A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments
A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments
A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
144<br />
Penetration <strong>and</strong> fragmentation<br />
penetration <strong>and</strong> V. On this basis, Young discussed the following equation for<br />
penetration into soil:<br />
(7.5)<br />
The units are reconciled in the constant terms 0.53 <strong>and</strong> 0.0031.<br />
S is the soil constant <strong>and</strong> N a nose-performance coefficient, which takes<br />
account <strong>of</strong> the nose shape, ranging from a flat nose (N=0.56), to a cone shape<br />
having a length <strong>of</strong> cone equal to three times the diameter (N=1.32). Note<br />
that, contrary to the theories <strong>of</strong> Poncelet <strong>and</strong> Perry, penetration in soil is<br />
proportional to (Wp/A) 1/2 rather than Wp/A. Values <strong>of</strong> S <strong>and</strong> N were found<br />
experimentally, <strong>and</strong> linked to broad ranges <strong>of</strong> soil type thus:<br />
Rock: S=1.07<br />
Dense, dry silty s<strong>and</strong>: =2.5<br />
Silty clay: =5.2<br />
Loose, moist s<strong>and</strong>: =7.0<br />
Moist clay: =10.5<br />
Wet silty clay: =40<br />
S<strong>of</strong>t wet clay: =50.<br />
Thus, all other things being equal, penetration in s<strong>of</strong>t wet clay is about 50<br />
times as far as in rock, <strong>and</strong> about 20 times as far as in dense, dry, silty s<strong>and</strong>.<br />
Typical values <strong>of</strong> N are:<br />
Flat nose N =0.56<br />
Tangent Ogive 2.2 CRH =0.82<br />
Tangent Ogive 6 CRH =1.00<br />
Cone (L/D=3) =1.32.<br />
Care must be taken not to give these figures a greater scientific accuracy than<br />
they merit, since the scatter <strong>of</strong> penetration test results is notoriously wide.<br />
Experimental data exists on penetration depths up to 220 feet <strong>and</strong> in Young’s<br />
equations there is apparently no upper limit to the value <strong>of</strong> p for penetration<br />
into homogeneous soil. There is a lower limit, however, <strong>and</strong> it is suggested that<br />
the equations apply as long as the total depth <strong>of</strong> penetration is equal to ‘three<br />
body diameters plus one nose length’. At lesser depths the mechanics <strong>of</strong> penetration<br />
are not fully activated. Further, if the nose length is more than one-third <strong>of</strong> the<br />
total penetrator length there is insufficient length <strong>of</strong> cylindrical section to ensure<br />
stability, because the centre <strong>of</strong> gravity <strong>of</strong> the penetrator is too far aft.<br />
It is useful to note that the practical range <strong>of</strong> Wp/A is fairly limited, <strong>and</strong><br />
ratios greater than 15 to 20psi are difficult to achieve. For solid steel, to take<br />
an extreme example, a billet having a diameter 4 in <strong>and</strong> a length <strong>of</strong> 60 in, has<br />
a value <strong>of</strong> Wp/A=17. There is also a practical range for velocity, V, in Young’s<br />
equations. He suggests that at impact velocities less than 105 ft/sec, the<br />
penetration depth is too shallow for reliable analysis.