SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History
SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History
88 BULLETIN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 253 Fig. 46. Comparison of relative eye size and tibia length in Oxydactyla stenodactyla from Mt. Wilhelm (circles) and O. alpestris (squares) from the Porol Ranges. Adult individuals only plotted; symbols enclosing dots represent two specimens with identical ratios. other. See Holotype and Paratypes for localities and specimens examined. REMARKS: It is evident from the description of variation that frogs from at least the three principal population samples (excluding Mt. Kerigomna, with only two specimens available) are quite distinctive in color pattern. A large majority could be assigned correctly geographically on the basis of color pattern alone. One could argue not unreasonably for separate specific (or at least subspecific) status for each population. I regard the morphological similarity (other than color pattern) of the three populations as compelling evidence for conspecific status, although I would welcome the opportunity to test this hypothesis against information from advertisement calls. Naming the known populations as subspecies would, in my opinion, serve no particularly useful service, because knowledge of the variation and distribution of the species most likely is far from complete. P. J. Darlington, who climbed Mt. Wilhelm during World War II, was the first to collect this species. Loveridge (1948) referred the specimens to Sphenophryne brevicrus, a name that as used in the past included four species by my present reckoning. Genus Sphenophryne Peters and Doria Cornufer Tschudi, 1838: 28, 71, part; see Zweifel (1967b) for disposition of this name. Sphenophryne Peters and Doria, 1878: 430. Type species (by monotypy), Sphenophryne cornuta Peters and Doria, 1878: 430. DIAGNOSIS: A genus of genyophrynine microhylid frogs (sensu Zweifel, 1971 and Burton, 1986) with the following combination of morphological characters: clavicles long and slender, reaching from scapula almost to midline of pectoral girdle; frontoparietal region of skull short and wide, mean ratio of braincase to skull length, 0.56; diapophyses of sacral vertebra broadly expanded, mean ratio of anterior-posterior distance to lateral span, 0.47 (table 14); first finger short, less than half length of second; tips of fingers (except 1st) and toes broadened into flattened discs with terminal grooves, disc on third finger broader than that on fourth toe; terminal phalanges with the tip broadly Tshaped, span of tip of phalanx of third finger averages 2 width of base of phalanx. CONTENT: The genus is monotypic. MORPHOLOGY: See species account. DISTRIBUTION: See species account. REMARKS: Superficially, Sphenophryne may be distinguished from other genyophrynine genera by the presence of a small dermal appendage on each eyelid. Proportions of the skull and sacral vertebra set it apart from the other genera with the primitive pectoral girdle, as do the short first finger and the relative sizes of finger and toe discs. Sphenophryne cornuta Peters and Doria Figures 31A, 47 Cornufer unicolor Tschudi, 1838: 28, 71, part (based on two specimens, only one of which is S. cornuta; see Zweifel, 1967b). Sphenophryne cornuta Peters and Doria, 1878: 430 (type locality, ‘‘presso il fiume Wa Samson nella Nuovo Guinea settentrionale’’ [‘‘near the Wa Samson River in northern New Guinea’’; this river is on the northwestern edge of the Vogelkop Peninsula, Irian Jaya, Indonesia, with its mouth about 20 km east-northeast of Sorong]; holotype, MSNG 29479, collected by O. Beccari in 1875).
2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPHRYNE 89 Fig. 47. Sphenophryne cornuta, AMNH A83051, SVL 38.5 mm. Chaperina ceratophthalmus van Kampen, 1909: 43 (type localities, ‘‘Noord-Fluss bei Geitenkamp’’ [Geitenkamp, Lorentz River] and ‘‘Resi-Gipfel’’ [Resi Peak], Irian Jaya, Indonesia; syntypes, ZMA 5777 [Geitenkamp], collected by H. A. Lorentz, July 2, 1907, and ZMA 5778, 5779 [Resi Peak], collected by Lorentz on August 20 and September 9, 1907). TYPE MATERIAL: The holotype is a small individual (SVL 21.8 mm), presumably immature (not sexed), in ‘‘Discrete condizioni’’ (fairly good condition: Capocaccia, 1957: 220). In all pertinent characters it agrees with the following composite description. DIAGNOSIS: The presence of a small but distinct, pointed tubercle on each eyelid distinguishes this species from all other Papuan microhylids. (The large-mouthed, squat Asterophrys turpicola has elongate warts on the eyelids, but not a single slender tubercle.) Equally distinctive are the combination of flat, vertical loreal region and flat upper surface of the snout, and the large finger discs, that of the third finger being broader than that of the fourth toe. MORPHOLOGY: Males and females mature at about 29 mm SVL. Among 106 specimens measured, the largest male measures 37.4 mm and the largest individual, probably a female, 41.4 mm. The largest specimen whose sex was determined, a female, measured 40.0 mm. Head and body relatively slender, HW/ SVL about 0.35 in adults. Snout subacutely pointed as seen from above; nostrils lateral, much closer to tip of snout than to eye; loreal region vertical and flat, distinctly set off from flat upper surface of snout. Internarial distance relatively broad (mean IN/SVL, 0.12), eye–naris distance usually slightly less than eye diameter, rarely a little greater. Eyes moderate, laterally oriented, EY/SVL about 0.11 in adults, eyelid with a small but distinct pointed tubercle near its free margin. Tympanum distinct, horizontal diameter about 63% that of the eye, no sexual dimorphism. Hind legs relatively long, TL/SVL average about 0.49 in adults. Relative lengths of fingers 3 4 2 1, first quite short; terminal disc of first finger scarcely if at all expanded, without a distinct groove, discs of other fingers well developed with terminal grooves, disc of third finger averages 2.3 width of penultimate phalanx (fig. 52). Relative lengths of toes 4 3 5 2 1, all with grooved terminal discs, that of fourth toe about 1.7 width of penultimate phalanx and about 82 % of width of third finger disc. Fingers and toes with low, rounded subarticular areas; no palmar or plantar elevations evident. Toes free or with sparse basal webbing (fig. 52). Body generally smooth above and below, but with rows of widely spaced tubercles on dorsal and ventral surfaces; similar tubercles on dorsal surfaces of hind limbs; usually a tubercle on heel and others along outer edge of tarsus. COLOR AND PATTERN: Preserved specimens are brown or gray-brown above, virtually patternless or with rather indistinct markings. Variations include a darker central figure (fig. 47), a pale vertebral hairline, and faint lighter spots. Tubercles are typically light-tipped. The dorsal surface of the thigh usually has a
- Page 37 and 38: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 39 and 40: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 41 and 42: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 43 and 44: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 45 and 46: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 47 and 48: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 49 and 50: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 51 and 52: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 53 and 54: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 55 and 56: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 57 and 58: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 59 and 60: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 61 and 62: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 63 and 64: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 65 and 66: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 67 and 68: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 69 and 70: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 71 and 72: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 73 and 74: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 75 and 76: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 77 and 78: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 79 and 80: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 81 and 82: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 83 and 84: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 85 and 86: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 87: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 91 and 92: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 93 and 94: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 95 and 96: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 97 and 98: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 99 and 100: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 101 and 102: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 103 and 104: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 105 and 106: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 107 and 108: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 109 and 110: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 111 and 112: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 113 and 114: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 115 and 116: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 117 and 118: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 119 and 120: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 121 and 122: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 123 and 124: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 125 and 126: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 127 and 128: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
- Page 129 and 130: 2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPH
2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF <strong>SPHENOPHRYNE</strong><br />
89<br />
Fig. 47. Sphenophryne cornuta, AMNH<br />
A83051, SVL 38.5 mm.<br />
Chaperina ceratophthalmus van Kampen, 1909:<br />
43 (type localities, ‘‘Noord-Fluss bei Geitenkamp’’<br />
[Geitenkamp, Lorentz River] and<br />
‘‘Resi-Gipfel’’ [Resi Peak], Irian Jaya, Indonesia;<br />
syntypes, ZMA 5777 [Geitenkamp], collected<br />
by H. A. Lorentz, July 2, 1907, and ZMA<br />
5778, 5779 [Resi Peak], collected by Lorentz<br />
on August 20 and September 9, 1907).<br />
TYPE MATERIAL: The holotype is a small<br />
individual (SVL 21.8 mm), presumably immature<br />
(not sexed), in ‘‘Discrete condizioni’’<br />
(fairly good condition: Capocaccia, 1957:<br />
220). In all pertinent characters it agrees with<br />
the following composite description.<br />
DIAGNOSIS: The presence <strong>of</strong> a small but<br />
distinct, pointed tubercle on each eyelid distinguishes<br />
this species from all other Papuan<br />
microhylids. (The large-mouthed, squat Asterophrys<br />
turpicola has elongate warts on the<br />
eyelids, but not a single slender tubercle.)<br />
Equally distinctive are the combination <strong>of</strong><br />
flat, vertical loreal region and flat upper surface<br />
<strong>of</strong> the snout, and the large finger discs,<br />
that <strong>of</strong> the third finger being broader than<br />
that <strong>of</strong> the fourth toe.<br />
MORPHOLOGY: Males and females mature<br />
at about 29 mm SVL. Among 106 specimens<br />
measured, the largest male measures 37.4<br />
mm and the largest individual, probably a female,<br />
41.4 mm. The largest specimen whose<br />
sex was determined, a female, measured 40.0<br />
mm. Head and body relatively slender, HW/<br />
SVL about 0.35 in adults. Snout subacutely<br />
pointed as seen from above; nostrils lateral,<br />
much closer to tip <strong>of</strong> snout than to eye; loreal<br />
region vertical and flat, distinctly set <strong>of</strong>f from<br />
flat upper surface <strong>of</strong> snout. Internarial distance<br />
relatively broad (mean IN/SVL, 0.12),<br />
eye–naris distance usually slightly less than<br />
eye diameter, rarely a little greater. Eyes<br />
moderate, laterally oriented, EY/SVL about<br />
0.11 in adults, eyelid with a small but distinct<br />
pointed tubercle near its free margin. Tympanum<br />
distinct, horizontal diameter about<br />
63% that <strong>of</strong> the eye, no sexual dimorphism.<br />
Hind legs relatively long, TL/SVL average<br />
about 0.49 in adults. Relative lengths <strong>of</strong> fingers<br />
3 4 2 1, first quite short; terminal<br />
disc <strong>of</strong> first finger scarcely if at all expanded,<br />
without a distinct groove, discs <strong>of</strong> other fingers<br />
well developed with terminal grooves,<br />
disc <strong>of</strong> third finger averages 2.3 width <strong>of</strong><br />
penultimate phalanx (fig. 52). Relative<br />
lengths <strong>of</strong> toes 4 3 5 2 1, all with<br />
grooved terminal discs, that <strong>of</strong> fourth toe<br />
about 1.7 width <strong>of</strong> penultimate phalanx and<br />
about 82 % <strong>of</strong> width <strong>of</strong> third finger disc. Fingers<br />
and toes with low, rounded subarticular<br />
areas; no palmar or plantar elevations evident.<br />
Toes free or with sparse basal webbing<br />
(fig. 52). Body generally smooth above and<br />
below, but with rows <strong>of</strong> widely spaced tubercles<br />
on dorsal and ventral surfaces; similar<br />
tubercles on dorsal surfaces <strong>of</strong> hind limbs;<br />
usually a tubercle on heel and others along<br />
outer edge <strong>of</strong> tarsus.<br />
COLOR AND PATTERN: Preserved specimens<br />
are brown or gray-brown above, virtually<br />
patternless or with rather indistinct markings.<br />
Variations include a darker central figure (fig.<br />
47), a pale vertebral hairline, and faint lighter<br />
spots. Tubercles are typically light-tipped.<br />
The dorsal surface <strong>of</strong> the thigh usually has a