SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History
SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History
SPHENOPHRYNE - American Museum of Natural History
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2000 ZWEIFEL: PARTITION OF <strong>SPHENOPHRYNE</strong><br />
113<br />
Fig. 71. Terminal phalanges <strong>of</strong> third fingers <strong>of</strong> Austrochaperina, Liophryne, Oxydactyla and Sphenophryne;<br />
scale lines marked in 0.1-mm intervals. A. O. stenodactyla, AMNH A92801. B. O. alpestris,<br />
AMNH A65299. C. O. brevicrus, AMNH A43761. D. O. coggeri, AMNH A140874. E. A. brevipes,<br />
AMNH A130527. F. L. allisoni, BPBM 9631. G. L. rhododactyla, BPBM 9793. H. L. dentata, UPNG<br />
2641. I. L. schlaginhaufeni, AMNH A78183. J. A. gracilipes, AMNH A90407. K. A. novaebritanniae,<br />
AMNH A88569. L. A. blumi, UPNG 9559. M. S. cornuta, AMNH A92804. N. A. basipalmata, AMNH<br />
A129495. O. A. rivularis, AMNH A88445. P. A. palmipes, AMNH A92807. Q. A. derongo, AMNH<br />
A145507.<br />
eight small chromosome pairs: Austrochaperina<br />
adelphi, A. fryi, A. gracilipes (J. Menzies,<br />
personal commun.), A. pluvialis, A. palmipes,<br />
A. robusta, and Liophryne rhododactyla.<br />
One Papuan species, Liophryne schlaginhaufeni,<br />
has 2N 30, and another, ‘‘sp.<br />
B’’ <strong>of</strong> Mahony et al., probably A. derongo, 14<br />
14 I have not examined the two specimens cited, AMS<br />
R130754 and R116927 (the latter reported as<br />
‘‘R116297,’’ which is a snake, whereas 116927 is an<br />
Austrochaperina from the locality given), but they were<br />
collected along with a series <strong>of</strong> A. derongo, and the only<br />
other species <strong>of</strong> Austrochaperina in that collection was<br />
the distinctive A. palmipes, which has 2N 26.<br />
has 2N 24. Mahony et al. (1992) demonstrated<br />
that the karyotype <strong>of</strong> schlaginhaufeni<br />
could be derived from a 2N 26 karyotype<br />
by fission, although the recovered karyotype<br />
does not precisely match any <strong>of</strong> those available<br />
for comparison. These authors were<br />
‘‘unable to suggest a simple mechanism for<br />
the diploid number reduction’’ to 2N 24<br />
in ‘‘sp. B.’’<br />
The fact <strong>of</strong> variation in diploid numbers in<br />
this small sample gives hope that data from<br />
additional species may be <strong>of</strong> use in estimating<br />
relationships, but for the present we have<br />
little more than isolated facts.