24.10.2012 Views

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The stability <strong>of</strong> masonry walls under the action <strong>of</strong> blast from conventional<br />

explosives was examined experimentally in a series <strong>of</strong> tests in the late 1970s<br />

<strong>and</strong> early 1980s in the USA. Collapse mechanisms were recorded, as well as<br />

the nature <strong>and</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> debris from shattering walls, <strong>and</strong> a range <strong>of</strong><br />

construction was investigated, varying from load-bearing masonry to reinforced<br />

concrete frames with a masonry infill. These tests were summarised by Rempel<br />

<strong>and</strong> Beck [8.13], who also analysed crushing energy <strong>and</strong> wall rotation.<br />

Attention was also paid to the design <strong>of</strong> explosive storage facilities constructed<br />

<strong>of</strong> masonry, including overpressures to cause incipient failure <strong>and</strong> safe separation<br />

distances between storage facilities <strong>and</strong> neighbouring buildings <strong>of</strong> brick, masonry<br />

<strong>and</strong> prefabricated blocks. The state <strong>of</strong> affairs in the early 1980s was reviewed by<br />

Napadensky <strong>and</strong> Longinow [8.14]. They quoted current US regulations, which at<br />

the time permitted conventional, inhabited buildings to be located at distances <strong>of</strong><br />

40 W 1/3 to 50 W 1/3 ft from an explosives store, where W is the weight <strong>of</strong> explosive in<br />

pounds. For long-duration pressure/duration blast loads that would be experienced<br />

in a nuclear explosion, incipient failure overpressures (where the structure will fail<br />

under any additional load) was given in terms <strong>of</strong> probability <strong>of</strong> failure as follows.<br />

(a) Light commercial buildings with masonry load bearing walls: 2.0; 3.2; 4.9<br />

psi for failure probabilities <strong>of</strong> 10%, 50% <strong>and</strong> 90% respectively.<br />

(b) One-storey masonry load-bearing wall: 1.8; 2.8; 4.6 psi for failure<br />

probabilities <strong>of</strong> 10%, 50% <strong>and</strong> 90% respectively.<br />

Safe separation distances, peak overpressures <strong>and</strong> impulses, for a range <strong>of</strong><br />

non-nuclear explosions, were tabulated by the authors for a range <strong>of</strong> targets.<br />

Excerpts from their survey are given in Table 8.3.<br />

The authors compared the damage, pressures <strong>and</strong> distances with the recorded<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> the Flixborough vapour cloud explosion in 1974. Damage analysis<br />

Table 8.3<br />

Civil buildings 189<br />

(Separation distance in ft; overpressive in psi; impulse in psi ms)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!