24.10.2012 Views

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Civil bridges 201<br />

Figure 8.6 Relationship between residual strength <strong>and</strong> initial strength for a given<br />

loss <strong>of</strong> depth <strong>of</strong> a rectangular section.<br />

truss, or the pylon <strong>of</strong> a cable-stayed bridge, assume that the section loss extends<br />

over the entire length. This leads to m=3, because the second moment <strong>of</strong> area,<br />

required in the calculation <strong>of</strong> buckling or compressive strength, will be<br />

approximately proportional to the cube <strong>of</strong> the depth <strong>of</strong> the component.<br />

For a very stocky compression member such as a masonry pier or abutment,<br />

damage will only lead to m=3 if so much <strong>of</strong> the cross section is removed that<br />

the remainder buckles as a slender strut. Otherwise, the order is more likely to<br />

be m=1. The above discussion is illustrated in Figure 8.6, <strong>and</strong> from it we can<br />

form a relationship between strength ratio <strong>and</strong> area ratio, as shown in Figure<br />

8.7. This figure represents the simplest loading <strong>and</strong> the most elementary member<br />

Figure 8.7 Relationship between strength ratio <strong>and</strong> area ratio. Permissible stress<br />

design in the elastic range.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!