24.10.2012 Views

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

The Alchemical Patronage of Sir William Cecil, Lord Burghley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

love and honor vertue and knolledge‖. 139 Perhaps <strong>Cecil</strong> knew that Dyer‘s presence was<br />

raising doubts in Prague about Kelley‘s loyalty to the Emperor. Regardless, <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s<br />

previous consultation with Paracelsian physicians such as Russwurin suggests his medical<br />

appeal was not entirely disingenuous, for whilst the<br />

moste dyrect cause [<strong>of</strong> his illness] is oppression with affaires, and lacke <strong>of</strong><br />

liberty, against the which no medicinall receipt can serve... yett I wilbe glad<br />

to make much <strong>of</strong> any that you shall send me, with your assurance that it<br />

shall do me no harme 140<br />

That the astute <strong>Cecil</strong> would trust the tinctures <strong>of</strong> a man so <strong>of</strong>ten derided by historians as<br />

the archetypal alchemical charlatan, is indicative <strong>of</strong> both his belief in alchemical medicine<br />

and the reputation Kelley enjoyed in England.<br />

A letter to Dyer, drafted on 12 May in <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s own spindly hand, provides the most<br />

compelling evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s genuine belief in Edward Kelley‘s alchemical abilities. Sent<br />

by secure courier to his long time acquaintance, <strong>Cecil</strong> did not have to be concerned about<br />

<strong>of</strong>fending the alchemist‘s ego, and could give a truer account <strong>of</strong> his actual opinion on the<br />

matter. <strong>The</strong> authenticity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s desire for the rogue alchemist to return to England is<br />

evident. Convinced by Dyer‘s ―stedfast first opinion <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sir</strong> Edward Kelly, namely as you<br />

write for that worthy truth in him at that highest poynt that hath bene before by you<br />

reported‖, <strong>Cecil</strong> instructed Dyer to convince Kelley to ―retorn to his natyve contry, to<br />

honor hir majesty as a loyal natural subject with the fruits <strong>of</strong> such great knolledg as God<br />

hath gyven hym‖. 141 He once again emphasised that the ―Quene is, <strong>of</strong> hir very divine<br />

nature most redy to reward yea to honor knolledge in any person‖, which would equal<br />

anything given to Kelley by foreign princes. 142<br />

<strong>Cecil</strong> maintained that those in England who wrote against Kelley would either be<br />

persuaded by a demonstration <strong>of</strong> Kelley‘s transmutation, or were enemies <strong>of</strong> the Crown,<br />

attempting to keep the alchemical benefits out <strong>of</strong> the Queen‘s hands. However, <strong>Cecil</strong>‘s<br />

139 <strong>Cecil</strong> to Kelley, Lansdowne Vol.103, No. 72.<br />

140 Ibid.<br />

141 <strong>Cecil</strong> to Edward Dyer, 12 May 1591, BL, Cotton Titus B. II, no. 110.<br />

142 Ibid.<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!