24.10.2012 Views

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

demonstrated the divine spirit <strong>of</strong> life that moved all nature, which ―seemeth to agre with<br />

that Cornelius Agrippa hathe written in his second booke De occulta philosopia‖. 149<br />

Eden then claimed to have completed a similar work himself when patronised by<br />

Richard Whalley. He gave <strong>Cecil</strong> a full account <strong>of</strong> his alchemical experiment, in which he<br />

created, through transmutation, ―a hundreth sylver trees about an ynche high, so perfectly<br />

formed with trunkes, stalkes and leaves‖. 150 <strong>The</strong> seventeenth century alchemist Eirenaeus<br />

Philalethes in, Secrets Reveal’d: or, an Open Entrance to the Shut-Palace <strong>of</strong> the King (1669) also<br />

described an experiment that created ―tiny silver trees, with twigs and leaves‖. 151 Rather<br />

than a ―wishful fantasy <strong>of</strong> territorial acquisition‖, they were in fact observing a legitimate<br />

chemical process. Nineteenth century chemists such as Johann Wilhelm Ritter<br />

experimented with what they called ―Diana‘s silver tree‖. 152 <strong>The</strong> precipitation <strong>of</strong> nitrate <strong>of</strong><br />

silver by means <strong>of</strong> mercury created ―the form <strong>of</strong> a tree, producing a very beautiful<br />

appearance‖. 153 To alchemists the growth <strong>of</strong> the tree was ―evidence <strong>of</strong> a vital spirit or ‗seed<br />

<strong>of</strong> gold‘ at work ... the tree was a step in the process for making the Philosophers‘<br />

Stone‖. 154 It was <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s education that made Eden sure that he would be fascinated by the<br />

experiment, especially because <strong>Cecil</strong> had received the ―divine spark <strong>of</strong> knowledge‖ from<br />

John Cheke. 155 Eden was sure that anyone educated in the same intellectual traditions as<br />

himself would agree that ―there is nothing so delectable as to beholde the infinite powre<br />

and wysdome <strong>of</strong> god in his creatures‖. 156<br />

Throughout Eden‘s 1562 letter he referred to a number <strong>of</strong> authors in a manner<br />

suggesting <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s familiarity with their works. Some <strong>of</strong> these, such as Aristotle, Philo,<br />

149 Ibid.<br />

150 Ibid.<br />

151 Eirenaeus Philalethes, Secrets Reveal’d: or, an Open Entrance to the Shut-Palace <strong>of</strong> the King, London, 1669, p. 28.<br />

152 Roberto De Andrade Martins, ‗Orsted, Ritter, and Magnetochemisty‘, in Robert Michael Brain, Robert<br />

Sonne Cohen, Ole Knudsen(eds.), Hans Christian Ørsted and the Romantic Legacy in Science: Ideas, Disciplines,<br />

Practices, Dordrecht, 2007, pp. 347-349.<br />

153 John Comstock, A Grammar <strong>of</strong> Chemistry, Cambridge, Mass., 1825, p. 93.<br />

154 John C. Powers, ‗‗Ars Sine Arte:‘ Nicholas Lemery and the End <strong>of</strong> Alchemy in Eighteenth-Century<br />

France‘ in Allen G. Debus (ed.), Alchemy and Early Modern Chemistry: Papers from Ambix, Huddersfield, 2004, pp.<br />

525-526.<br />

155 Eden to <strong>Cecil</strong>, Lansdowne, Vol. 101. No 5.<br />

156 Ibid.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!