24.10.2012 Views

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

occultism‖. 75 Bowden sees Medicina as ―an unusual choice for a layperson not intending to<br />

practise medicine pr<strong>of</strong>essionally‖. 76 Perhaps Lady <strong>Cecil</strong> shared her husband‘s fixation with<br />

herbal and chemical medicines, like other gentle ladies such as Grace Mildmay, who used<br />

chemical treatments in her own medical practice. 77<br />

*<br />

Many supplicants seeking <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s patronage knew <strong>of</strong> his ongoing fascination with<br />

both the philosophical and practical implications <strong>of</strong> alchemy. Often university educated,<br />

they shared his understanding <strong>of</strong> nature and were exposed to a similar range <strong>of</strong> humanist<br />

and Aristotelian concepts. An appraisal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s relationship with two fellow Cambridge<br />

scholars, John Dee and Richard Eden, reveals more about a common fascination with<br />

alchemy developed through a common education. Examining the alchemist and herald<br />

Francis Thynne further demonstrates that <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s clients both knew <strong>of</strong> and utilised his<br />

interest in alchemical philosophical knowledge.<br />

Very little has been written on <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s problematic relationship with the most<br />

famous Elizabethan disciple <strong>of</strong> occult philosophy, and fellow Cambridge alumni, John Dee.<br />

Historians have generally argued that while <strong>Cecil</strong> found Dee politically useful at times, he<br />

was generally disdainful <strong>of</strong> Dee‘s particular brand <strong>of</strong> occult theory. 78 Dee certainly found<br />

<strong>Cecil</strong> an intimidating figure, in 1582 recording a dream in which he<br />

was deade and afterward my bowels wer taken out I walked and talked with<br />

diverse, and among other with the <strong>Lord</strong> Tresorer [<strong>Cecil</strong>] who was com to<br />

my howse to burn my bokes when I was dead, and thought he loked<br />

sourely on me. 79<br />

In many ways Dee embodied the ostentatious knowledge that Stephen Pumfrey and<br />

Frances Dawbarn have argued did not interest <strong>Cecil</strong>. 80 This thesis maintains that whilst<br />

75 John M. Forrester, ‗Tradition and Reform: Jean Fernel‘s Physiology (1567)‘, in Jean Fernel, John M.<br />

Forrester (ed.), <strong>The</strong> Physiologia <strong>of</strong> Jean Fernel (1567), John M. Forrester (trans.),Philadelphia, 2003, p. 3.<br />

76 Bowden, ‗<strong>The</strong> Library <strong>of</strong> Mildred Cooke <strong>Cecil</strong>‘, p. 16.<br />

77 Linda Pollock, With Faith and Physic: <strong>The</strong> Life <strong>of</strong> a Tudor Gentlewoman: Lady Grace Mildmay 1552–1620, London,<br />

1993, pp. 96-98.<br />

78 Peter French, John Dee: the World <strong>of</strong> an Elizabethan Magus, London, 1972, pp.194-197.<br />

79 John Dee, James Halliwell (ed.), <strong>The</strong> Private Diary <strong>of</strong> Dr. John Dee, London, 1842, pp 17-18.<br />

80 Pumfrey and Dawbarn, ‗Science and <strong>Patronage</strong> in England‘, p. 160.<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!