24.10.2012 Views

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

142<br />

Penetration <strong>and</strong> fragmentation<br />

research work <strong>of</strong> that era. One <strong>of</strong> the earliest penetration theories [7.1] was<br />

due to J.V. Poncelet (1788–1867), mentioned earlier in the Introduction, who<br />

was a French military engineer <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> engineering mechanics at the<br />

military school in Metz. He had a perceptive view <strong>of</strong> the physics <strong>of</strong> the<br />

penetrative process, in which he combined the resistance <strong>of</strong> a medium to the<br />

static penetration by a body with a resistance linked to the speed at which the<br />

body was moving. He considered that the dynamic resistance in a material<br />

such as soil or s<strong>and</strong> should be analogous to resistance to fluid dynamic flow.<br />

He therefore assumed that the force resisting penetration would be given<br />

by the equation<br />

F=–A(a+bV (7.1)<br />

where<br />

F = resisting force<br />

A = cross sectional area <strong>of</strong> the projectile<br />

V = impact velocity<br />

a, b were constants to be determined by experiment.<br />

If the mass <strong>of</strong> the projectile=m, the equation <strong>of</strong> motion is<br />

2 ),<br />

<strong>and</strong> by integration we get the relationship<br />

(7.2)<br />

(7.3)<br />

where p=vertical penetration.<br />

This assumes that the material has sufficient depth in the direction <strong>of</strong><br />

penetration to bring the projectile to rest before it ‘breaks out’ <strong>of</strong> the far side.<br />

If this is not so, adjustments have to be made to the analysis, as we shall see<br />

later. The difference between penetration into soil or concrete, or other frangible<br />

materials, <strong>and</strong> into strong, ductile materials is very great, <strong>and</strong> is influenced by<br />

the average pressures resisting penetration. These can be 15 times greater in<br />

steel armour, for example, than for concrete. For all materials it is the kinetic<br />

energy <strong>of</strong> an undeforming projectile that crushes <strong>and</strong> distorts the target.<br />

The contribution <strong>of</strong> Poncelet to many problems in materials science has<br />

been well documented in the book <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> Strength <strong>of</strong> Materials (ref. [7.2]),<br />

<strong>and</strong> it is from this that we learn that he started from poor beginnings before<br />

winning scholarships that eventually took him to the Ecole Polytechnique.<br />

He joined Napoleon’s army in 1812 <strong>and</strong> was taken prisoner during the retreat<br />

from Moscow. His ideas about projective geometry were developed during<br />

his confinement for two years in Saratov. After his subsequent career at Metz<br />

he became comm<strong>and</strong>ant <strong>of</strong> the Ecole Polytechnique between 1848 <strong>and</strong> 1850.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!