24.10.2012 Views

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

110<br />

Structural loading from local explosions<br />

enable extremely complex systems with up to 1000 branches to be analysed for<br />

a very wide range <strong>of</strong> inlet geometries <strong>and</strong> bomb orientations. Codes <strong>of</strong> this type<br />

can be used, for example, to model the effect <strong>of</strong> shock waves in the ducting<br />

system <strong>of</strong> aircraft or ship structures, <strong>and</strong> are valuable tools in analysing the<br />

strength <strong>of</strong> such structures under attack by terrorist explosive devices. Most <strong>of</strong><br />

the codes are marketed by the developers, <strong>and</strong> a comparison <strong>of</strong> their capabilities<br />

is beyond the purpose <strong>of</strong> this book. However, one code which was commissioned<br />

by the US Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers, Omaha District, <strong>and</strong> written at the University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Nevada, has been described in some detail by Fashbaugh [5.15]. The code,<br />

which can be used on a PC computer, enables the shock propagation in ducting<br />

systems (SPIDS) to be calculated sequentially. The shock propagation in a main<br />

duct, for example, is calculated <strong>and</strong> the time history <strong>of</strong> pressures <strong>and</strong> temperatures<br />

is stored on a computer file. This file then specifies pressures <strong>and</strong> temperatures<br />

at the inlet <strong>of</strong> a branch duct from which the shock propagation in the duct can<br />

be deduced. This procedure can be repeated for large numbers <strong>of</strong> branches—up<br />

to ten for each specific duct. There are limitations, one <strong>of</strong> which is that reflected<br />

shock waves from branch ducts into main ducts are not accounted for; neither<br />

are shock wave losses as the wave passes the entrance to a branch duct.<br />

Simulation is achieved by evaluating flow losses from a point s just outside<br />

the duct entrance to a point e inside the entrance, using the collected results <strong>of</strong><br />

many experimental programmes. The duct entrance static pressure p e is related<br />

to the pressure outside the duct, p s, by the relationship<br />

where p te/p ts is the stagnation pressure ratio, given by<br />

(5.28)<br />

(5.29)<br />

T e <strong>and</strong> T s are static temperatures at points e <strong>and</strong> s; T te <strong>and</strong> T ts are stagnation<br />

temperatures. A(1) <strong>and</strong> A(2) are empirical coefficients that depend on the<br />

entrance geometry <strong>and</strong> position <strong>of</strong> the explosion, <strong>and</strong> M s is the flow Mach<br />

number outside the duct. The shock wave attenuation due to internal friction<br />

in the ducting is represented by a friction factor, given in terms <strong>of</strong> (h/D) 1/2 , as<br />

discussed earlier, where h is the average wall protrusion height <strong>and</strong> D is the<br />

duct diameter. Fashbaugh used the equation<br />

t=0.016+0.00491(h/D) 1/2 +0.258(h/D),<br />

(5.30)<br />

<strong>and</strong> for a side-on entrance A(1)=1.1398, A(2)=1.24. The linear relationship<br />

between p te/p ts <strong>and</strong> M s from experiments is shown in Figure 5.15. The code<br />

has been shown to give good agreement with tests for the decay <strong>of</strong> shock<br />

pressure with distance along a duct, <strong>and</strong> for the effects <strong>of</strong> a sudden increase in<br />

the cross-sectional area <strong>of</strong> a duct.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!