04.10.2013 Views

SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History

SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History

SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF <strong>SPHENOPHRYNE</strong><br />

91<br />

CALL: Menzies (1976: 61) described the<br />

call as ‘‘a long rattling chuckle lasting about<br />

one second and so loud that it can be heard<br />

from several hundred metres distance.’’ I<br />

heard this call near Tabubil but was unable<br />

to record it. However, a recording by Ian<br />

Redmond made available through the courtesy<br />

<strong>of</strong> Mr. Redmond and the British Library<br />

<strong>of</strong> Wildlife Sounds is available for analysis<br />

(fig. 76B). The calls (N 4 from one individual,<br />

BMNH 1980.673) are 1.9–3.1 sec in<br />

length (mean 2.4) and consist <strong>of</strong> 42–67 notes<br />

(mean 52.2), each note comprised <strong>of</strong> 2 or 3<br />

(rarely 4) discrete pulses. There is a dominant<br />

frequency at 3000 Hz and a slightly<br />

lesser peak at 1200 Hz. The note repetition<br />

rate is 21.6–23.0 notes per second (mean<br />

22.1), with no obvious change in rate over<br />

the course <strong>of</strong> a call. Temperature was not<br />

noted.<br />

In addition to the call described above, the<br />

species also has another that is possibly territorial<br />

in function. This call includes one to<br />

three brief (0.03–0.05 sec) pulsed notes with<br />

several emphasized harmonics. Single- and<br />

double-note calls are in the majority; triplenote<br />

calls are infrequent. Single or initial<br />

notes are more rapidly pulsed than second or<br />

third notes and include a more nearly complete<br />

set <strong>of</strong> harmonics (fig. 76A). In one recorded<br />

instance, a frog called 18 times in the<br />

space <strong>of</strong> 3 min 49 sec (average, once every<br />

12.7 sec). Many <strong>of</strong> these calls (10 <strong>of</strong> 19) appeared<br />

to elicit responses from, or were in<br />

response to, similar calls from an individual<br />

nearby.<br />

COMPARISONS WITH OTHER SPECIES: Sphenophryne<br />

cornuta is that rare creature, a Papuan<br />

microhylid that readily can be identified<br />

to genus and species without resorting to dissection<br />

or call analysis. No other species<br />

shares its combination <strong>of</strong> a small dermal appendage<br />

on the eyelid, fingers with enlarged<br />

discs larger than those on the toes, and vertical<br />

loreal region. Scansorial species <strong>of</strong> Cophixalus<br />

and Oreophryne may be similar in<br />

size and general morphology, but none has<br />

the eyelid appendage.<br />

HABITAT AND HABITS: Myfield experience<br />

with this species is limited to two areas—the<br />

Adelbert Mountains in coastal Madang Province,<br />

and the vicinity <strong>of</strong> Tabubil, Western<br />

Province. At an elevation <strong>of</strong> 670 m in the<br />

former region, I found individuals at night at<br />

heights <strong>of</strong> less than 2 m on vegetation beside<br />

a stream in rainforest regrowth. They shared<br />

this habit and habitat with two other microhylids<br />

<strong>of</strong> similar size, Cophixalus biroi<br />

(Méhely¨) and C. cheesmanae Parker. These<br />

two were calling, whereas I heard no calls<br />

from cornuta. Near Tabubil, frogs gave possibly<br />

territorial calls (see above) from perches<br />

1–2 m up in shrubs, saplings, or tangled<br />

vegetation not close to any running water.<br />

Menzies (1976: 60–61) remarked that<br />

‘‘calling males seem to be well spaced out<br />

for I have never found, or heard, two close<br />

together,’’ and added that cornuta ‘‘is probably<br />

as much terrestrial as scansorial although<br />

males, at least, do climb about on low<br />

vegetation.’’ I find nothing else in the literature<br />

on the ecology <strong>of</strong> this species.<br />

DISTRIBUTION: On the north coast <strong>of</strong> New<br />

Guinea, Sphenophryne cornuta has been<br />

found at low to moderate elevations from<br />

near the tip <strong>of</strong> the Vogelkop Peninsula eastward<br />

to the Adelbert Mountains north <strong>of</strong> Madang.<br />

Records on the south coast extend<br />

from the Bomberi Peninsula in Irian Jaya<br />

eastward to slightly east <strong>of</strong> Port Moresby<br />

(fig. 48). Spotty but fairly intensive collecting<br />

on the Huon Peninsula and eastward on<br />

the north coast has produced no cornuta. Elevations<br />

<strong>of</strong> collection range from virtually<br />

sea level, as at Kerema and Katau, to 2600<br />

m in the Hellwig Mountains <strong>of</strong> Irian Jaya,<br />

though most localities lie between about 400<br />

and 1250 m. There are no insular records.<br />

LOCALITY RECORDS AND SPECIMENS EXAM-<br />

INED: IRIAN JAYA: Bomberi (BPBM 5290);<br />

Camp VI, Utakwa River (BMNH 1913.<br />

11.1.139); foot <strong>of</strong> Charles Lewis Mtns.<br />

(BMNH 1897.3.23.5); Geitenkamp, Lorentz<br />

River (ZMA 5777, syntype <strong>of</strong> Chaperina<br />

ceratophthalmus); Hellwig Mtns., 2600 m<br />

(ZMA, unnumbered); Heuvelbivak, 800 m,<br />

Lorentz River (ZMA, unnumbered); Mt. Kohari,<br />

between Modder-lust and Kasawari<br />

(MCZ A7611); Launch Camp, Setekwa River<br />

(BMNH 1913.11.1.136–138); near the Wa<br />

Samson River, about 20 km ENE Sorong<br />

(MSNG 29479, holotype); Peramelesbivak,<br />

Lorentz River (ZMA unnumbered); Resi<br />

Peak, Lorentz River (ZMA 5778, 5779, syntypes<br />

<strong>of</strong> Chaperina ceratophthalmus); Sabang,<br />

Lorentz River (ZMA, unnumbered);

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!