24.10.2012 Views

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

£500 from the company, they were to repeat the story about the expert told by Smith. 200<br />

Five days before the deadline, on 15 April 1595, Peterson arrived at Stade, demanding<br />

either the glass vessels or the money. Thomas Ferrers, deputy governor <strong>of</strong> the Merchant<br />

adventurers, reassured Peterson that some orders would come with the next ships and<br />

wrote to <strong>Cecil</strong> seeking direction. 201 <strong>The</strong> tone <strong>of</strong> his letter suggests that Ferrers had not yet<br />

received the glass bodies or his orders from Wilkes. Playing for time, and playing down<br />

Elizabeth‘s interest, <strong>Cecil</strong> replied that he had never heard <strong>of</strong> the Queen‘s promises to<br />

Peterson, and surmised the letter to be a forgery. 202 <strong>Cecil</strong> therefore ordered Ferrers not to<br />

pay Peterson. <strong>Cecil</strong> feigned ignorance, as his later letters show that he had been intimately<br />

involved in arranging Smith‘s scheme.<br />

On 28 April 1595, having finally received the materials and his instructions from<br />

Wilkes, Ferrers wrote to Peterson explaining that their German expert was ill and they<br />

needed more time. <strong>The</strong>re are conflicting accounts <strong>of</strong> Peterson‘s response to the delays.<br />

Peterson claimed to have written to Ferrers a number <strong>of</strong> times, demanding an explanation.<br />

Frustrated, he eventually protested to the chief magistrate <strong>of</strong> Stade, demanding Ferrers pay<br />

him the £500. 203 Ferrers‘ counter protest <strong>of</strong> 28 February 1596 tells a very different story.<br />

According to Ferrers, Peterson had been content to wait for the Queen to obtain a suitable<br />

expert. 204 On the last day <strong>of</strong> September, Peterson, supposedly and without any prior<br />

warning, demanded immediate payment <strong>of</strong> the £500. 205 Ferrers insisted that he had ―never<br />

ben certefyed any waye <strong>of</strong> [Peterson‘s] mislike ther<strong>of</strong>‖ and indignantly protested that<br />

―Peeterson hath faire forgotten himself, and remembers not the highe estate <strong>of</strong> the sacred<br />

person he dealeth with‖. 206<br />

200 <strong>The</strong> Privy Council to Alderman Saltsonstall, 15 March 1595, TNA, SP 12/251/58.<br />

201 Thomas Ferrers to <strong>Cecil</strong>, 15 April 1595, TNA, SP 12/251/10.<br />

202 <strong>Cecil</strong> to Thomas Ferrers, 18 April 1595 in R. A. Roberts (ed.) CMS, Vol. 5: 1591-1595, London, 1894, p.<br />

177.<br />

203 Protest <strong>of</strong> Rol<strong>of</strong>f Peterson, 30 September 1595, SP 82/4 f.5r.<br />

204 Protest <strong>of</strong> Thomas Ferrers, October 1595, TNA, SP 12/254/46.<br />

205 Ibid.<br />

206 Ibid.<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!