24.10.2012 Views

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

A History of Research and a Review of Recent Developments

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Loads on underwater structures 87<br />

compared with the natural period <strong>of</strong> the structure, which is more likely when<br />

the structure is very flexible, then the basis <strong>of</strong> damage assessment would be<br />

the total impulse <strong>of</strong> the shock load.<br />

We have already seen that the pulsating bubble phenomena associated with<br />

underwater explosions result in the mass movement <strong>of</strong> water as well as pressure<br />

pulses. The pressure pulse from a bubble at its minimum is greatest when<br />

bubble migration is small. According to ref. [4.16] this meant for example<br />

that for a 300 lb charge <strong>of</strong> TNT in a mine, the mine should be moored 14 feet<br />

above the seabed. The mass motion <strong>of</strong> water that accelerates radially outwards<br />

from the exp<strong>and</strong>ing bubble is an important factor when considering closerange<br />

underwater damage, but for larger, distant explosions its effect is<br />

considerably diminished. This is because the kinetic energy <strong>of</strong> the outflowing<br />

water falls away as the fourth power <strong>of</strong> distance, whereas the energy in the<br />

shock wave is reduced according to the second power <strong>of</strong> distance.<br />

Christopherson [4.6], in summarizing the work in underwater explosions<br />

in the UK during the Second World War, made the point that underwater<br />

structures such as submarines are virtually unsupported, in that there is no<br />

rigid support to ensure that the natural period <strong>of</strong> oscillation <strong>of</strong> the vessel is<br />

short in comparison with the duration time <strong>of</strong> a high incident pressure. He<br />

quoted the work <strong>of</strong> G.I. Taylor [4.17] who considered the oblique impact <strong>of</strong><br />

an underwater shock wave on targets with a variety <strong>of</strong> supporting forces. For<br />

the simplest condition, in which a shock wave strikes normally a completely<br />

unsupported underwater plane surface having mass m per unit area, he showed<br />

that on the surface <strong>of</strong> the plate the total pressure (p) is given by<br />

p/p 1=e –t/θ +φ(t),<br />

(4.14)<br />

where p 1 is the pressure in the incident shock wave, t is the time measured<br />

from the moment <strong>of</strong> arrival, <strong>and</strong> θ is the time for the pressure to fall to half its<br />

initial value. If the unsupported plane surface remains in contact with the<br />

water in the incident wave it is possible to formulate its equation <strong>of</strong> motion,<br />

<strong>and</strong> from this to show that<br />

(4.15)<br />

where e is the dimensionless parameter ρcθ/m, c is the velocity <strong>of</strong> sound in<br />

water, <strong>and</strong> ρ is water density. The maximum velocity <strong>of</strong> the plane surface<br />

occurs when the pressure has fallen to zero, i.e. when<br />

(4.16)<br />

<strong>and</strong> at this moment the water begins to exert a retarding force on the plane<br />

surface. The plane surface then loses contact with the water <strong>and</strong> cavitation<br />

occurs. Substituting for t/ρ in [4.15], <strong>and</strong> remembering that the net velocity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!