24.10.2012 Views

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

144<br />

Penetration <strong>and</strong> fragmentation<br />

penetration <strong>and</strong> V. On this basis, Young discussed the following equation for<br />

penetration into soil:<br />

(7.5)<br />

The units are reconciled in the constant terms 0.53 <strong>and</strong> 0.0031.<br />

S is the soil constant <strong>and</strong> N a nose-performance coefficient, which takes<br />

account <strong>of</strong> the nose shape, ranging from a flat nose (N=0.56), to a cone shape<br />

having a length <strong>of</strong> cone equal to three times the diameter (N=1.32). Note<br />

that, contrary to the theories <strong>of</strong> Poncelet <strong>and</strong> Perry, penetration in soil is<br />

proportional to (Wp/A) 1/2 rather than Wp/A. Values <strong>of</strong> S <strong>and</strong> N were found<br />

experimentally, <strong>and</strong> linked to broad ranges <strong>of</strong> soil type thus:<br />

Rock: S=1.07<br />

Dense, dry silty s<strong>and</strong>: =2.5<br />

Silty clay: =5.2<br />

Loose, moist s<strong>and</strong>: =7.0<br />

Moist clay: =10.5<br />

Wet silty clay: =40<br />

S<strong>of</strong>t wet clay: =50.<br />

Thus, all other things being equal, penetration in s<strong>of</strong>t wet clay is about 50<br />

times as far as in rock, <strong>and</strong> about 20 times as far as in dense, dry, silty s<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Typical values <strong>of</strong> N are:<br />

Flat nose N =0.56<br />

Tangent Ogive 2.2 CRH =0.82<br />

Tangent Ogive 6 CRH =1.00<br />

Cone (L/D=3) =1.32.<br />

Care must be taken not to give these figures a greater scientific accuracy than<br />

they merit, since the scatter <strong>of</strong> penetration test results is notoriously wide.<br />

Experimental data exists on penetration depths up to 220 feet <strong>and</strong> in Young’s<br />

equations there is apparently no upper limit to the value <strong>of</strong> p for penetration<br />

into homogeneous soil. There is a lower limit, however, <strong>and</strong> it is suggested that<br />

the equations apply as long as the total depth <strong>of</strong> penetration is equal to ‘three<br />

body diameters plus one nose length’. At lesser depths the mechanics <strong>of</strong> penetration<br />

are not fully activated. Further, if the nose length is more than one-third <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total penetrator length there is insufficient length <strong>of</strong> cylindrical section to ensure<br />

stability, because the centre <strong>of</strong> gravity <strong>of</strong> the penetrator is too far aft.<br />

It is useful to note that the practical range <strong>of</strong> Wp/A is fairly limited, <strong>and</strong><br />

ratios greater than 15 to 20psi are difficult to achieve. For solid steel, to take<br />

an extreme example, a billet having a diameter 4 in <strong>and</strong> a length <strong>of</strong> 60 in, has<br />

a value <strong>of</strong> Wp/A=17. There is also a practical range for velocity, V, in Young’s<br />

equations. He suggests that at impact velocities less than 105 ft/sec, the<br />

penetration depth is too shallow for reliable analysis.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!