24.10.2012 Views

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

116<br />

Structural loading from local explosions<br />

shock tube experiments at the US Army Ballistics <strong>Research</strong> Laboratory were<br />

carried out by Coulter [5.26] in which chamber volumes, entrance areas,<br />

pressures <strong>and</strong> geometries were varied. It was shown that the pressure wave<br />

exp<strong>and</strong>ing into the chamber decays in amplitude <strong>and</strong> reflects from internal<br />

surfaces. The attenuation <strong>of</strong> the instantaneous peak pressure was inversely<br />

proportioned to the opening diameter, <strong>and</strong> its positive duration was directly<br />

proportional to the diameter. For non-circular openings the diameter was<br />

replaced by a ‘mean opening dimension’. Tests at the US Army Waterways<br />

Experiment Station in the early 1980s, using C-4 <strong>and</strong> TNT charges, showed<br />

that side-on peak pressures in the test chambers (p max) were related to the<br />

peak pressure in the opening (entrance tunnel) (p 0) by the equation<br />

p max /p 0 =0.65(1–0.25α)(R/D) –1.35 ,<br />

(5.32)<br />

where R is the distance <strong>of</strong> the centre <strong>of</strong> the opening to the pressure gauge in<br />

the chamber <strong>and</strong> D is entrance tunnel diameter. a is the angle in radians between<br />

the normal to the centre <strong>of</strong> the opening <strong>and</strong> the gauge location. For small<br />

angles it was sufficient to ignore a <strong>and</strong> within the units <strong>of</strong> experimental scatter<br />

to simplify the above equation to p max/p 0=0.65(R/D) –1.35 . The values <strong>of</strong> p max<br />

are due to the first side-on peak at the gauge as the result <strong>of</strong> incident pressure<br />

<strong>and</strong> do not take account <strong>of</strong> internally reflected waves. If information about<br />

reflected waves is required, then a more complex analysis involving a shock<br />

diffraction model is needed. Path lengths <strong>of</strong> ‘rays’ <strong>of</strong> successively higher order<br />

reflections are generated, <strong>and</strong> arrival times calculated; then shock wave<br />

attenuation with distance is found. The procedure is fully described in ref.<br />

[5.24]. The combined pressure pulse in a chamber, found in this way, can be<br />

calculated using the code CHAMBER, originally for a mainframe computer<br />

but converted to run on a desktop computer. Predictions for the initial peak<br />

reflected shock were shown to agree well with test results.<br />

It is clear that the levels <strong>of</strong> pressure from an internal explosion, whether due to<br />

a high-explosive detonation or a vapour or dust cloud deflagration, can be reduced<br />

by the judicious use <strong>of</strong> vents. The design <strong>of</strong> venting systems is governed by the<br />

pressure reductions that are required, so there has been a considerable research<br />

effort in this area. Going back to the work <strong>of</strong> Christopherson [4.6], which we<br />

mentioned earlier, we noted that he analysed the effect on the pressure in a rigid<br />

rectangular chamber if one end were vented. The ‘partial enclosure’ was the subject<br />

<strong>of</strong> an empirical relationship in which the results <strong>of</strong> a small number <strong>of</strong> observations<br />

were recorded in terms <strong>of</strong> the charge weight <strong>of</strong> TNT, the volume (V) in cubic feet,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the face-on blast impulse on the venting side wall <strong>of</strong> a cubical enclosure (A T),<br />

in lb m sec/in 2 . His results are plotted in Figure 5.19 on the axes A T/W 1/3 <strong>and</strong> V/<br />

W(the volume <strong>of</strong> the chamber per lb <strong>of</strong> charge). For initial design purposes, the<br />

relationship took the approximate form (Imperial units):<br />

(A T /W 1/3 )(V/W)=15, (V in ft 3 ).<br />

(5.33)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!