24.10.2012 Views

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

late seventeenth and early eighteenth century attitude towards ‗irrational‘ concepts such as<br />

alchemy and astrology is particularly evident in his writing. Strype, writing at the height <strong>of</strong><br />

the scientific revolution‘s emphasis on rationality and reason, usually found it easiest to<br />

overlook <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s interest in alchemy.<br />

When alchemical patronage came to the forefront <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s correspondence,<br />

Strype conveniently ascribed some other motive to his actions. This is evident in his<br />

discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s correspondence with the alchemist Edward Kelley. Strype decided<br />

that ―the curiosity <strong>of</strong> the subject, and eminency <strong>of</strong> the person [<strong>Cecil</strong>]‖ warranted the<br />

printing <strong>of</strong> large sections <strong>of</strong> the letters both in his text and appendix. 3 On rather slim<br />

evidence he presumed that <strong>Cecil</strong> sought Kelley primarily as a political informant rather than<br />

for his purported alchemical skills. 4 This supposition has strongly influenced almost all<br />

subsequent historians‘ interpretations <strong>of</strong> this episode. 5<br />

Strype <strong>of</strong>ten included original documents in appendices. Whilst this has preserved<br />

some letters that have since been destroyed, his documentary selections reflected his<br />

personal prejudices, and their accessibility has since shaped the interests and perspectives<br />

<strong>of</strong> historians. 6 As a clergyman he emphasised <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s religious policy, and almost totally<br />

ignored many other topics. Too many historians have relied on his usually accurate,<br />

although <strong>of</strong>ten silently abridged, transcriptions <strong>of</strong> difficult to access manuscripts, making<br />

Strype‘s particular biases incredibly pervasive, even three centuries later. Historians as<br />

eminent as David Quinn, in his biography <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sir</strong> Humphrey Gilbert, have repeated ad<br />

nauseam Strype‘s treatment <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s alchemical projects, the Society <strong>of</strong> the New<br />

Art. 7<br />

3 John Strype, Annals <strong>of</strong> the Reformation and Establishment <strong>of</strong> Religion and other Various Occurrences in the Church <strong>of</strong><br />

England During Queen Elizabeth’s Happy Reign, , Vol. 3, Part 2, Oxford, 1728, reprinted 1824, p. 132.<br />

4 Ibid., pp. 132-33.<br />

5 Edward Nares, Memoirs <strong>of</strong> the Life and Administration <strong>of</strong> the Right Honourable <strong>William</strong> <strong>Cecil</strong>, <strong>Lord</strong> <strong>Burghley</strong>, London,<br />

1828, p. 340; Michael Wilding, ‗A Biography <strong>of</strong> Edward Kelly, the English Alchemist and Associate <strong>of</strong> Dr.<br />

John Dee‘, in Stanton J. Linden, Mystical Metal <strong>of</strong> Gold: Essays on Alchemy and Renaissance Culture, New York,<br />

2007, pp. 61-62.<br />

6 Martin and McConnell, ‗Strype, John (1643–1737)‘.<br />

7 David B. Quinn, <strong>The</strong> Voyages and Colonising Enterprises <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sir</strong> Humphrey Gilbert, London, 1940.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!