24.10.2012 Views

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter Four: Alchemy and Economic Projects<br />

Whilst the relatively prosperous state <strong>of</strong> Crown finances during 1570s and early<br />

1580s removed the urgent need for gold, <strong>Cecil</strong> did not ignore the potential <strong>of</strong> alchemical<br />

enterprise. Rather, alchemy played a role in his attempts to improve England‘s industrial<br />

competitiveness. First as Principal Secretary, then as <strong>Lord</strong> Treasurer from 1572, <strong>Cecil</strong><br />

initiated, supported and monitored a number <strong>of</strong> schemes intended to strengthen and<br />

expand the English economy. <strong>Cecil</strong> considered economic development to be a central<br />

factor in ensuring the security <strong>of</strong> England in an increasingly hostile European political<br />

climate. As distinct from <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s attempts to secure Crown finances, his industrial projects<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten had broader aims and a more distinct sense <strong>of</strong> coherent policy making. Both<br />

Elizabeth and <strong>Cecil</strong> were obsessed with securing the position <strong>of</strong> a Protestant England<br />

through the patronage <strong>of</strong> large scale industrial projects. <strong>The</strong>se projects would reduce<br />

England‘s economic dependence on imports from Catholic Europe, which could not be<br />

relied on in times <strong>of</strong> war. In this way they complemented an increasingly Mercantilist<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the economy, as contemporaries believed that securing a positive balance<br />

<strong>of</strong> trade was essential to increasing England‘s share <strong>of</strong> the fixed amount <strong>of</strong> available wealth.<br />

<strong>The</strong> historical debate surrounding Elizabethan economic initiatives has focused on<br />

whether <strong>Cecil</strong> had a clearly defined economic policy. Historians such as Norman Jones<br />

have argued that <strong>Cecil</strong> had no real understanding <strong>of</strong> the economy, and that he adhered<br />

instead to the medieval belief that ―the economic ills <strong>of</strong> the country grew out <strong>of</strong> greed,<br />

social climbing and lack <strong>of</strong> discipline‖. 1 Recently, however, Felicity Heal and Clive<br />

Holmes, through cataloguing the patterns <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s economic patronage, have persuasively<br />

argued that <strong>Cecil</strong> had a more cohesive understanding <strong>of</strong> the economy. <strong>The</strong>y maintain that<br />

1 Norman L. Jones, ‗<strong>William</strong> <strong>Cecil</strong> and the Making <strong>of</strong> Economic Policy in the 1560s and Early 1570s‘ in Paul<br />

A. Fiddler and Thomas J. Mayer, (eds.), Political Thought and the Tudor Commonwealth, London, 1992, pp. 172-73.<br />

117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!