SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History

SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History

digitallibrary.amnh.org
from digitallibrary.amnh.org More from this publisher
04.10.2013 Views

30 BULLETIN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 253 Fig. 14. Comparison of tibia lengths in Austrochaperina derongo (circles) and A. rivularis (squares) from Southern Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea. For regression data, see table 3. size range. Mature females may be as small as 31 mm SVL, but others as large as 35 mm have ova only slightly enlarged. In the series of 19 specimens from Irian Jaya there are five gravid females in the range of 33.0–35.4 mm SVL, whereas a 28- mm specimen is immature. Five males 29.0 to 34.8 mm have vocal slits, and a 26.7-mm specimen does not. The specimens from Southern Highlands Province include six adult females 29.5 to 35.6 mm SV and one apparently maturing at 27.8 mm. Five males 25.6 to 32.6 mm have vocal slits. The four largest females (SVL 44.7–49.7 mm) are all from one locality, Gigabip in Western Province. Thus, there appears to be geographic variation in size at maturity and in maximum size. Differences in proportions as well as in size are evident among the widely scattered samples of derongo (table 2). Regression data are in table 3. Variations from the color pattern described for the holotype include: dorsum largely without dark speckles; no postocular pale band; chin and chest darker than abdomen; tip of snout pale, almost white, in both sexes. In life, the individual illustrated from Soliabedo (fig. 12) was light olive-drab dorsally and somewhat yellower bordering the abdo- Fig. 15. Comparison of eye diameters in Austrochaperina derongo (circles) and A. rivularis (squares) from Southern Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea. For regression data, see table 3. men. The iris was similar to the dorsal ground color (as seen in a color transparency). A specimen from Derongo (color transparency) was reddish brown dorsally with darker markings, the border of the abdomen creamy white, and the iris brownish gold. Color transparencies of two specimens from Irian Jaya show a light gray ground color in one, a darker gray in the other. Each has a darker scapular mark, and the darker individual has the eyelids and anterior of the head darker gray (fig. 31H). Most males (and some females) have the tip of the snout much paler than the rest of the head. ILLUSTRATIONS: 3rd finger terminal phalanx, fig. 71Q; 3rd finger disc, fig. 50; premaxilla, fig. 64H; sacral region, fig. 73D; vomer, fig. 65L; hand and foot, fig. 55B. CALL: Stephen Richards recorded the call of this species at Wapoga Alpha Camp in Irian Jaya on April 9, 1998. The call is a series of brief, harsh, pulsed notes (table 5). Mr. Richards estimates that his recording lacks the first three notes of the call, so by extrapolation the complete call would have lasted about 13 sec and comprised of about 24 notes. Five notes average 0.075 sec in length (0.070– 0.077) with an average of 13 pulses (12–15).

2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF SPHENOPHRYNE 31 Fig. 16. Comparison of third finger disc widths in Austrochaperina derongo (circles) and A. rivularis (squares) from Southern Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea. For regression data, see table 3. A typical note (fig. 80A) begins with three brief pulses followed by several longer, louder ones gradually diminishing in duration and intensity. The note repetition rate is about 1.9/ sec, the dominant frequency being 2650 Hz (see also Vocalizations). The frog called from beneath a leaf in a creekbed adjacent to a small stream beside a trickle of water (S. Richards, personal commun.). The voucher specimen is QM J67250; a copy of the recording is on AMNH Herpetology tape no. 284. A call by another specimen (MZB 3564) recorded at the same locality sounds the same but is masked by the noise of running water. COMPARISONS WITH OTHER SPECIES: Austrochaperina derongo is much like archboldi, hooglandi, and guttata; only the last, with its large size, large finger discs, and long legs (table 2) stands out much from derongo. Color pattern adequately distinguishes hooglandi, and most archboldi can be separated by their greater internarial span and larger eyes. HABITAT AND HABITS: The association of a calling individual with water (see above) and the capture of other specimens in the same habitat (S. Richards, personal commun.) represent the only information on the habits and habitat of this species. Most of the localities in Papua New Guinea fall in areas mapped by Paijmans (1975) as ‘‘Medium Crowned Lowland Hill Forest.’’ The two highest sites (Wangbin, 1460 m; Mt. Bosavi, 1200 m) are within Lower Montane Forest zones. Archbold et al. (1942) described the region where the Irian Jaya specimens were taken as heavily mossed rainforest. DISTRIBUTION: Most locality records for A. derongo are at moderate to low elevations along the southern flank of the central dividing range from just east of the Irian Jaya– Papua New Guinea border to the Purari River drainage in Gulf and Simbu provinces; the Irian Jaya localities are north of the central ranges and nearly 200 km from the closest station in Papua New Guinea (fig. 13). The elevation range is 80–1460 m. REMARKS: If I am correct in associating ‘‘Sphenophryne sp. B’’ of Mahony et al. (1992) with derongo (see Karyology), then this species is unique among the few Austrochaperina for which there are data in having the chromosome number 2N of 24 rather than 26. There is one known instance of sympatry between A. derongo and A. rivularis based on specimens collected by S. Donnellan at Namosado, Southern Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea. Two adult male A. rivularis (AMS R122164, R122165) taken along with ten A. derongo (AMS R122166– 122169, R122232, R122235–122239) stand out for their relatively large size: one (SVL 37.7 mm) is larger than any of the 10 derongo (maximum is a 35.6 mm female) and the other, at 35.5 mm, is at the upper range of that series. In all proportions in which derongo and rivularis differ, the two large males resemble rivularis rather than derongo. Figures 14–16 illustrate the greater tibia length, eye size, and disc width of rivularis at the site of sympatry. Variations in size and proportions among the geographically scattered samples of this species lead me to suspect that derongo may be a composite of two or more species. However, I am unable to subdivide the species to my satisfaction. More recordings of calls might resolve the question; the only recording at present is from the most remote part of the range.

2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF <strong>SPHENOPHRYNE</strong><br />

31<br />

Fig. 16. Comparison <strong>of</strong> third finger disc<br />

widths in Austrochaperina derongo (circles) and<br />

A. rivularis (squares) from Southern Highlands<br />

Province, Papua New Guinea. For regression data,<br />

see table 3.<br />

A typical note (fig. 80A) begins with three<br />

brief pulses followed by several longer, louder<br />

ones gradually diminishing in duration and intensity.<br />

The note repetition rate is about 1.9/<br />

sec, the dominant frequency being 2650 Hz<br />

(see also Vocalizations).<br />

The frog called from beneath a leaf in a<br />

creekbed adjacent to a small stream beside a<br />

trickle <strong>of</strong> water (S. Richards, personal commun.).<br />

The voucher specimen is QM J67250;<br />

a copy <strong>of</strong> the recording is on AMNH Herpetology<br />

tape no. 284. A call by another<br />

specimen (MZB 3564) recorded at the same<br />

locality sounds the same but is masked by<br />

the noise <strong>of</strong> running water.<br />

COMPARISONS WITH OTHER SPECIES: Austrochaperina<br />

derongo is much like archboldi,<br />

hooglandi, and guttata; only the last, with its<br />

large size, large finger discs, and long legs<br />

(table 2) stands out much from derongo. Color<br />

pattern adequately distinguishes hooglandi,<br />

and most archboldi can be separated by<br />

their greater internarial span and larger eyes.<br />

HABITAT AND HABITS: The association <strong>of</strong> a<br />

calling individual with water (see above) and<br />

the capture <strong>of</strong> other specimens in the same<br />

habitat (S. Richards, personal commun.) represent<br />

the only information on the habits and<br />

habitat <strong>of</strong> this species. Most <strong>of</strong> the localities<br />

in Papua New Guinea fall in areas mapped<br />

by Paijmans (1975) as ‘‘Medium Crowned<br />

Lowland Hill Forest.’’ The two highest sites<br />

(Wangbin, 1460 m; Mt. Bosavi, 1200 m) are<br />

within Lower Montane Forest zones. Archbold<br />

et al. (1942) described the region where<br />

the Irian Jaya specimens were taken as heavily<br />

mossed rainforest.<br />

DISTRIBUTION: Most locality records for A.<br />

derongo are at moderate to low elevations<br />

along the southern flank <strong>of</strong> the central dividing<br />

range from just east <strong>of</strong> the Irian Jaya–<br />

Papua New Guinea border to the Purari River<br />

drainage in Gulf and Simbu provinces; the<br />

Irian Jaya localities are north <strong>of</strong> the central<br />

ranges and nearly 200 km from the closest<br />

station in Papua New Guinea (fig. 13). The<br />

elevation range is 80–1460 m.<br />

REMARKS: If I am correct in associating<br />

‘‘Sphenophryne sp. B’’ <strong>of</strong> Mahony et al.<br />

(1992) with derongo (see Karyology), then<br />

this species is unique among the few Austrochaperina<br />

for which there are data in having<br />

the chromosome number 2N <strong>of</strong> 24 rather<br />

than 26.<br />

There is one known instance <strong>of</strong> sympatry<br />

between A. derongo and A. rivularis based<br />

on specimens collected by S. Donnellan at<br />

Namosado, Southern Highlands Province,<br />

Papua New Guinea. Two adult male A. rivularis<br />

(AMS R122164, R122165) taken<br />

along with ten A. derongo (AMS R122166–<br />

122169, R122232, R122235–122239) stand<br />

out for their relatively large size: one (SVL<br />

37.7 mm) is larger than any <strong>of</strong> the 10 derongo<br />

(maximum is a 35.6 mm female) and the<br />

other, at 35.5 mm, is at the upper range <strong>of</strong><br />

that series. In all proportions in which derongo<br />

and rivularis differ, the two large<br />

males resemble rivularis rather than derongo.<br />

Figures 14–16 illustrate the greater tibia<br />

length, eye size, and disc width <strong>of</strong> rivularis<br />

at the site <strong>of</strong> sympatry.<br />

Variations in size and proportions among<br />

the geographically scattered samples <strong>of</strong> this<br />

species lead me to suspect that derongo may<br />

be a composite <strong>of</strong> two or more species. However,<br />

I am unable to subdivide the species to<br />

my satisfaction. More recordings <strong>of</strong> calls<br />

might resolve the question; the only recording<br />

at present is from the most remote part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the range.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!