strong> Gilbert as a physician is also indicative <strong>of</strong> his opinion <strong>of</strong><br />

chemical medicine. Gilbert, who attended <strong>Cecil</strong> at his death, is best remembered for his<br />

great work De Magnete (1600), a natural philosophical treatise on the Earth‘s magnetism. 72<br />

While historians have traditionally placed Gilbert alongside Francis Bacon as a founding<br />

figure <strong>of</strong> modern science, recent studies have tended to place him within the context <strong>of</strong><br />

renaissance magic. 73 Rejecting Aristotle‘s view <strong>of</strong> the universe, Gilbert appealed to the<br />

authority <strong>of</strong> Zoroaster and Hermes Trismegistus. 74 His theory was in essence<br />

complementary to alchemy as<br />

Gilbert thought <strong>of</strong> attraction as a spiritual force, he held that the magnet<br />

had a soul (superior to man‘s soul), and he understood the Earth as mater<br />

communis in whose womb metals were formed 75<br />

This alchemical view <strong>of</strong> the growth <strong>of</strong> metals was prevalent during the sixteenth century<br />

and likely matched <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s own beliefs. 76<br />

Gilbert built up a successful medical practice in London during the 1570s, and<br />

served not only <strong>Cecil</strong>, but also the Earl <strong>of</strong> Leicester and other prominent figures at<br />

Elizabeth‘s Court. 77 Thomas Fuller‘s report that Gilbert utilised chemical medicine, having<br />

―addicted himself to chemistry, attaining to great exactness therein‖ is supported by the<br />

alchemical notes and prescriptions <strong>of</strong> the Paracelsian apothecary Edward Barlow. 78 Over<br />

the period from 1588-90, Barlow created a number <strong>of</strong> chemical medicines for Gilbert, and<br />

it is reasonable to assume that Gilbert administered some <strong>of</strong> these as <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s physician. 79<br />

71 Webster, ‗<strong>Alchemical</strong> and Paracelsian Medicine‘, p. 321.<br />

72 Stephen Pumfrey, ‗Gilbert, <strong>William</strong> (1544?–1603)‘, Oxford Dictionary <strong>of</strong> National Biography, Oxford, Sept 2004;<br />

online edn, Jan 2008 [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/10705].<br />

73 Paolo Rossi, ‗<strong>The</strong> Scientist‘ in Rosario Villari (ed.) Baroque Personae, Chicago, 1995, pp. 267-68.<br />

74 Ibid.<br />

75 Ibid.<br />

76 Pumfrey, ‗Gilbert, <strong>William</strong>‘.<br />

77 Ibid.<br />

78 Thomas Fuller, <strong>The</strong> History <strong>of</strong> the Worthies <strong>of</strong> England, London, 1662, p. 332.<br />

79 Alain Besson, ‗Classification in Private Library Catalogues <strong>of</strong> the English Renaissance, 1500-1640‘,<br />

Unpublished Phd <strong>The</strong>sis, University College London, 1988, p 264; Charles Webster, ‗<strong>Alchemical</strong> and<br />

Paracelsian Medicine‘, p. 323.<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!