24.10.2012 Views

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eminently qualified to deal with the problem. 43 Russwurin agreed with the common<br />

sixteenth century notion that sight ―cometh from the brayne‖, and that Jane <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s<br />

cataracts were blocking these emanations. 44 Having allegedly restored around thirty<br />

patients‘ sight, Russwurin <strong>of</strong>fered to enact an unspecified cure. <strong>Cecil</strong> took great care <strong>of</strong> his<br />

mother, now in her seventies and living in his manor in Stamford, and therefore must have<br />

had some confidence in the Paracelsian to even consult with him on the matter. 45<br />

<strong>Cecil</strong>‘s consultation is all the more remarkable given both Russwurin‘s background<br />

and his bitter public struggles with London‘s medical establishment. Russwurin recalled<br />

having recently cured in Hamburg ―one Richarde Turner that was lunaticus [a lunatic]‖,<br />

and rather than receiving any reward he was accused <strong>of</strong> ―the selfe same that nowe I am<br />

charged with‖. 46 While Russwurin did not specify the charges, along with his mention <strong>of</strong><br />

being maligned by ―superficially learned doctores‖, it suggests that <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s undated<br />

consultation coincided with Russwurin‘s high pr<strong>of</strong>ile trial on 22 April 1574 before the<br />

London Court <strong>of</strong> Aldermen. 47 Just weeks after Russwurin was granted denizen status, the<br />

Company <strong>of</strong> Barber-Surgeons accused Russwurin <strong>of</strong> numerous examples <strong>of</strong> medical<br />

malpractice. Amongst the charges were the prescription <strong>of</strong> a chemical powder which<br />

caused his patients internal blistering, and <strong>of</strong> blinding a man suffering from cataracts. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

claimed that Russwurin ―put out his eyes cleane, and so deprived him <strong>of</strong> all his sight‖. 48<br />

In total Russwurin stood accused <strong>of</strong> causing the death <strong>of</strong> at least twenty three <strong>of</strong> his<br />

patients ―by his rustical dealings‖. 49 <strong>The</strong> only account <strong>of</strong> the trial and Russwurin‘s supposed<br />

crimes survives in A Briefe and Necessarie Treatise Touching the Cure <strong>of</strong> the Disease Called Morbus<br />

Gallicus (1585), later published by one <strong>of</strong> the complainants, the surgeon <strong>William</strong> Clowes. 50<br />

He portrayed Russwurin as an unskilled charlatan, lacking in medical knowledge, who<br />

43 Ibid.<br />

44 Ibid.<br />

45 Alford, <strong>Burghley</strong>, p. 227.<br />

46 Russwurin to <strong>Cecil</strong>, Lansdowne Vol. 101, No. 4.<br />

47 Russwurin to <strong>Cecil</strong>, Lansdowne Vol. 101 no. 4; <strong>William</strong> Clowes, A Briefe and Necessarie Treatise Touching the<br />

Cure <strong>of</strong> the Disease Called Morbus Gallicus, London, 1585, pp. 12-13.<br />

48 Clowes, A Briefe and Necessarie Treatise, p. 11.<br />

49 Ibid., p. 11.<br />

50 Ibid.<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!