A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments
A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments
A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
196<br />
The effects <strong>of</strong> explosive loading<br />
(large) or Ground Slam bomb (22 000 lb). However, the first Tallboy (large)<br />
bomb) was dropped by the UK in operations against the Bielefeld Viaduct, <strong>and</strong><br />
it fell 50 ft away from the piers. The loosening <strong>of</strong> the earth caused the destruction<br />
<strong>of</strong> six piers <strong>and</strong> five arches <strong>of</strong> the viaduct, <strong>and</strong> although the approximate shape<br />
<strong>of</strong> the crater was 150 ft diameter, 45 ft deep, the loosening <strong>of</strong> the soil occurred<br />
over a diameter <strong>of</strong> 240 ft, <strong>and</strong> to a total depth <strong>of</strong> 75 ft. These lessons <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Second World War were perhaps learned again by the forces <strong>of</strong> the west in the<br />
Gulf War against Iraq, when the US was reported to be turning away from the<br />
precision bombing <strong>of</strong> bridges with relatively small bombs to the use <strong>of</strong> very<br />
heavy bombs that could cause destruction from near misses.<br />
Near miss explosions, as we have seen earlier, can cause high blast pressures<br />
on components such as the relatively thin plating <strong>of</strong> the webs <strong>of</strong> deep plate<br />
girders. Damage is then mostly by permanent deformation <strong>and</strong> distortion, <strong>and</strong><br />
removal <strong>of</strong> the integrity <strong>of</strong> web members. In certain circumstances this can lead<br />
to shear failure <strong>and</strong> possible lateral buckling. A final commentary on the damage<br />
<strong>and</strong> repair <strong>of</strong> bridges during the Second World War was provided by<br />
Christopherson [8.3], who briefly examined ways <strong>of</strong> pre-strengthening existing<br />
civil bridges against the possibility <strong>of</strong> bomb damage. He emphasized the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> permeability, ductility <strong>and</strong> redundancy, <strong>and</strong> the need to eliminate<br />
the possibility <strong>of</strong> progressive collapse in viaducts. In general, the results <strong>of</strong> surveys<br />
in the UK <strong>and</strong> US suggested that when it came to bombing from aircraft, it was<br />
better to shake down the piers than shoot up the superstructure. The susceptibility<br />
<strong>of</strong> bridge piers to undermining processes is, <strong>of</strong> course, well known from studies<br />
<strong>of</strong> civil bridge structural failure, where it has been found that about half <strong>of</strong> all<br />
bridge failures is due to scouring under piers <strong>and</strong> abutments.<br />
The explosive damage to bridges from h<strong>and</strong>-placed contact charges is also<br />
an important aspect <strong>of</strong> our review. In 1971, for example, during a local war in<br />
Bangladesh, explosive charge damage was recorded on a number <strong>of</strong> relatively<br />
small reinforced concrete road bridges, <strong>and</strong> on one steel truss bridge. The<br />
damage was <strong>of</strong>ten in the form <strong>of</strong> holes in the deck, sometimes involving the<br />
partial destruction <strong>of</strong> multi-beams supporting the deck slabs, <strong>and</strong> occasionally<br />
this was severe enough to cause the complete collapse <strong>of</strong> a bridge span. Damage<br />
was also reported to reinforced concrete piers, which collapsed sideways, <strong>and</strong><br />
to masonry abutments. The latter suffered extensive cracking <strong>and</strong> spalling<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten a partial collapse <strong>of</strong> the bridge seating.<br />
A famous example <strong>of</strong> bridge deck damage due to h<strong>and</strong>-placed explosives<br />
was the attack by German frogmen against the Nijmegen road bridge in<br />
September 1944. This has been reported in detail by Hamilton [8.21], who<br />
recounts that early in the morning <strong>of</strong> 28 September large explosions were<br />
heard. Over 70 feet <strong>of</strong> the roadway disappeared, following the actions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
frogmen, who used naval mines weighing 1200 lb, fitted with float chambers.<br />
These were placed in a necklace around the piers before the float chambers<br />
were released <strong>and</strong> delay fuses activated; however, the mines released their<br />
impact forces upwards, failing to damage the piers, but disrupting the roadway.