04.10.2013 Views

SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History

SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History

SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF <strong>SPHENOPHRYNE</strong><br />

61<br />

have a dark-edged, narrow, pale, midvertebral<br />

line imposed on the more basic pattern<br />

described. Five specimens have a dark figure<br />

that involves the top <strong>of</strong> the head and snout,<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the eyelids, and occupies the middorsal<br />

region, where its irregular but well-defined<br />

edges set it <strong>of</strong>f abruptly from the paler<br />

dorsolateral region. Both polymorphism and<br />

individual color change (arrested by preservation)<br />

may be involved.<br />

ILLUSTRATIONS: 3rd finger terminal phalanx,<br />

fig. 71F; premaxilla, fig. 63E; hyoid,<br />

fig. 70; sacral region, fig. 72E; vomer, fig.<br />

65E; skull, fig. 68C; hand and foot, fig. 54B.<br />

CALL: An average call is a train <strong>of</strong> about<br />

23 short (0.03 sec) notes uttered at 15 per<br />

sec over a period <strong>of</strong> 1.5 sec (fig. 78A, table<br />

8). Individual notes are unpulsed, with an<br />

abrupt rise in frequency and a less abrupt<br />

fall, with the dominant energy occurring in<br />

the region <strong>of</strong> 2600–2900 Hz. One individual<br />

initiated calls at an average interval <strong>of</strong> 46.8<br />

sec (35.9–58.9, N 7), another at 35.5 sec<br />

(26.7–51.8, N 4). Temperature was virtually<br />

the same in both instances (16.4 and<br />

16.5C, respectively). There is no indication<br />

<strong>of</strong> an influence <strong>of</strong> temperature on call characteristics,<br />

but the temperature range in the<br />

sample is narrow (3.2C).<br />

COMPARISONS WITH OTHER SPECIES: Details<br />

in the Diagnosis should suffice to separate<br />

allisoni from other Liophryne. The more<br />

prominent subarticular elevations <strong>of</strong> allisoni<br />

and its high TL/SVL ratio will distinguish it<br />

from Austrochaperina <strong>of</strong> similar size.<br />

HABITAT AND HABITS: Gressitt and Nadkarni’s<br />

(1978) description <strong>of</strong> the vegetation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Mt. Kaindi is illustrated with cross sec-<br />

tions <strong>of</strong> forest at 1790 and 1880 m, within<br />

the zone occupied by Liophryne allisoni. The<br />

forest, on a steep ground with a ground cover<br />

<strong>of</strong> leaves, moss and ferns, has an irregular<br />

canopy 27–29 m high. Brass (1964: 201)<br />

characterized the forest at Arau as ‘‘a transition<br />

between mid-mountain fagaceous forest<br />

and a lower montane mixed rain forest<br />

. . . rich in herbaceous undergrowth.’’<br />

I found the holotype in the daytime beneath<br />

a small log. Frogs tape-recorded by Allen<br />

Allison were beneath leaves on the forest<br />

floor, and one that I recorded (but that eluded<br />

four surrounding herpetologists) was deep in<br />

roadside grass. The habitus <strong>of</strong> this species—<br />

especially the long legs and large eyes—suggest<br />

that it is more a frog <strong>of</strong> the leaf litter<br />

rather than a truly burrowing form. This is<br />

consistent with what is known <strong>of</strong> other Liophryne.<br />

DISTRIBUTION: Liophryne allisoni is<br />

known from localities in Papua New Guinea<br />

spanning 150 km between the eastern edge<br />

<strong>of</strong> Eastern Highlands Province and the vicinity<br />

<strong>of</strong> Wau, Morobe Province (fig. 28).<br />

The known range in elevation is 1400–2000<br />

m. The upper limit, at least, may be approximately<br />

correct, as this frog has not been<br />

taken in the summit region <strong>of</strong> Mt. Kaindi<br />

(2362 m) despite much collecting there. For<br />

locality data, see Holotype and Paratypes<br />

above.<br />

REMARKS: Members <strong>of</strong> the Sixth Archbold<br />

Expedition (1959) were the first to collect<br />

this species. The majority <strong>of</strong> specimens and<br />

tape recordings resulted from the efforts <strong>of</strong><br />

Allen Allison, working out <strong>of</strong> the Wau Ecology<br />

Institute.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!