24.10.2012 Views

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> late 1560s saw the first significant introduction <strong>of</strong> Paracelsian philosophy into<br />

the medical marketplace. <strong>The</strong> College <strong>of</strong> Physicians and Company <strong>of</strong> Barber-Surgeons<br />

increasingly accused unlicensed practitioners <strong>of</strong> administering chemical medicines. 30 Even<br />

the prominent London physician <strong>William</strong> Bullein‘s Bulwarke <strong>of</strong> Defence Againste All Sicknes<br />

(1562)—a largely Galenist text which characterised alchemical practitioners as being small<br />

minded and reliant on ―brimstone, quicksilver, or litharge‖—also discussed Paracelsus‘<br />

theories and various methods <strong>of</strong> distilling chemical medicines. 31<br />

<strong>The</strong> German physician Valentine Russwurin was prominent amongst the<br />

immigrants spreading these new concepts. Described as a ―doctor, alchemist, surgeon,<br />

lithotomist, and optometrist‖ in his 1574 letters <strong>of</strong> denization, Russwurin exemplified the<br />

link between alchemists and physicians in the Elizabethan period. 32 Russwurin provides an<br />

excellent case study for <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s consultation with, and defence <strong>of</strong>, so called ‗irregular‘<br />

practitioners. As his gout became more and more debilitating, he turned to the alchemical<br />

polymath for treatment, sending Russwurin a sample <strong>of</strong> his urine. 33 Many Paracelsian<br />

practitioners claimed to be able to diagnose through the chemical analysis <strong>of</strong> urine, a<br />

practice which continued until the end <strong>of</strong> the seventeenth century. 34<br />

Russwurin opened his diagnosis to <strong>Cecil</strong> with a long defence <strong>of</strong> his practice and <strong>of</strong><br />

chemical medicine in general. In his defence, Russwurin attacked the medical<br />

establishment, amongst which, he claimed<br />

from my first cominge into this lande unto this tyme, there hath not<br />

escaped, as I am credibly enformed; a meale or meeting, where any <strong>of</strong> the<br />

universitye doctors have bene present, wherin I have not bene backbytten,<br />

sclaundered and also impudently (saving y. L. honour) belyed 35<br />

30 Pelling, Medical Conflicts, p. 119.<br />

31 <strong>William</strong> Bullein, Bulwarke <strong>of</strong> Defence Againste All Sicknes, London, 1562, p.10.<br />

32 Denization <strong>of</strong> Valentine Rawsworme, 25 February 1574, Public Records Office <strong>of</strong> the United Kingdom,<br />

CPR Vol. 6 Elizabeth I (1572–1575), London, 1939, p. 261.<br />

33 Valentine Russwurin to <strong>Cecil</strong>, undated, BL Lansdowne Vol. 101 no. 4.<br />

34 Allen G. Debus, Man and Nature in the Renaissance, Cambridge, 1978, p. 128.<br />

35 Russwurin to <strong>Cecil</strong>, Lansdowne Vol. 101, No. 4.<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!