24.10.2012 Views

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

perform counter magic and to divine the identity <strong>of</strong> the perpetrators. 157 Seizing the<br />

opportunity to vilify his own long time enemy, Dee implicated Prestall in creating the<br />

images as part <strong>of</strong> a Catholic plot. 158 In fact, the images had been created by Thomas Elkes,<br />

whose ritual magic was aimed at the husband <strong>of</strong> an entirely different Elizabeth. 159<br />

Nevertheless, Prestall and his associates were arrested and under torture confessed their<br />

roles in the imaginary conspiracy. 160 With Prestall imprisoned for treason, and his<br />

allegations against Medley discredited, Medley regained his freedom.<br />

Medley‘s re-established reputation, previously overlooked by historians, allowed<br />

him to survive another alchemical scandal in August 1580. <strong>Cecil</strong> suspected that Richard<br />

Stanihurst, an Irish Catholic alchemist, was creating alchemical gold to fund Catholic plans<br />

for rebellion in Ireland. During a search <strong>of</strong> Stanihurst‘s house, Robert Beale, clerk <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Privy Council and one <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s trusted informants, found that Medley and Stanihurst had<br />

been exchanging letters on alchemical matters. 161 Stanihurst clearly shared an interest in the<br />

same elements <strong>of</strong> alchemy as Medley. His Toque De Alchimia (1593), dedicated to the<br />

Spanish King Phillip II, would pr<strong>of</strong>ess his expertise in both alchemical medicine and the<br />

alchemical transformation <strong>of</strong> copper. 162 Stanihurst claimed to have witnessed the<br />

transmutation <strong>of</strong> copper into silver in London in 1578, and although Medley‘s role remains<br />

unclear, it was certainly within his field <strong>of</strong> expertise. 163 So convincing was the<br />

demonstration that, as Stanihurst recalled, it ―convinced me <strong>of</strong> what I had until then<br />

thought impossible and led me to apply myself to the practice <strong>of</strong> this secret science‖. 164<br />

After confronting Medley with the evidence <strong>of</strong> collusion, <strong>Cecil</strong> accepted his assurances that<br />

while he had been discussing ―mineral matters‖ with Stanihurst, ―he denieth there was any<br />

157 Ibid.<br />

158 Ibid.<br />

159 Ibid.<br />

160 Ibid.<br />

161 Robert Beale to <strong>Cecil</strong>, 28 August 1580, TNA, SP 12/141/43.<br />

162 Richard Stanihurst, ‗Toque de Alchimia‘, BNM MS. 2058, trans. in David C. Goodman, Power and Penury:<br />

Government, Technology and Science in Philip II’s Spain, Cambridge, 2002, p. 43.<br />

163 Ibid.<br />

164 Ibid.<br />

146

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!