24.10.2012 Views

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

196<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> explosive loading<br />

(large) or Ground Slam bomb (22 000 lb). However, the first Tallboy (large)<br />

bomb) was dropped by the UK in operations against the Bielefeld Viaduct, <strong>and</strong><br />

it fell 50 ft away from the piers. The loosening <strong>of</strong> the earth caused the destruction<br />

<strong>of</strong> six piers <strong>and</strong> five arches <strong>of</strong> the viaduct, <strong>and</strong> although the approximate shape<br />

<strong>of</strong> the crater was 150 ft diameter, 45 ft deep, the loosening <strong>of</strong> the soil occurred<br />

over a diameter <strong>of</strong> 240 ft, <strong>and</strong> to a total depth <strong>of</strong> 75 ft. These lessons <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Second World War were perhaps learned again by the forces <strong>of</strong> the west in the<br />

Gulf War against Iraq, when the US was reported to be turning away from the<br />

precision bombing <strong>of</strong> bridges with relatively small bombs to the use <strong>of</strong> very<br />

heavy bombs that could cause destruction from near misses.<br />

Near miss explosions, as we have seen earlier, can cause high blast pressures<br />

on components such as the relatively thin plating <strong>of</strong> the webs <strong>of</strong> deep plate<br />

girders. Damage is then mostly by permanent deformation <strong>and</strong> distortion, <strong>and</strong><br />

removal <strong>of</strong> the integrity <strong>of</strong> web members. In certain circumstances this can lead<br />

to shear failure <strong>and</strong> possible lateral buckling. A final commentary on the damage<br />

<strong>and</strong> repair <strong>of</strong> bridges during the Second World War was provided by<br />

Christopherson [8.3], who briefly examined ways <strong>of</strong> pre-strengthening existing<br />

civil bridges against the possibility <strong>of</strong> bomb damage. He emphasized the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> permeability, ductility <strong>and</strong> redundancy, <strong>and</strong> the need to eliminate<br />

the possibility <strong>of</strong> progressive collapse in viaducts. In general, the results <strong>of</strong> surveys<br />

in the UK <strong>and</strong> US suggested that when it came to bombing from aircraft, it was<br />

better to shake down the piers than shoot up the superstructure. The susceptibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> bridge piers to undermining processes is, <strong>of</strong> course, well known from studies<br />

<strong>of</strong> civil bridge structural failure, where it has been found that about half <strong>of</strong> all<br />

bridge failures is due to scouring under piers <strong>and</strong> abutments.<br />

The explosive damage to bridges from h<strong>and</strong>-placed contact charges is also<br />

an important aspect <strong>of</strong> our review. In 1971, for example, during a local war in<br />

Bangladesh, explosive charge damage was recorded on a number <strong>of</strong> relatively<br />

small reinforced concrete road bridges, <strong>and</strong> on one steel truss bridge. The<br />

damage was <strong>of</strong>ten in the form <strong>of</strong> holes in the deck, sometimes involving the<br />

partial destruction <strong>of</strong> multi-beams supporting the deck slabs, <strong>and</strong> occasionally<br />

this was severe enough to cause the complete collapse <strong>of</strong> a bridge span. Damage<br />

was also reported to reinforced concrete piers, which collapsed sideways, <strong>and</strong><br />

to masonry abutments. The latter suffered extensive cracking <strong>and</strong> spalling<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten a partial collapse <strong>of</strong> the bridge seating.<br />

A famous example <strong>of</strong> bridge deck damage due to h<strong>and</strong>-placed explosives<br />

was the attack by German frogmen against the Nijmegen road bridge in<br />

September 1944. This has been reported in detail by Hamilton [8.21], who<br />

recounts that early in the morning <strong>of</strong> 28 September large explosions were<br />

heard. Over 70 feet <strong>of</strong> the roadway disappeared, following the actions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

frogmen, who used naval mines weighing 1200 lb, fitted with float chambers.<br />

These were placed in a necklace around the piers before the float chambers<br />

were released <strong>and</strong> delay fuses activated; however, the mines released their<br />

impact forces upwards, failing to damage the piers, but disrupting the roadway.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!