24.10.2012 Views

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

payment. Peterson refused them; he needed the money not the materials. Considering the<br />

Queen‘s side <strong>of</strong> the bargain complete, Ferrers, declared that neither he nor the Queen were<br />

liable to pay the £500. 216 To ensure that ―her majesty and my selft to be cleerily discharged<br />

and free from all intereste, damages, losse, or costes‖ associated with the materials, Ferrers<br />

deposited the materials with the Senate <strong>of</strong> the town. 217<br />

Peterson argued that far too much time had gone by for the return <strong>of</strong> the materials<br />

to suffice. He obtained a letter from the Council <strong>of</strong> Lubeck, requesting fair treatment for<br />

their citizen. 218 Ferrers simply told Peterson that the issue was out <strong>of</strong> his hands. Peterson<br />

then wrote letters to the Queen, <strong>Cecil</strong> and Wilkes, ―beseechinge her majesties favor, in<br />

comandinge Mr Deputy to see me contented‖. 219 Ferrers, however, refused to deliver these<br />

letters. 220<br />

By August 1597, Peterson had taken his complaint to the Holy Roman Emperor,<br />

Rudolf II. <strong>The</strong> Emperor in turn commanded Ferrers and fourteen English merchants to<br />

travel to Prague to present their case by January 1598. 221 <strong>The</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong> the suit is<br />

unclear. Peterson wrote to one <strong>of</strong> the merchants, Robert Towerson, whom he still<br />

considered a friend, on 16 October 1597, stating that he also hoped to bring the matter to<br />

trial before a ―higher power‖ in the Court <strong>of</strong> the Bishop <strong>of</strong> Speyer. 222 <strong>The</strong>se lawsuits<br />

evidently worried <strong>Cecil</strong>; his scribbled notes <strong>of</strong> the urgent business concerning the 29<br />

November 1597 session <strong>of</strong> the Privy Council included ―<strong>The</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Peterson; <strong>The</strong> Cause<br />

<strong>of</strong> Stoade[Stade]; Letters from Ferrer‖. 223 <strong>Cecil</strong> consulted with the experienced diplomat,<br />

and former adversary <strong>of</strong> Edward Kelley, Christopher Parkins, on the matter. Parkins<br />

replied that the Queen would ―do hyr self wronge, yf de facto any powre be yealded to<br />

216 Protest <strong>of</strong> Ferrers. SP 12/254/46.<br />

217 Ibid.<br />

218 Rol<strong>of</strong>f Peterson to Robert Towerson, 16 October 1597, TNA, SP 12/264/147.<br />

219 Ibid.<br />

220 Ibid.<br />

221 Pronouncement by Emperor Rudolf II, 17 August 1597, TNA, SP 80/1 f.211r.<br />

222 Peterson to Towerson, SP 12/264/147.<br />

223 Memorial by <strong>Cecil</strong>, 29 November 1597, TNA, SP 12/265/22.<br />

113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!